Similar Posts

2 Comments

  1. It should have seemed obvious to the current Labour coalition government, that National policies to actively shrink the state and provide tax cuts would require additional funding to restore services. Instead we got the fiscal responsibility agreement. They effectively tied their hands before they even achieved power. Likewise it should seem obvious that with all DHBs being in “deficit”, given the government is their only source of funding, that they are underfunded. Yet given that it has been stated that the funding formula is “working”, expect more cuts to service to restore fiscal discipline. There isn’t very much “progressive” about modern progressive governments.

  2. A woman who did not get her children immunized at 15 months and 4 years then demands to be placed at the front of the queue during a measles epidemic by paying is not a failure of the DHB. When there is an epidemic the vaccinations need to be kept aside for 1) children who are in immunisation timeframes 2) children who are outside immunisation timeframes but ethnicity raises their risk. The fact that money does not trump risk makes me happy and think that the DHB’s have it right. 3 months ago my son who is 22 was rung up by the doctor to come in for MMR unless he could provide plunket book with immunisation record. People are getting immunized. Yes the MOH is not working as well as it might but using the fact that a woman could not buy a jump up the queue is not a failure.

Comments are closed.