Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

12 Comments

  1. Not just climate change being meaningless in NZ, officials erect a predator proof fence to preserve biodiversity and then leave gates in and out open, so that idiots can walk their dogs and play cricket in the sanctuary????? WTF!

    Auckland shorebird chicks stood on and starving to death due to ‘selfish’ beachgoers
    “Shorebird chicks at Auckland’s popular Omaha Beach are dying before they reach adulthood due to beachgoers disturbing them in their sanctuary, a bird study group says.”
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/300182022/auckland-shorebird-chicks-stood-on-and-starving-to-death-due-to-selfish-beachgoers

  2. NZ government are hypocrites on everything environmental. Delay, Delay, Delay, fishing camera’s on boats… and why do fishing companies prefer migrant fishers, probably because they don’t know the laws of NZ!

    “Journalism student Andrew Brew was having a quiet beer in a Lyttelton pub one night when he got chatting to a fisherman.

    The man told Brew he’d just come off a fishing boat after being at sea for a few weeks. Shark-obsessed from a young age, Brew asked him if he ever came across any great whites. To his surprise, he replied “we catch them all the time”.

    Brew was taken aback – he knew they were a protected species and assumed it would be a rare occurrence. But this was nothing on what he would admit to next, when the fisherman told him he finned them for extra money. The student was sceptical. Finning great whites is illegal and carries a hefty fine and possible jail time.

    And then the fisherman told him “I can show you on video”.

    The footage, which Brew recorded on his phone, shows a juvenile great white shark lying on a pile of fish in the holding well of a boat, turning over in what’s described as a ‘death roll’ before a fisherman jumps atop the shark, slapping it and pulling at its mouth, pretending to make it speak.

    When pressed, the fisherman gave Brew a detailed story behind the shark’s capture, explaining how they finned them and threw their bodies – often still alive – back into the ocean. They would then stop in a secluded bay where the fins would be offloaded. The fisherman’s understanding is they were being exported to Vietnam and Hong Kong, where they fetched up to US$10,000 per kilogram.

    “I said ‘It’s illegal in New Zealand and great whites are a protected species’. And he said ‘Everyone’s doing it. They sell for big bucks. It’s quick and easy. And it’s my livelihood’,” Brew recalled.

    That’s when Brew asked the fisherman if he had any moral issues about what he was doing. “He’s like, ‘No, not really. We’ve got families to feed – the quicker we are, the more cash we earn. We won’t be able to do it forever as they’re introducing cameras on boats, but boats that don’t have cameras will continue until they do. It’s rife’.”

    https://www.newsroom.co.nz/viewingroom/claim-great-whites-finned-alive-in-nz-waters

  3. But we have no real left wing party to vote for, e.g a Pa Aotearoa party.
    So ‘Labour’ have us cornered, with no real option but to let them get away with their lying and this insulting and annoying ‘neokindness’.

  4. ‘personally I believe we are beyond the tipping point where we can stop climate change and that we are left with rapid and radical adaptation as the only way forward.’

    Yes, that’s what the scientific evidence indicates. Arctic sea ice is at the lowest level by far for the time of year.

    https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

    as atmospheric CO2 climbs inexorably towards 420 ppm in May 2021…and then on to 430 ppm, 440 ppm, and 450 ppm some time in the early 2030s. .

    We COULD TRY not making the situation far worse faster. However, not making the situation worse faster is clearly not on the government’s agenda. The government’s agenda is clearly to make matters worse faster, both globally and locally. Which begs the question: why is Jacinda so eager to destroy her own progeny’s future? She has demonstrated to us that she is all mouth and very little brain, so perhaps that’s the reason.

    ‘This isn’t a democracy, it’s fast becoming a feudal plutocracy on a burning planet!’

    It’s never been a proper democracy. Those with money have always ensured that they or their acolytes got elected; donations to favoured candidates and parties; rigorous censorship by the corporate media, to ensure only business-as-usual candidates are elected. And whichever party has been in power, money has talked, ensuring planet-melting activities are allowed to continue, whilst ameliorating strategies, i.e. permaculture and powerdown, are immediately dumped in the rubbish bin, never to be seen again, no matter how frequently they are suggested. “Got to keep the banksters Ponzi scheme going just a little longer, whatever the cost.” And cost is increasing by the minute.

  5. The only thing that will reduce fossil fuel consumption is running out of it. Which will start to have some effect well before even empty announcements about unspecified plans for reductions to completely unrealistic levels of use being aired at the UN.
    What will replace it will overwhelmingly be nuclear energy. And that will be producing real environmentally toxic waste; not the stuff all life is made of.
    D J S

  6. There is no ” climate crisis”. Climate change is continuous and has little to do with humans. The big yellow orb in the sky is responsible. Water vapour is the most important ” greenhouse gas” by far, although the greenhouse analogy is seriously misleading. Apocalypse? Never! Have a lie down.

  7. Abysmal failure is going mainstream, as are the counter-productive policies of governments:

    “The choices we make in the year ahead will determine whether we unleash a tidal wave of climate catastrophe on generations to come,”…

    Many countries are also pouring money into high-carbon activities as they strive to recover from the coronavirus crisis, with G20 countries spending 50% more in stimulus packages on fossil fuels than low-carbon energy. “This is unacceptable,” he said. “The trillions of dollars needed for Covid recovery is money that we are borrowing from future generations. We cannot use these resources to lock in policies that burden future generations with a mountain of debt on a broken planet.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/12/world-is-in-danger-of-missing-paris-climate-target-summit-is-warned

    However, it is clear that the drastic emissions reductions required to preserve life on Earth won’t be forthcoming. It’s the economy. And the idiot economists who really don’t know what they are doing.

    And in case anyone had any doubts, the RBNZ has been buying government debt (central and local) to prop up the system.

    https://www.interest.co.nz/bonds/108333/adrian-orr-provides-reminder-rbnz-might-not-have-loosen-monetary-policy-tap-much-it-has

    Consume. Consume. Consume.

  8. I see NZ was left out of the latest climate leaders conference. Reason: they know we are full of shit, all talk, no walk.

    Shame on the woman/our PM who cried, “Climate change is my generations nuclear free moment”. All hollow weasel words!

  9. MAD MAX IS THE FUTURE

    You know , the less we do on meaningful climate mitigation (with continuing reliance on infinite growth on a finite planet ) the more credible the post capitalist neofeudalism of the MAD MAX movies seem to get .

    .Once upon a time I could watch the cinematic entertainment of the MAD MAX series as an escapist blast in a make believe Ozzy fantasy world .

    But every time I watch it now, I gravitate towards the chilling social reality of a collapsing biosphere drought world with factionalised humans groups all out to kill each other in an environment of constant of food and water insecurity .

    If we can’t do “mitigation” in 1970 -2020 then this is what “adaption ” looks like in 2100.

    Have a nice day .

  10. I predict that literally none of those Doomer things will happen by 2030. Things don’t change that quickly, especially not in climate science. If you move all of your Doom predictions to 2100, then maybe. But who knows if humans will even be around then (at least in sufficient quantities)? A nuclear exchange, or an actual deadly pandemic, or the Yellowstone super volcano, a mereorite strike, a magnet pole shift (which will leave the planet competely unpreotected from the solar radiation) etc will sort out any and all man-made climate-change quick smart.

    1. You obviously know nothing about climate science. So why bother to comment?

      Many climate-altering factors act as self-reinforcing positive feedbacks, i.e. the more of the factor, the faster the Earth overheats, leading to more of the factor, leading to faster overheating, leading to more f the factor.

      Artic sea ice: the less of that there is, the more heat is absorbed, leading to less sea ice and warmer temperatures, leading to less sea ice. And once all the sea ice is gone the incoming solar energy will no longer be converting ice into water (latent heat of phase change) but will be causing direct increases in temperature.

      Increases in temperature in the Artic region cause melting of permafrost, which causes release of both carbon dioxide and methane -which has a warming potential about 84 times that of CO2 for time scales that matter. Higher concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane cause greater local overheating, warming the permafrost more and releasing even more carbon dioxide and methane.

      Worldwide, methane is around 1900 ppb, almost three times the pre-industrial level
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_methane#:~:text=Atmospheric%20methane%20is%20the%20methane%20present%20in%20Earth%27s,20-year%20global%20warming%20potential%20of%20methane%20is%2084.

      Other positive feedback include increased absorption as ice-covered land becomes free of ice, increasing the absorption of incoming radiation; formation of clouds which trap more outgoing radiation; out-of-control forest fires, which add CO2 to the atmosphere, increasing the likelihood of drought, which increases the likelihood of fire.

      One of the biggest is population growth on the back of food produced by the industrial agriculture sector, which is responsible for deforestation of forests and jungles, and other land clearances, leading to both immediate increases of emissions from the land and increased emissions from the extra humans, who go on the use fossil fuels and produce methane-generating shit.

      The above explain why the annual rate of production of carbon dioxide has been increasing, and why the rate of increase of CO2 in the atmosphere has been increasing….about 0.7 ppm per annum when keeling began measuring in 1957 and now about 2.7 ppm per annum. And headed fro 3 ppm per annum.

      Every natural system that keep the Earth habitable is being overwhelmed by industrial humans, and their children and grandchildren are going to pay a horrendous price for their ignorance and stupidity. .
      .
      Magnetic pole shifts have occurred at regular intervals (about 100,000 years) throughout the history of the Earth with no effect on life.

      It is industrial humans that have wrecked the life-giving properties of this planet.

      1. The planet not only survived but thrived with 4,000 ppm (10x current levels). It obviously got that high somehow and it naturally went back down too to the current near record low levels (~320 ppm I gather is the minimum level required for life).

Comments are closed.