MEDIAWATCH: Stuff starts woke paywalls – we say MORE paywalls

16
947

After woke washing The Dominion Post, Stuff’s next move is to create woke paywalls for their woke social engineering journalism.

I’m guessing the gravity of Stuff’s debt structure is driving the paywall idea and it makes sense, it’s a smart play for Stuff, the woke are middle class and they want their own cult dogma repeated back to them until someone on Twitter declares that irrefutable woke fact is no longer part of the conclave dialectic, and then that belief is cast aside and never believed in the first place, so they will easily shell out $5 a week for that mantra to be endlessly repeated back into their faces.

Stuff can certainly make money paywalling their woke nonsense because the middle classes love woke nonsense, the incredible bonus to the rest of us is that we don’t have to bother responding to gated opinions because they lose influence.

Woke paywalls mean the rest of us can ignore them and allow the idea to die behind a paywall the way opinion does behind the NZ Herald paywall.

I say let’s get all of those wokies at Stuff behind a paywall!

Shouldn’t you have to pay to read Alison Mau’s 10 millionth column on how shit men are?

The danger is that the kind of journalism that Stuff manufactures is for a woke audience who is paying for it and who want their dogma repeated back to them so it becomes a self affirming echo chamber.

That isn’t journalism, that’s just telling people what they want to hear, we ask people to donate to TDB not because you like what we say (trust us, if you love us this week, you’ll be hating us next week), but because you see the need to have an independent media that call it the way it sees it without pandering to readers already established belief systems.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

I applaud Stuff going behind a paywall and beg then to put all their columnists behind it so Stuff can become as irrelevant as the NZ Herald’s Paywall opinion section.

This strategy makes Today FM look successful.

Build that (pay)Wall! Build that (pay) Wall!

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media

16 COMMENTS

  1. Someone should ask Stuff a question about how the Public Good Journalism Funding operates alongside a paywall?

    Is the content outside the paywall going to be just the PGJF content? And nothing from that journalist behind the paywall?

    I hope Stuff dies. It’s a terrible media outlet.

  2. Ada – Great point…if the media outlet recent public funding – then it cannot put public funded news behind an private paywall…

  3. 100% Martyn!

    Journalists have to face up to the fact that there is generally a better informed opinion available for free somewhere else, and they’re no longer the righteous gatekeepers of The Truth.

  4. It’s not stuffs fault. Fairfax had it and bought TradeMe to ensure that the advertising revenue it was losing to the internet was in their hands still so they could carry on. But Spin told them to liquidate anything saleable and pocket the proceeds and force the entity to continue on lean and mean resources – just try harder you fat and slothful satisfied underlings. So the managers fresh from the business intellectual-boot-camps who have had their curlicues twisted into The Right Shape and their speech centres in the brain elaborated so that they are ready to later accept the AI chip. One must admit that marvellous things have resulted from a $1 asking price.

    • Greywarbler – Those “journalists” cannot spell, and reuse Government – Corporate Media Statements as reporting…whose fault is that?

      • I was trying for ynori Nathan. Don’t take any notice of what I write as it is often very similar to a fart, but better out than in as the coarse say.

  5. Should the headline be:

    Stuff are to stuff themselves!

    Great point Ada – who would have the journalist to ask?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.