GUEST BLOG: Ben Morgan – Stalemate?


Last week Russia continued to throw soldiers at Avdiivka, without success and launched the war’s most extensive artillery barrage to date hitting 118 Ukrainian towns and villages in one night. Ukraine continues to attack Bakhmut, retains its bridgehead over the Dnipro River and captured ground on the Orikhiv Axis. On 5 November, Ukrainian missiles hit the port of Kerch damaging at least one warship. However, the week’s biggest news is General Valery Zaluzhny, Ukrainian Chief of Defence Force’s frank discussion with the Economist. He made a powerful statement about the war; including discussing the offensive’s slow progress, Ukraine’s exhaustion and the prospect of a long war of attrition. The general’s statement reflects a growing acknowledgement that the war is entering a new phase. The ‘centre,’ or the section of frontline roughly between Orikhiv and Bakhmut is effectively frozen and although both sides are active, neither has momentum. This raises the possibility that the land campaign may settle into a long stalemate.

In an essay and an interview, General Zaluzhny provided the Economist with his insights into the changing nature of war.  He concludes that this war is like World War One in that technology has strengthened defence to a point at which manoeuvre is almost impossible. The general stating “I realized that is exactly where we are because just like then, the level of our technological development today has put both us and our enemies in a stupor.”  After nearly two years observing this war, he may be correct.  The key issue that separates this war from past conflicts is not the depth of minefields or huge expenditure of artillery, it is not even precision strike or drones.  

Instead, it seems that the change is that both armies are sufficiently ‘network enabled’ to ensure almost complete surveillance of the battlefield and that the ‘sensor-shooter link’ is almost instant.  In lay terms, the whole of the battlefield is now under observation not only by military observers but by anybody with a cell phone. “The simple fact is that we see everything the enemy is doing, and they see everything we are doing” says the general. Further, almost any of these observers can be quickly linked to a weapon system capable of hitting the target.  Whether it is a suicide drone, a precision guided artillery shell, a normal artillery fire mission or ATACMS; targets almost anywhere can be quickly identified, easily located and quickly attacked. The fact that both sides have this technology and the way it is being integrated with the tools of traditional conventional war like minefields and massed artillery is unique.

The 1990 and 2003 Gulf Wars, were both ‘near peer’ conventional wars fought by large armies like the Ukraine War.  However, only one side the American led Coalition was network enabled so this technology was not tested against a similarly integrated force. Afghanistan’s long occupation involved extremely network enabled American and NATO led forces achieving high-levels of surveillance and very short response times for air, missile or artillery strikes.  In this war the enemy was an un-structured guerilla force so again there was not a test of this technology within the context of a near-peer conventional conflict.

- Sponsor Promotion -

And; this is the secret to understanding the current situation because this is the first war in history in which a defending force has integrated obstacles like mines, Dragon’s Teeth and barbed wire with digitally enabled surveillance and immediate, accurate fire.  The combined effect is to massively strengthen the defence’s combat capability.  Clearing a minefield is now a much more difficult task than it was even only twenty years ago, the preponderance of surveillance is oppressive and difficult to avoid.  Any mistake spotted immediately by loitering drones, or by a local person filming on their Smartphone.    

The overall impact of this technological change, the general argues, is to create a situation like the Western Front’s stalemate during World War One.  That neither side can develop sufficient movement to create enough momentum to penetrate the enemy’s line to sufficient depth to inflict a defeat.  Instead, both sides are locked in an attritional battle forced to try and smash holes in each other’s line using artillery’s destructive firepower rather than manoeuvre.  General Zaluzhny’s comments are frank and highlight the tactical issues that Ukraine is facing in the land campaign. 

Additionally, this week provided evidence that Ukraine’s people and its leader Volodymyr Zelensky are tired.  Expressing his frustration when interviewed last week by Time journalist Simon Shuster, Zelensky observed that internationally “Exhaustion with the war rolls along like a wave. You see it in the United States, in Europe. And we see that as soon as they start to get a little tired, it becomes like a show to them: ‘I can’t watch this rerun for the 10th time.’”  A statement that captures the difficulty he faces in the information battle, trying to influence international public opinion. How can he ensure that Ukraine remains relevant? Especially, when his supporter’s investment is not paying dividends and other issues like Gaza are diverting international attention.  At home, he is under pressure as Ukrainian families start to protest about the dangers and long terms of service their members face fighting this war.  

Strategic factors are also impacting on Ukraine’s position. In the United States, domestic political tensions are affecting the flow of aid.  A situation that may get worse, a recent Gallup poll finding that 41% of Americans think the United States is providing to much support.  A significant increase from 29% in June.  2024 is an election year and this trend will weigh heavily on American politicians.   

Meanwhile, South Korean military intelligence informs us that North Korea has already shipped one million artillery rounds to Ukraine.  A huge amount, considering Europe has managed only about a third of this number, constrained by European Union requirements to source ammunition supplied to Ukraine from within Europe.  An economic decision with dire consequences for Ukraine because instead of being able to simply buy ammunition from stockpiles in the Middle East, Latin America or from manufacturers like South Korea supplies must be sourced or produced in Europe, slowing down delivery time.  

In summary, Ukraine is in a tough situation. But, is it as tough as the general says

Interpreting his statements and assessing Ukraine’s actual position requires taking a step back and closely analysing both the land campaign and the strategic information battle.  Generals do not give interviews unless they want too!  We have discussed the land campaign in some detail in recent weeks and General Zaluzhny’s observations of the situation in the ‘centre’ appear to be accurate.  The Economist article acknowledges the situation and appears to be aiming to reset the Ukraine’s discussion with its supporters. The general preparing Ukraine’s supporters for a long war and encouraging them to look forward rather than backwards. 

The statements need to be seen in this context, the general admitting that the offensive has not delivered to expectations and trying to reset expectations. The frank and honest assessments are designed to acknowledge the situation and provide a basis for future discussion.  Ukraine needs to maintain its relationships with its supporters and the basis of any relationship is trust, and honesty builds trust. The article also looks forward providing information about the support Ukraine needs to break the deadlock including:

  • Fighter aircraft.
  • More electronic warfare capability, especially anti-drone systems.
  • Counter battery capabilities.  Like more artillery locating radars and loitering drones able to spot artillery and attack it. 
  • Minefield breaching equipment. 
  • Opportunities to train Ukrainian forces in other countries, safe from Russian attack. 

In summary, General Zaluzhny’s aim appears to be getting this support and he knows that he has a better chance if he is frank and honest about the fact that the offensive has not met expectations. 

Currently, the situation is tough but Ukraine is far from being defeated, activities this week providing evidence that Ukraine is still in the fight. For instance, Ukraine continued to attack Bakhmut and has attacked and gained ground on the Orikihiv Axis. Likewise, Ukraine has defeated large Russian attacks at Avdiivka and Vuledhar as well as many small attacks across the frontline. Counting losses is difficult but based on Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) we can be reasonably certain that Ukraine retains significant combat power. Also, Ukraine has crossed the Dnipro River and may be able to produce unexpected results possibly taking advantage of Russia’s operational focus on Avdiivka to turn the southern flank.  The general’s statement is also probably designed to condition international expectations, so that if the operation fails it is not a surprise but if on the other hand the operation is successful, its impact on international supporters is increased.  

Ukraine has a foothold on the east bank of the Dnipro River between Kyrnky in the north and the Atonivsky road and rail bridges in the south, threatening the E57 and T2206 motorways that supply eastern Kherson about 80km from Crimea.  Russian sources report that Ukrainian forces are attacking at Oleshky, Krynky and Pischnanivka a village about 5km east of the river.  So far, Russia has been unable to push the Ukrainians off the east bank and there are (unsubstantiated) Russian reports Ukraine is massing forces on the west bank.

In my opinion, this operation is very high risk. However, I have been proven wrong before and a crossing may use different tactics to historical operations. The area that the crossing is threatening is relatively lightly defended so it is possible that Ukraine is looking at an operation like the Kharkiv Offensive in September 2022. Pushing very mobile light forces across the river supported by long-range rocket artillery to create havoc in the Russian rear, forcing units to withdraw east and south. This could either create a secure area for a larger force to cross or may force Russian forces to be redeployed from near Orikhiv increasing the chances of a break through on that axis.

The land campaign may be slipping into a period of stalemate, both sides tired and unable to press achieve momentum. A situation General Zaluzhny is warning his supporters about and preparing them to manage. However, in the next few weeks Ukraine still has an opportunity to create an opportunity for manoeuvre on the banks of the Dnipro. So, keep watching as the last act of 2023’s summer offensive plays out on the banks of the Dnipro River.



Ben Morgan is a bored Gen Xer and TDBs military blogger


  1. I have not read this article. There is no need to.

    The headline alone is sufficient to comment.

    Yah dreamin’ bro!

    There will be no stalemate. Russia will dictate the terms of any cessation of hostilities.
    I speculate that from a Russian political and military perspective the orders are
    ” Carry on, don’t stop”

    • Great comment Ed, Ben can’t handle the Truth, like that line from the Movie a “A Few Good Men”? The Ukraine Project Stalemate is code for the comprehensive & utter defeat of US/NATO & the entire West at the hands of Russia, they just can’t bring themselves to admitting the truth that this War has been lost & no amount of delusional commentary by Ben can change this REALITY! Propaganda & Lies & Spin only get you so far & don’t win Wars but Missiles, Bullets, Artillery, Manpower & Willpower do Ben because Russia has plenty, Ukraine & the West have exhausted all theirs & the panic of Zelensky & his Regime is very evident now that the US has abandoned them to move onto the Middle East & another Biden DEBACLE in Israel?

  2. Ben – With the USA/UK/EU signaling a pause in funding to Ukraine due to the Israel – Hamas war, its’ high time both Ukraine, and Russia held peace talks.

    • Neihana, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, that all you’ve got you’re a joke lol

        • We need peace and Putin can deliver that.
          We should do everything we can to create peace and drive terrorism and oppression out of our societies.
          All bigots should be shamed into oblivion.

          The Israelis need to find better ways to fight Hamas. The collateral damage resulting from their actions cannot be tolerated, it is only matched by the Hamas atrocities….. not forgetting the atrocities perpetrated to advance Putin’s Military action in Ukraine.

    • Why would Russia negotiate, they are days & months away from fully winning this War on THEIR TERMS not Ukraines & only Zelensky’s coke fuelled, complete surrender will sufface? Also, Ukraine & the West can’t be trusted to negotiate Peace Terms after they signed then tore up the Minsk Agreements that would have prevented this War in the first place! Putin’s ominous recent speech implied that Russia will reincorporate most of the artificially created 1991 Nation called Ukraine back into it’s former Territories of Russia, it had previously always been part of Russia for centuries & will return to it again, with the rubbish rump in the West being left for the Poles & Nazi’s to fight over! Goodbye Slava Ukraina, Hello Novorossiya! translated New Russia!

  3. The situation is complicated, and there is some truth in the stalemate claim, it being infinitely harder to achieve a determinate outcome than to revert to static defense.

    But for all its claims of a stalemate, Russia is making pretty profligate use of its vatniks to try to squeeze a few more metres out up north, hoping perhaps to thereby to reduce the pressure on its more vulnerable southwest.

    International commitments matter, and a few more ATACMs may allow Ukraine to achieve some of its main objectives in the south: cutting the Crimean supply route, interdicting movements south of Tokmak, or reclaiming the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.

    As the conflagration in the Middle East spreads, the West may want to bring the Ukraine issue to a close. Facilitating the demise of the Kerch bridge may deliver that outcome.

  4. Stalemate?
    Surely not Ben
    Russia is tired and scared (and probably emotional)
    Her recruits are poorly trained, ill equipped, the shovels are badly made and losing their handles , they’ve run out of stolen washing machines, morale is bad, the vodka’s not getting to the front line in time, and Putin’s body double has lost heart.Putin’s secret funeral used up the last coffin and there were only crusts to eat.
    Meanwhile the Ukrainian army is making huge advances, because they are morally superior and have access to wunderwaffen and have been highly trained.The infallible Leopards are making all the difference, just like the Javelins before them ,the Panzerfausen, Stingers , the Patriots,M72s,night goggles, bullet proof vests.
    How can you talk of stalemate?
    They’re halfway to Moscow you Pootsie stooge!

  5. Stalemate? Stalemate No.
    Let’s go to the dictionary;
    stalemate, noun, a situation in a competition in which neither side is able to win or make any progress.

    Russia is going to win this war, maybe by a little maybe by a lot but it will win, probably wrapping it up sometime in 2025. It would only be a stalemate if Ukraine can keep what they now hold indefinitely and they just can’t. All reports, east and west of the line say Russian recruitment and production is strong and getting stronger. Noth Korean stockpiles and factories are backstopping their military production and China is backstopping their civilian economy and international diplomacy. Meanwhile General Zaluzhny, who got his wish list fulfilled for the summer offensive, is coming back with another wish list full of things that are just not available or don’t even exist.
    It’s rather odd that you seem to think that the main block to the EU supplying enough artillery ammunition is some sort of unfortunate bureaucratic regulation. If the ammo was there and was needed that badly it would be sent, regulations be damned. “Inter arma enim silent leges”, “In times of war the laws fall silent” said good old Cicero. Which can have various interpretations, but one is the old peace time laws can be changed for war time. It doesn’t even have to be technically illegal, just draw up a new emergency regulation, everyone important enough puts up their hand and says yes and then it’s done. If political leaders aren’t supplying enough ammo because they demand the ammunition funds get spent locally i.e. in their own constituencies, then the problem isn’t red tape, it’s corruption.
    This war is putting stress right across the spectrum and all up and down the chains of supply and command. Links are beginning to snap. There are reasons for these failures but no excuses. Having one small Joker-King in Kiev, a bunch of squabbling Dukes and Princes in Brussels and an old and failing Emperor in Washington is only helping the Tsar in Moscow.
    In summary, The East wins and The West only has itself to blame.

  6. Many thanks for the commentary Ben – keep them coming and ignore the kindergarten comments (above).

    Someone said over a year ago that Russia has never fought a war without squandering at least half a million men in the process. Well, are we there yet? It cannot be far off.

    The front has stagnated only because the USA won’t give Ukraine the kit it needs: Long range ATACMS and air power. Given those, they could destroy Russia’s ammo dumps and rail connections in the rear and starve the front line.

    Both the start of the war and the current situation are on Biden and his incompetent administration. Biden triggered the war by attacking US domestic oil & gas production, thereby gifting Putin the revenue and misplaced strategic confidence to invade, then they drip fed the Ukraine with out-of-date weapons.

    Where the other commenters are entirely wrong is in thinking Russia can win. In the broadest sense Russia has already lost. It has lost 3-400,000 men in battle and maybe as many again of its best and brightest have left the country. This is a country with an already precipitous demographic situation that cannot afford to lose its youth. Its armoury is depleted, and its military have been shown to be third rate incompetents. Its arms export revenue has dried up because would-be purchasers have seen how out of date it all is. Its energy sector is moribund since the foreign extraction technologists have left so it’s just a matter of time before it’s wells freeze up and cannot be restarted. Oh, and the country is dead broke. Anyone want a cheap Russian bride?

    • Geez, you have to wonder how this conflict has reached an apparent stalemate, or stagnation, given how incompetent the Russian military are, according to you. Why would Ukraine need (additional) USA equipment, given the state of Russia’s military. Heck, Russian ammo dumps must be so depleted that they probably wouldn’t need attacking anyway.

      And Ukraine’s offensive, the amount of ground they must have advanced/regained must be significant given the state of the Russian military. Of course, if they haven’t, at the very least, recaptured a lot of ground, well, that most likely is because Russia never took much in the first place, given their incompetence.

      Yeah, it all adds up, useless at everything with barely two dimes to rub together. As such, this conflict should be all over, bar the shouting, pretty soon. And if not, well….

      Peace to Ukraine. Peace to Russia. Peace everywhere.

    • No, not Russian Wives but there’s plenty of Ukrainian Women & Widows for Sale to the highest bidder, there’s no more men left in Ukraine with 500k dead & over 1 million + permanently disabled & injured & millions having already left Ukraine!

      • It can hardly be a coincidence that more and more Ukrainian lonely-hearts phishing sex-trade messages are turning up in my junk files,
        Beautiful Ukrainian Girls Are Waiting to Meet You!
        Meet Hot Ukrainian Singles – See photos!
        Enjoy Dating Hot Ukrainian Singles etc. etc. etc.
        It would be very interesting to have accurate figures on the nationalities and changes in numbers of various sex workers, their employment agents in sex working locations worldwide. You and I both know what the common English terms are for such people and places, but the current political system depends on us keeping the euphemism treadmill turning.
        But our current political system is a great improvement on the old ones. back in ancient times when a tribe lost a war, all the men were killed, and the women were sold into slavery. Now the women sell themselves into slavery even before all the men have been killed.

    • No, not Russian Wives but there’s plenty of Ukrainian Women & Widows for Sale to the highest bidder, there’s no more men left in Ukraine with 500k dead & over 1 million + permanently disabled & injured & millions having already left Ukraine!

Comments are closed.