The Free Speech Union has welcomed the decision by the Independent Police Conduct Authority to review the inaction of police during the Let Women Speak event at Albert Park. 25,000 Kiwis signed a public letter denouncing the way speech rights were denied on that day, and we look forward to receiving the report, says Jonathan Ayling, Chief Executive of the Free Speech Union.
“Counter-speech and protest are basic rights guaranteed by free speech. Those who gathered on 25 March in Albert Park to express their opposition to Posie Parker’s beliefs were in their rights, and the Free Speech Union was prepared to defend them. We take no position on the substance of her claims. That is for individual New Zealanders to decide.
“However, violence, intimidation, and harassment are the opposite of free speech. Police failed to protect the rights of those who had gathered to hear the opinions of Posie Parker. There must be accountability for this inaction.
“Posie Parker has announced she will be returning to New Zealand in September this year. We anticipates further attempts to silence her, and undermine the rights of Kiwis to hear from her. Free speech guarantees not only the right to impart information, but also to receive it.
“The Free Speech Union is preparing to once again defend her entry into the country (as we did as interveners at the previous judicial review), and to ensure that the Thugs’ Veto does not once again silence her, or those wishing to hear from her.
“Through tolerance, counter-speech, and a dedication to non-violence, New Zealand can do better this time in response to her visit.”
Excellent. The New Zealand Police should most certainly not have been partisan on that day of shame. Hopefully their policy advisors will soon be stacking supermarket shelves – rather than being whisked over to the Education Dept to add to the sex and gender bouillabaisse brewing there, or getting exorbitant pay packages to peddle their myopic shutting-upping agendas elsewhere.
There should be the right to protest and publicly speak without having protesters drown out with whistles, attacked with liquids, punching out listeners, and so forth.
The police need to immediately remove counter protesters who stop the right of someone else to speak and try to derail free speech.
Counter protesters are trying to drown out a group speaking in NZ with whistles – the police should be quick to remove disruptive people so that the free speech can happen, even if they don’t agree with the speakers. It should not be the listeners who have to try and remove those disrupting events.
When political figures speak, whether council or central government as soon as a protestor tries to disrupt the police act to remove the protester. Why are police not doing this with other speakers in NZ – and expecting them to get private security etc – especially when the woke media and certain members of government are the ones inciting the violence against the people who don’t agree with them.
It should be a basic human right to speak or go and safely listen to a public speaker in NZ without aggressive and disruptive protestors who seek stop the event.