Ummmm – I don’t think Winston (or Thomas Cranmer) understands the Terrorism Suppression Act
Great to see Winston up and about and yelling at the clouds again, but this insane interpretation of the Terrorism Suppression Act and his desire to send the military in to Opotiki is so deeply flawed, I’m not sure where to begin.
Firstly, the great and brilliant Graeme Edgeler (who was my lawyer in my fight against the NZ Police) points out why legally this is insane…
…he is of course right.
To qualify as a Terrorist organisation and unleash all the enormous military power of the State that goes along with that, you have to actually have an ideological, religious, political purpose.
Simply being criminal doesn’t trigger the extraordinary powers of the State.
What happened in Opotiki is a policing issue and a societal issue, letting the State off the leash to declare effective martial law so the paramilitary police can start shooting people is not a fucking solution, it is an inane provocation.
We need less Police State flexing and more actual thinking to ensure our reaction doesn’t make things worse.
Oh and as for the Alt Rights current favourite thinking mans crumpet, Thomas Cranmer…
…yeah.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media
Totally agree with you Bomber.
We need Winston to get to 5% to get a handle on ACT if the Nats get in. So Winston needs to stop acting like he has Alzheimers and get with the program or NZF will never get across the line! As a Lawyer he knows full well this is ludicrous and is playing politics in the worse way.
Hadnt noticed that Thomas Cranmer is Alt Right, obviously notice that he’s fairly conservative and I imagine a Nats voter but I hadnt thought of him as Alt Right until you raised it.
Thinking back, he has written a fair bit on the vaccinations issue.
Why I think people like him is that he does do some good research on his columns and raises some pertinent issues especially around issues like the details within 3 Waters and the new RMA, Ministerial impropriety etc. He doesnt generally spout ideology but gives a fairly well thought out argument supporting his views. He is great at digging through contracts, cabinet manuals etc etc and finding the flaws in what the Government is doing.