135 000 children in Poverty isn’t a success

10
443

MSD shows that children in poverty has dropped slightly

Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) welcomes the findings in the latest MSD Child Poverty Report showing that material hardship rates for many children had improved between 2013-21, thanks to government measures, rising employment rates, improving wages and the growing number of private charities.

…I’m sorry but as far as I am concerned, 135 000 children in poverty is nothing to celebrate for the following reasons.

  • Firstly why is it always a focus on children in poverty? Our neoliberal mythology states all success is individual meaning all failure is personal as well, so if adults are in poverty, fuck them! We have 135 000 kids in poverty, but we also have about 700 000 adults living in poverty as well but there is no sympathy for them, only the little children.
  • Secondly when we are spending 1million a day to kettle beneficiaries and these children into dangerous Motels, that is not a success.
  • Thirdly, we are spending a billion dollars per year on consultants while 135 000 kids live in poverty so don’t fucking tell me we don’t have money to help them!
  • Fourthly, none of the recommendations of the Welfare Advisory Group have been adopted making this exercise merely a bureaucratic counting job, not a do anything about the problem job!

All we have is a counting ‘wellness’ exercise with no actual focus on lifting these people’s standard of living.

All MSD have done here is successfully count misery with no way to actually deal with the poverty they are counting!

Yay?

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

10 COMMENTS

  1. We used to have people like Sue Bradford standing up for people in poverty. Thanks to Sue on their behalf. Perhaps a new beneficiaries leader allied to the newly aware union movement may be able to get things moving?
    Something really needs to give as JA, the almighty PM and self-nominated Poverty Minister, hasn’t got a single brain focused on this portfolio or her team of 5 million!
    Ha bloody ha, sickest joke you could ever have. We could NEVER have imagined such a fiasco??? And don’t mention Oranga Tamariki.
    Labour are trashed and watch for more ministers to be slinking out the door before the end of summer.

  2. “All MSD have done here is successfully count misery with no way to actually deal with the poverty they are counting!”

    The survey only covered people in private accommodation prior to the COVID pandemic so how successfully MSD counted misery is debatable and even the headline of ‘improvement’ outside of the limited survey group may be misleading. For example NOT including families living in motels is strange oversight. Surely living in motels, garages and cars is the sharpest of the sharp end of child poverty and those numbers have all gone up.

    This feels like a political release for the optics of ‘good news’. It is hard to believe a limited pre-covid survey is representative of the situation today.

    CPAG says “the true extent of child poverty in Aotearoa is likely to be much worse than portrayed”.
    https://www.cpag.org.nz/media-releases/ministry-of-social-development-msd-child-poverty-report-2022-highlights-need-to-support-struggling-families

  3. ” Firstly why is it always a focus on children in poverty? Our neoliberal mythology states all success is individual meaning all failure is personal as well, so if adults are in poverty, fuck them! We have 135 000 kids in poverty, but we also have about 700 000 adults living in poverty as well but there is no sympathy for them, only the little children.
    Secondly when we are spending 1million a day to kettle beneficiaries and these children into dangerous Motels, that is not a success.
    Thirdly, we are spending a billion dollars per year on consultants while 135 000 kids live in poverty so don’t fucking tell me we don’t have money to help them!
    Fourthly, none of the recommendations of the Welfare Advisory Group have been adopted making this exercise merely a bureaucratic counting job, not a do anything about the problem job!

    When the merger is complete I will expect these pertinent questions to be put to Adern and the other working class heroes.

    Or Bomber you could pull off the perfect interview coup and ask your old mate Jacinda to front up on the working group.

  4. These children are mostly born into poverty .Surely the parents need to be helped to stop having children they cannot afford until they can afford them .If we do not act then the circle will continue.

  5. why we only focus on childhood poverty? Because focusing on our adult/parent/grandparents poverty rates in this country would really rattle some cages.

    • Sme reason ‘World Childfund’, or whatever, concentrate on children — sells better. Why I preferred Oxfam — not so much anymore, hte the hrdsell of even secular charities these days. On the other hand, it has been great for mobilizing our country ginst poverty these last five years. annoying Jcind cos of her commitment. Her vile, insincere, neolib ‘commitment’.

  6. There is always an element of society who seem to have no issue with being impoverished, providing the state provides for them. Having said that, turning the great ship of John’s and Bill’s beloved low wage economy will take some time.

  7. “Instead of war on poverty. They got a war on drugs so the police can bother me.”

    From the song ‘Changes’ by Tupac Shakur

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.