Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

17 Comments

  1. “Triggered” is a really pretty easy term to explain. It’s used to describe the uncontrollable compulsion to emotionally react to something. e.g. a tweet/comment or an event.
    For example, “I don’t think humans have nearly as much impact on global warming as scientists claim”, instantly “triggers” people here at The Daily Blog to respond (often aggressively with ad-hominums). Left-leaning people tend to be more easily “triggered” than the right (not sure why that is really, more emotionally driven perhaps?). Consequently, you see the term generally used far more often toward the left by the right.

    1. Eh? The right in general are way more easily triggered. Way more. There’s no competition. Just have to say hi to one then oh my god, it all comes out.

      Same with the left getting triggered because there own guy, David Cunlif may have been prime minister so let’s attack his character. That was election rigging Standard style.

      So try finding some army vets and mention Nikki Hagers name, omg it all comes out.

      Or God DOSNT have the magic powers. Triggered…

      Most people who trigger people will be lynched by an angry mob that has no way to realise or care that its not real. This then causes issues when normies have no way of releasing the anger. People can make others feel fear, anger, love and everything else, we store it in others, it’s not gained. So there maybe upper tier practitioners creating angry mobs and possibly fall straight to chaos for revenge. There might be a handful of chaos plots where the cultists try to disguise their effects as a trigger or a few instances where circumstances lead to a desired effect/outcome being considered, but most triggers would be even more oppression and rebellion.

      1. Yeah, you totally have a point. The right are also instantly triggered by “we’re going to raise taxes” or in the US with “we want to ban assault rifles”. It all boils down to a simple knee-jerk reaction to a different point of view to something. My bad.

    2. Well if you want to start your history at Trump. I mean 70 million GOP voters get triggered by climate change. Then deny, deny, deny.

  2. Difficult to understand what would prompt a supposedly intelligent human being to oppose the elimination of single use plastic bags, one of the most ubiquitous and deadly-to-life by-products of our Disposable-Consumer Culture?

    It so happens that one of the supposedly highest educated electorates in the country votes for a supposedly intelligent human who is opposed the elimination of single use plastic bags.

    1. Maybe they’re not that clever, Peter? It takes more than high education to gain insight, but you knew that right?

  3. The last piece to 2018 is pure comedy. Fran O’Sullivan…

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12183974

    Particularly this extract…

    “It’s more important than ever before that journalism does what it should and holds the powerful to account, in particular in business and government, where they do have the ability to strongly influence New Zealand and people’s livelihoods,” says O’Sullivan, who was honoured for services to journalism and business.

    Why more important now than ever? Why not when Key was creating a divide in N.Z.? Why not when Bennett was releasing personal details of beneficiaries and why not when Christchurch earthquake victims were being spied on? For fuck sake Fran, there is a reason people don’t take bias media for real. The time for real journalism was within the past 9 years yet all you did Fran was to write articles to protect your right wing beliefs.

    1. Classic piece from O’Sullivan Bert. Classic.

      When I read it, I wasn’t sure if I should laugh, cry or yell in rage. However it stunned me more than anything else, considering how msm journalists bowed and scraped to Natz during its nine year tenure of treachery!

      But wait. There’s more. Msm still blow kisses to Natz, even when it’s in opposition! Who/what is pulling media’s chain?

  4. A comprehensive list Frank. I look forward to part 2. There are a rew I coukd add to your summary, but we’d end up with a short YearBook. Now there’s a thought for you!!

    I hope you mention climate change in part 2. That is the greatest threat facing our species

  5. Not sure Shane Jones is ready to bury neoliberalism just yet – the billion dollar proposed hydrogen grant goes to a project that would make it from natural gas – so not carbon neutral at all. A shame, because a lot of his other decisions are surprisingly credible.

  6. Triggered, for example people who have been abused by the police, dealing with their presence in their own safe space at a pride event.

    The reference is to psychological impact, not the more common political reaction.

  7. As to whom was at risk of being triggered at the pride parade

    – those victims of the lack of inclusive management by police of those who are not normative male or female.

    It was thus a public protest/call for police to do better in this area.

    You raise the issue of inclusiveness, without realising many of the parade were of groups impacted by police practice.

      1. Sounds more like you do not care if those not normative male and female have safe spaces, in police stations or on the parade.

        It’s an appropriate response to police not providing safe spaces to deny them a place on the parade. And in this context entirely reasonable.

Comments are closed.