Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

13 Comments

  1. Let’s not forget that this system is not benign. There are people behind it, there is power behind it, they being those that have benefited the most from this system, thus have shaped this system into what it is now. Point being, they stand in our way, and arguably, they are a step ahead of us, in as much as they are looking to recreate this system – build back better – as they let it be known as to what they intend to do with it.

    This should tell us all that they are well aware of the growing resentment and that in their plan to build a system that benefits them even more, they also have plans to nullify future push-back, bearing in mind that in this day and age, protests and non-compliance are commonly seen as socially destructive acts, let alone criminal acts, then the jump to outlawing any protest or non-compliance over any governmental decision, is only one short step away.

    Yes, we need to fightback now because we may never, ever, get another chance to fightback again. Seriously!

  2. Capitalism works well when it is based on “capital” it fails when it is based on “debt”

    Communism works well when more is contributed by the people to the system than is taken by others.
    It fails when more is taken than contributed.

    Socialism stands between these two extremes, and both rules apply for socialism.
    So right now in NZ we have business (the so called capitalist enterprises) through their debt controled by foreighn banks.

    We have too many of the population dependant on the state (tax payers) for basic income, (direct benefits, working for families, housing grants etc) for their survival.

    We have right now In fact the worst of both systems!!

  3. We now have socialist fascists as well as capitalist fascists – even worse they seem to agree on many of the policies that have gone wrong like housing. aka it is a supply problem not demand problem and removing housing regulation and democracy from council planning would solve the problem. Instead they made it much worse. Then the healthy homes, well now there are very few low cost private housing to rent available especially in the small towns who now can’t keep staff. Baches not only don’t comply with the gold standards of healthy homes, you wouldn’t be able to get a builder due to changes to liability and the lack of skills (funny enough if you don’t get paid, locals leave the profession, (https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/developer-calls-in-liquidator-covid-price-rises-loan-default-take-toll/3O4S5QGU42UUSDPKWGQQEUCHBI/) or afford to pay to upgrade the bach and still keep rents low.

    In addition a fixation of low and underpaid wages, is making workers poorer though lower and lower wages that increasingly need government subsidies to get to a liveable wage, which is no longer livable.

    1. Fascism has always been at both ends of the political spectrum – just the motivation that varies.

  4. And as an aside Martyn, you sum it up as a battle between fascism or socialism except we dont have any socialists left to vote for. We have Neo Liberal LINOs whose only super power is identity politics. Give us back our Labour party and we will all vote for them!!

    Read this, this morning and almost choked on my weetbix. More of this is my prediction for 2022. https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/uknews/teachers-union-calls-on-government-to-address-ethnicity-pay-gap/ar-AASyaR7?ocid=msedgntp

    This is so effed up – their own statistics show how the ideology has overtaken all common sense. Apparently State Services are working on the same thing here! We cant afford housing for the desperate but we can afford a bump up for all women in the public service, second round, will be a further bump up for all ethnic minorities (on top of what was given to women if they are a minority) and then the kicker, a possible additional sum on the basis of reparations presumably based on length of service.

    As you are fond of saying Martyn, Jesus Wept.

    I also wish I knew a guy.

  5. What we need is not more socialism, which history showed that does not work, but more democracy so that people can have more say about things that matter the most like what their money are spent for by local councils and by government and what systemic changes they want to implement to improve the funcionality of the system and what they do not want.

    1. I’m all for democracy. Who wouldn’t be. But people having more say about things that matter the most … well, again, who would also not support that. Trouble is that most people are, frankly, not all that well educated beyond the basics. And some not even that. More so in so -called ‘developing’ countries. I don’t necessarliy mean a formal eduication, but just what used to be called ‘well read’. Critical of the bullshit and lies around them. Even a good many of those who do have formal qualifications fall far short. But eventually they lash out, like the deplorables. They are attracted to false prophets, but no more so than those attacted to the ‘real’ prophets.

      Most people, don’t you think, are simply manipulated by the system, irrespective of the postion they take. Consume more resources, consume more useless stuff, and make more money to pay for it all, compete in the great game. And, those who faulter, well its their fault, the lazy sods. Too bad there are structural inequalities built into the system. Too bad the playing field is not level.

      The things that really matter to most people, on a personal level, irrespective of their position, don’t align with what really matters at the global level, or even at the national and community levels. Most. Granted there are brave souls with vision and conviction to change things, at the personal, local and global level. Hard yakka in a globalised world speaking with one tongue: neoliberalism. Democracy? Nah, it’s been corrupted.

      1. How do you want to achieve any improvement, to remove structural inequalities, to level the playing field, if not by democratic processes? By implying more and more autoritative rules until we will end in totalitarianism for our own sake? The only way is to educate, to explain, to persuade, to expose corruption, to show the goal and the method etc. The way how democracy has worked since ancient Athens.

        1. No, I don’t wish to imply more and more autoritative rules until we will end in totalitarianism for our own sake. Perhaps I was having a bad day, despondent at the enormity of the task in the context of neoliberalism, false truths, fake news, and political inaction. We all have bad days.

Comments are closed.