Govt medicinal cannabis Bill a huge step but should go further

By   /   December 22, 2017  /   5 Comments

TDB recommends Voyager - Unlimited internet @home as fast as you can get

The Government’s medicinal cannabis Bill is a huge step in the right direction – and a first for any New Zealand government – but we think a patient-focused approach should go much further.

The Government’s medicinal cannabis Bill is a huge step in the right direction – and a first for any New Zealand government – but we think a patient-focused approach should go much further.

Here’s what the Bill will do:

  • The Misuse of Drugs (Medicinal Cannabis) Amendment Bill will enable cannabis-based products to be manufactured under licence in New Zealand, and sold in pharmacies, and sets standards they must meet. This is expected to take two years to set up. Details remain unclear;
  • In the mean time, the Bill creates a statutory defence for terminally ill patients to possess and use illicit cannabis and to possess a cannabis utensil;
  • Cannabidiol (CBD) and CBD products will no longer be classed as controlled drugs.

It is great that the Government recognises a compassionate approach to terminally ill patients is needed, and full credit to them for that. But what about non-terminal patients? Labour campaigned to “legalise medicinal cannabis” for people with terminal conditions or in chronic pain – so why can’t the Government now show that amnesty to everyone who has a doctor recommend cannabis?

There will be no legal way for terminal patients to obtain their medicine, and without a patient register the cops could still take a terminal person’s meds. They just couldn’t convict them. While many terminally ill patients will benefit from the proposed legal defence, it still exposes them to arrest and prosecution, and gives no protection to their providers, who are often family members. The 12-month limit also seems arbitrary.

Removing the ban on domestic production is also a potential game changer. Cannabis meds made in NZ are likely to be cheaper, but this is not certain, and will take several years. Will it be a corporate pharmaceutical-style scheme like Australia is getting, which has not yet benefited patients, or a more compassionate regime that allows small-scale production and allows patients to produce our own medicine?

Current pharma-grade cannabis products are ten times the cost of illicit cannabis, which is itself ten times the cost of growing your own. If we are serious about affordability we should also allow self-provision of natural forms of cannabis, which is common overseas.

Many patients using cannabis medicinally do not smoke it, but prefer to vape or use balms, tinctures, juices or smoothies. These should all be allowed as homegrown herbal remedies.

Such an approach would be possible under the Green Party medicinal cannabis Bill, which better provides for patient access. Certainly it is more closely alinged to NORML’s four-point model for good medicinal cannabis law reform:

  1. Patient focused: safe affordable access to botanical cannabis;
  2. Immediate effect(not just a long-term development pathway);
  3. Domestic production: via licenced providers, including small scale providers (families & individuals);
  4. Self provision: choice to grow/make your own herbal remedy.

Both Bills are now before the House. The Government Bill will be whipped and is sure to pass – we will have an opportunity to improve it during the select committee process.

The Greens’ Bill, now in the name of drug policy spokesperson Chloe Swarbrick, will be a conscience vote. Not all Labour or NZ First MPs will vote for it. But National may allow enough of their MPs to vote for it to pass at least the first reading, where it could join the Government Bill before the Health Select Committee.

After being excluded from the policy making process to date, patients and providers should be represented on the proposed Advisory Committee.

At the forefront of our minds as we assess the two Bills and seek ways to improve them is to ask: What would Helen Kelly do? I think she would say we have to push for more.

***
Want to support this work? Donate today
***
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
***

About the author

Chris Fowlie

Former editor of NORML News, Chris Fowlie is president of the National Organisation for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, manager of The Hempstore, and court-recognised expert witness for serious cannabis charges.

5 Comments

  1. Aaron says:

    So if someone grows their own for medicinal purposes they wont’ be prosecuted for possession but can they be prosecuted for growing/production?

    • Dave says:

      I find the Labour government is a bit disappointing with regards to the cannabis debate or indeed the illicit drug usage in NZ.
      The medical cannabis bill is simply one small step forward from the previous government stance.
      Decriminalisation of cannabis would have been the bolder and more progressive policy.
      Some have said that decriminalization of cannabis could decimate the P industry, if so it’s worth considering. It may even have a positive impact on alcohol consumption, the social and economic outcomes could be huge.
      But we won’t do this .

      • Strypey says:

        Labour and NZ First have promised us a referendum on decriminalising recreational use of herbal cannabis at or before the next election. We need to push hard to make sure the question asked at this referendum goes as far as possible towards the reform we need – especially that it also legalises grow-your-own – and that the “yes” vote wins it. Once that happens, allowing herbal cannabis for patients will be a no-brainer.

        We must resist any attempts to divide the cannabis law reform movement into single issues and turn us against each other (eg medicinal vs. recreational), because clearly a win on any aspect is a step forward for all. Allowing licensed growing of hemp hasn’t changed the world overnight, but it did help the debate move forward, and not supporting it because it didn’t give us everything we wanted would have been self-defeating.

  2. Me says:

    While I am grateful for this, the smallest most insignificant step the govt could have taken I feel for the people cannabis could have helped.
    The people who might get better, people on chemotherapy and anyone subjected to our justice system. Where is the justice?
    If marijuana was legal Amy Winehouse and Micheal Jackson might still be alive today.