GUEST BLOG: John Stroh – Learning from History and what it really means to “AVOID AMERICA”

5
15

screen-shot-2016-11-11-at-3-28-17-pm

It’s a good line, ‘’we should learn from History”, but what if there’s no-one willing or able to help us learn. What if the teachers have been trained by those who would have us cow-tow to American commercial interests and the world’s leading neo-liberal power structures? What if, we are so tantalised by the comforts ensuing from an American lead jihad on ‘the good life’ that we stubbornly resist facing our nemesis in order to, perhaps, recover our humanity?

I am not an historian, but I did grow up in post WW2 Europe. I was educated in the best traditions of the war-mongers of our time; the French, English, Russian and Austrian ways of compelling others to do their will. I left for the New World in my early twenties. I had been duly educated in the finer points and subtleties of racism, fascism and the misogynist practices of the privileged elite of my generation at the ‘best’ schools.

Influencing other countries to conform to an elitist value system, such as that promoted by neo-liberal thinking, does not always require the placement of sleepers, the deployment of deep cover agents or even the presence of trained soldiers in mufti and counter-intelligence officers operating under the immunity of diplomatic cover. With sufficient, purpose specific vocabulary and some tasty morsels of commercial interest that can be deployed to seduce the unwitting, the entrenchment of status quo and the preservation of elitist class structures is all but guaranteed – as long as no-one rocks the boat too hard.

Not an etymologist, nor a psychiatrist, psychologist or for that matter any other ‘ist’ am I, one who is awarded status and authority to make determinations over what is good, bad or ugly. But, I smell a rat hidden within the sheep’s clothing of at least one word that is finding increased use amongst those indirectly promoting American neo-liberalism.

One such word is ‘isolationism’ and this is how the argument goes for those who cite isolationism: America’s Trump is establishing its right to focus on its national interests ahead of that of all other countries on earth. It is doing this by implementing isolationist strategies, laws, policies and programs. This is designed to boost its own commercial interests and make it a great country once again. Many other countries don’t like this. Retaliation with isolationist strategies only serves to acerbate the situation, so other countries must go along with the dictates of the lead dog.

It is worth noting that under this model of economic co-operation, it is only the view of the lead dog that changes. For many years the perfume of this approach served as our sniffing glue until our man Lange detected Uranium on their breath. We woke up one day and realised that we were on a little island in the Southern Ocean and that it probably didn’t matter if we showed them the finger. Or was it something else? Was it that we were finding our identity? Were we making a stand for what we believed was right? The consequences would be dire for our economy, they said. The sun would no longer rise in the east and any chance New Zealand might have to remain a constructive participant at any and all levels of human endeavour would cease to exist and that was thirty years ago that they told us this…

Even doddery Bolger and ditzy Shipley had the decency to understand that New Zealand had a unique national identity to protect, one that was strenuously attempting to heal the wounds of history; but then along came fact-free-Key. His position on the Husky team is way down the ranks as he jostles to maintain his head high so as not be afflicted by the increasing potency of the stench emanating from today’s America.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Another concept to reflect on is that of the narcissist megalomaniac, probably the only stereotype capable of truly rocking today’s neo-liberal boat. Trump is the epitome of this particular stereotype and as such, one that we have not seen since Adolf Hitler wooed the suckers who fell for his particular seductive style of fascist authoritarianism.

So is this man a blessing in disguise? Is he the saviour who will lift the dense layers of fog that befuddle Americans? Will he put an end to failed and corrupt neo-liberal ethics and return the country to the style of liberal socialism envisioned by its founding fathers? Or should we look for parallels with 1930s Germany? America will change under Trump’s Presidency. Checks and balances aside, if even a fraction of this man’s ideas are implemented, they will be in the vein of his historical role model. This we call not learning from history.

And that is why I ask, is it time to let go of America? Not, out of outrage over either Mr Trump or Mrs Clinton, nor over their respective supporters, but because of the instability that the new political reality brings with it.

This month’s 9/11 (NZ time) debacle in America reverberates uncomfortably in many communities across the world. It sets a new low standard for systemic political mayhem not seen since the time before the surprise invasion of Poland in 1939. There are as many possible outcomes now as there were then. For that reason alone it would seem prudent to re-assess our collective position as one of many small Southern Ocean communities. It may be foolish to now sit back and allow an egocentric narcissist like Mr Trump influence who we are or who we become as a nation. Easier said than done, but doing nothing is not an option even if our current Government chooses to turn a blind eye.

This is a wake-up call for the world to realise how unsavoury America has become and it does not help that over sixty percent of Americans disapproved of the two candidates on offer. The American people allowed this to happen. Part of any healing process is the phase in which we must learn to let go, but this is a difficult process when the media feeds on the object of our anger, grief or disappointment, a US President. Must it be?

What if we choose to disengage? What if we just “AVOID AMERICAN”? A handy slogan that may offer a generalised path to letting go of America, thereby allowing ourselves to consciously denounce the unhealthy and extreme neo-liberal values that have driven America to where it is today.

The spectacular emergence of repugnant, fascist, racist and misogynous personalities who will now rule the world’s hitherto most powerful country is more than just uncomfortable. So what can we do in our daily lives to safeguard our sanity and political integrity? The proposition at hand is to let go of America as a strategy for life and as a way of contributing to the healing our own communities that are breaking under the weight of failed neo-liberal politics.

“AVOID AMERICAN” has no rules, no members and no affiliations. It is a way of life that will find as many expressions as there are people to live it. People will require different levels of relief to appease their bad conscience, the one that tells them that they have contributed to the problem: living in the delusion that neo-liberal interpretation of democratic principles has worked. For some it will be useful to systematically evaluate their TV and social media preferences, their spending habits and group affiliations. For others it may just be an unorderly set of priorities that lead to more distance from things and beliefs American. And these priorities, expressed as intent, may change in nature and intensity over time, as relief sets in.

For instance, I commit to stop buying or using any American imports wherever possible, particularly in Supermarkets. I will try to identify Country of Origin on any product that I intend to purchase. I will deliberately avoid succumbing to the temptation of evaluating new American social media. I will stop using Facebook and Facebook Messenger on a regular basis, perhaps altogether – will see how it goes. I will stop using Apple and Google products as far as possible and will phase out my use of my Gmail account. Bill Gates products and Mozilla software will be forced exceptions to the “AVOID AMERICAN” rule at this stage and I will continue to use Bing as a search engine. It may take a while to find replacements for Google’s Android operating system and some apps.

In cases where it’s difficult to avoid buying American goods, I will attempt to purchase second hand product that is already in New Zealand. When purchasing new product, I will make every possible effort to avoid purchasing anything with components that are made in the USA. I will always award higher priority to non-American services when making purchase decisions.

I will no longer read media published in the US (I’ll leave that to more robust individuals at the Daily Blog for dissection). I have already eliminated all desktop and browser shortcuts to US owned business and media web-sites. I rely on Democracy Now, Aljazeera, the Intercept and the Daily Blog for news. It will take time to weed out American product and services from my daily life.

I am sad that this world of ours is manifesting itself in this way in the later stage of my life. I had always hoped that we were making progress towards a kinder, safer world in which fascism, racism and misogyny had a lesser presence. America now even seems to be finding new ways of rationalising the deliberate destruction of our planet. I think we have become very good at looking the other way and pretending all is well with our democracy – especially those of us with enough education to keep out of the poverty trough. There are many things most of our generation could have and should have done to postpone this blatant resurgence of a darker world. I am sad that the next generation will have to re-engage and work through those challenging battles that we discovered in the nineteen sixties and seventies and I hope that the global community can find ways to reverse the repugnant trends that America is setting for our world.

 

About John Stroh
Following a professional and management career with IBM in New Zealand and overseas, John owned and managed small companies in IT, niche market food exports to Japan and business consultancy. After his first wife, Annie, died in 2010, John ‘retired’ and spent several years in the remote outer Sounds. Now a Gold Card holder, he has remarried, has a husband & wife landscaping business and lives in an old farm homestead near Christchurch.

5 COMMENTS

  1. My dear friend,
    Well over 51 % of the popular vote were against Trump but still … he was elected. Now, the question is how to fight fashistoide trends, how to safeguard or better improve democracy and its institutions which have not held up well in the last years. Not only an American phenomenon, among present day democracies (Turkey, Israel, Hungary, Poland, the French right, etc.) not speaking about China and esp. Russia or the many other small dictatorships, etc. Now fight this with a boycott, which inevitably hurts all parts of these countries and increases antagonisms between countries will lead – and quickly – to trade wars and real wars. On a personal level boycott where do you draw the line?
    I am afraid we need to find other ways.

    • I am listening to John Pilger (http://johnpilger.com/), to some extent. The issue, unfortunately, is that it is not just Trump and his supporters who are the problem for the planet; nor just that the next US administration is looking more and more like a mid 1930s German nightmare. It is the fundamental collapse of economic, commercial and social ethics in the world’s largest economy that threatens the health of the planet. The fact is that America has for many years been behaving and continues to behave in the manner of the lead dog in a pack of huskies and taking us all to places I personally would like to avoid. I’m just saying people need to be either consciously in or out. How they express that is their business, but cruising along pretending the sun shines out of theirs is not an option for me.

    • Yes Christian,

      I imagine many people will attempt to find other ways, but I had not intended to give the impression that Trump and his constituency are the only factors that revolt me about America today. John Pilger (http://johnpilger.com/) has been doing some very interesting investigative reporting that I trust.

      The American political, economic, commercial and social system are broken and not even the millions of very good people in America have been able to turn things around. I am under no illusion that my personal choice to Avoid American is a form of isolationism, but the argument that this will acerbate the situation is flawed.

      New Zealand has stood up to American nuclear militarism in the past. I have tried to make the case for people to have the courage to make the personal sacrifices required to let go of America as far as they can. It would seem to be a healthy thing to do.

  2. John,

    Firstly, thank you for your blogpost and taking the time to share your thoughts with us. As someone who has written a few myself, I know the time and dedication it requires.

    “Avoiding America” sounds fine in principle. Hell, I’ll probably do it as much as possible, especially at the supermarket where Country of Origin can be ascertained. (Who knew that the iconic ‘Oreo Cookies’ for sale at our supermarkets were made – not from our American cuzzies – but in China?! I kid you not. It’s there in tiny lettering, beneath where the ‘Ingredients’ are listed.)

    However, the reach of the American Empire is more than just the services (Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc); entertainment, or products it offers to the rest of the global population.

    The most far-reaching aspect of US cultural colonialism is with it’s ideas.

    Neo-liberalist ideas emanated from the Chicago School of Economics. They were picked up by Thatcher and Reagan. And by Roger Douglas and our local, home-grown “Business Roundtable” (now known as the so-called “NZ Initiative”).

    The ideas were largely “free”; promulgated globally, and picked up by misguided individuals who then applied it to their own nations.

    Herein New Zealand, we know how that went, from 1984 onward.

    Part of the enabling of neo-liberalism lay with the collapse of the former-Soviet Union.

    If we take the Cold War, in part, as a “contest of economic ideas”, then centralised economic planning failed, and western free enterprise capitalism won. The latter offered ‘goodies’ which the former often could not. (And Soviet repression of dissidents also added a nail to the coffin of their system.)

    Sure, it could be argued that Soviet-style socialism wasn’t real socialism. (Which I agree, it wasn’t.)

    But in the public’s mind, they identified the Soviet system with socialism; their system collapsed; and capitalism won the “race” for credibility.

    Neo-liberalism piggy-backed onto capitalism’s victory, and this was proven by Labour (1980s) and National rolling back many of our own socialist successes (asset sales, free prescriptions, greater reliance of private providers, etc).

    Neo-liberalism succeeded because there was no counter-weight to it with ideas. Socialism had been discredited by the failure of the Soviet system. So capitalism had been “proven to be correct”.

    The same can be applied to Trumpism.

    We can boycott US goods and services (not entirely possible), but it’s the ideas that remain influential and most pernicious.

    And one thing that the Left understands with crystal clarity is that ideas are more powerful than any physical weapon.

    How do we counter the ideas of Trumpism?

    The irony here is at it’s richest; Trump advocates economic nationalism and (perhaps) a form of isolationism. But Trumpism will cross borders like water through our fingers.

    Ideas do not respect national borders.

    • Firstly, thank you Frank for taking the time to add some valuable historic context. Your observations lead me to many more questions. Thank you.

      I follow Noam Chomsky whose latest interview on Aljazeera is a cracker (http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/2016/11/upfront-special-noam-chomsky-trump-era-161125114959227.html).

      One of the points Chomsky makes is that there is a significant difference between Adolf Hitler and Trump. Adolf was an ideologue. Trump is an ignorant, thin-skinned megalomaniac; vacuous; he has no known political positions, he’s basically a showman.

      I’m not sure there is such a thing as “Trumpism”, certainly not yet. His behaviour is too inconsistent. The fundamental danger the planet now faces, is the unpredictability of a narcissist who is likely to continue making decisions based on his ego-centric view of the world. He could throw a tantrum at any point in time and allow the random “ideas” that are carried by the people around him to vent.

      As John Minto pointed out yesterday, “We can analyse their {National’s} policies to death but unless we are prepared to act against them then we are complicit with them.” That same principle applies with American policies. Longe got at least that one right.

      At this point in time there seems little public appetite to act politically at all. We are all too busy consuming or keeping our noses out of the poverty trough. Our hope in the longer term, as Chomsky points out in the interview, is that a majority of young people who voted, voted against Trump. We need the majority of young people who vote in New Zealand, to vote – first against National as the greater of the two mainstream evils. I don’t have much faith in the current Labour or Green leadership, so perhaps the best we can do is to deliberately invite experienced activists out of the woodwork to help inject new voters with the type of political passion that my generation was fortunate enough to experience in the 60s and 70s. We fought ideas effectively then and we need to pass on what we learned in a more deliberate manner.

Comments are closed.