I’ve asked why Peter Ellis could only get justice after death.
I’ve asked questions about the appalling Police interrogation tactics in this dreadful miscarriage of justice.
And I’ve asked how a modern city in this day and age could have become convinced of a satanic death cult working at their local creche.
Now, let’s ask if the Woke can celebrate the Peter Ellis case, because that gives us more insight than anything else as to whether or not this obscenity could occur again today.
Unfortunately the answer is a resounding yes.
The Holy Trinity of Woke Dogma is the following:
ALL white people are irredeemable cross burning racists.
B-E-L-I-E-V-E EVERY woman that ALL men are rapists.
Anyone supporting free speech is a uniform wearing Nazi who hates the trans Community.
REMEMBER – there is NO wriggle room in that above Holy Trinity of Woke Dogma, and if you do joke about that Holy Trinity or question its tenants of faith, you are immediately cancelled and sacked from any employment you have!
For the Woke, they can’t celebrate Peter’s legal victory because as far as they are concerned, the victims are right.
When you MUST B-E-L-I-E-V-E ALL victims, you have to claim that the children who say they were abused by Peter WERE ABUSED by Peter.
There are NO exemptions.
Sure, Police investigating the case had inappropriate sexual relationships with many of the solo mothers complaining.
Sure, ACC paid out $10 000 to everyone who claimed they had been abused by Peter.
Sure, investigators led children with leading questions to get the answers they wanted.
Sure, children claimed Peter had killed some children and buried them at the creche when there were no bodies found and no one listed missing.
Sure, all those things, BUT you must B-E-L-I-E-V-E ALL victims and that’s why the Peter Ellis case can’t be celebrated by the woke, because the families of the children still claim he did it (despite several of those children having recanted their evidence and confessing he never touched them sexually ever).
Every allegation must be taken seriously and investigated professionally, but to B-E-L-I-E-V-E ALL victims is like a faith based religion for the woke.
Do any of us believe that if these allegations were made today on Twitter by a solo mother claiming a heteronormative white cis male was molesting their child at a creche that Twitter wouldn’t immediately convict him and have him sacked from his job?
We mock the people of Christchurch for bewilderingly believing a satanic sex cult was operating at their creche, but do we honestly believe it would be different now?
We all failed Peter, and I think we would fail him again.
This is NZ now.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media
Peter may have been gay, but that doesn’t make up for being white and male…
The childrens’ reported ‘lived experience’ outweighed any need for actual evidence.
c’mon ada he was railroaded but his whiteness wasn’t the issue this was well before all that kicked in…it was small minded NZ plus a cabal of mad women and some of the worst police work in history coupled with a politically motivated judiciary….no this one is on NZ no one else.
Cheers Gargarin, I was more responding to Martyn’s view that today another Peter Ellis would be treated the same way and convicted, but under a different hysteria.
Peter Ellis’ whiteness wasn’t an issue in Christchurch in the 1990s – I think it was and still is NZ whitest city.
I’ve posted elsewhere on TDB that alongside the Police’s abject failure and loss of common sense, that the trial judge, the Court of Appeal, and Nat ministers should also hang their heads in shame.
And they should be treated that way by the rest of us.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/steve-braunias-on-peter-ellis-case-moral-panic-contaminated-evidence-and-an-innocent-ghost/P7BIKAC7ISYIXNNS6YSAFIUA4E/
Link paywalled, Ada.
absolutely ada the ‘judicial reviews’ were clearly political in nature
Without any shadow of a doubt, he would be found guilty in the current context. Worse than that any person who supported him would also be cancelled. There would never be any attempt to examine the truth because of the self limiting censorship that cancel culture tends to engender. This coupled with a media that is corpulent on righteous excoriation and the exclusion of truth that interrupts the accepted narrative. Any man who has the unfortunate experience of being morally judged by Police, then subjected to Justice (which is theoretically blind, but functionally deaf) where allegations alone have become the evidential threshold is GUILTY irrespective of whether or not they have committed any crime. I have said this before, any person who continues to have faith in Police to acquit their actual role without bias or outright corruption has not had any direct dealings with them.
This fractured landscape that tells men they are always guilty, worthless because they are penis havers will lead to a very dark place.
#mentoo
So strange…there was Howard Broad and Colin Eade having prayer meetings in the Police Station against the satanic cults, and there were the hard left Creche mums.
not hard left just mad as cut snakes.