Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

24 Comments

  1. The difference between Seymour and Tamihere is that David’s version is do-able whereas John will just get a reality check from Treasury on day one.

    1. Can’t you remember the 81 tour protests? If Seymour applies all his plans those protests will look like a holiday compared to the reaction that will follow his actions.
      The biggest problem is that people think politicians can solve our problems, it is a case of holding your nose & vote hoping for the best (because most of us find that some policies stink from all parties) & being thankful that it is only 3 years till next time.

      1. the difference between protesting against apartheid in South Africa vs protesting for apartheid in NZ is…?

  2. The problem is that ACT supporters will vote. The people who need the Maaori party and its policies to pushback against neo-liberalism won’t. They are so disillusioned and disenfranchised from a system that has been taking a giant dump on them for 40 years they no longer see the point. No matter what party has been in power real change has not happened for them and the gap between the haves and have nots continues to widen.

  3. Seymour is no benevolent dictator. He’ll tear down the government for his backers to step in and run the place. He talks equal opportunity, yet hypocritically, the tyranny of capital is central to his libertarian hegemony.

    Like the town mayor in a western movie, he’ll corral his business cronies to support the ranch owner, hold the town hostage and force out all the small holders.

    Whilst Tamihere is no James Stewart, he is prepared to draw his six guns to support the downtrodden and marginalized. He just needs a sidekick to pull the towns folk to his support. Swarbrick could fill that role if she could get all the small holders aligned and firing in the same direction.

  4. Agreed, both want exactly what they say, and given half a chance, both would do it.

    When some Waitangi Tribunal academic rewrites the interpretation of the Treaty of Waitangi, again, that’s finds a new meaning no other creature on earth could possibly see, you bet TPM will seize upon that in a heartbeat too.

    The big difference between the two however is one is race based, the other is not. And I’ll vote for any secular non race oriented party any day of any week because they are simply better for ALL people over race/religion parties, even if its a party with out there right wing philosophy like ACT! Because they smell the least!

  5. What did ACT accomplish under the Key government?

    The only thing I can remember was the Auckland amalgamation which has turned out to be a complete disaster. Another was charter schools. Now they are gone its possible to get into the Papatoetoe pool during the day.

  6. What about the Winston First Party even the geriatric 80 year old is starting to say some sensible things ???

  7. Seymour want’s to deal to the lower socio-economic sectors of NZ Society.

  8. Just wondering about your 64% of beneficiaries are non Maori? Are you including pensioners as beneficiaries or is that other benes? I agree with JT, GST off food like in other countries. Some of us have banged on about it for 20 years. Its now becoming essential. Pity I cant support TPM’s other policies.

  9. I’m an old skool leftie (i.e. not Jacindanomics let alone Hipkins’ jackboot on my throat during Covid), but I will now begrudgingly be voting ACT this year simply because it is the only political party in New Zealand that is advocating a modicum of common sense.

Comments are closed.