Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

14 Comments

  1. Given the complete lack of critical thinking by journalists, are they worth saving?

  2. Any attempt to “steal” money from American companies based in America and paying tax in America would have Donald Trump putting a ring fence around new zealand and imposing the “greatest sanctions the world has seen”

  3. Require that any newspaper to receive govt support in any form must end paywalls permanently!!

    The whole point of news is that it reaches the people. It has to flow, uninterruptedly, to ensure that it is honest and clear.

    Paywalling means that essential information is being withheld from those who, in some cases, would most need to learn of it. ..particularly if they are to make informed decisions in their daily lives – and eg when they vote.

    Paywalling allows for secretly, silently poisoning the water from which we all ultimately must drink. It is noxious. It is wrong. If the govt were to help to finance it, that would be a travesty.

    1. Yes paywalls filter out necessary information and there propaganda goes unvetted.

      Hardly surprising the NZ Herald is in trouble were once able to comment and opine on pieces from Hosking and political journalists. No longer, so why can their columns go unvetted?

      1. their columns go unvetted

        And unread. In terms of needing readership to attract advertising, they’ve cut their own throats. A mass of people can no longer read their paper. So, their readership numbers have fallen. And so to less advertising.

        Following such a slow but steady suicidal approach to their biz, how can they with any integrity ask for govt support! Any such requests are their own B.S!!

        (And that’s apart from crap journalism – NOT across the board, but certainly some of them.)

  4. Two lessons from the Bauer fiasco.

    1. An end to foreign ownership of New Zealand/ Aotearoa news!
    Sure, foreign owned companies can sell their papers here. But they cannot take our generations-long papers. (Though, I guess that horse has already bolted 🙁 …But we can still guard against similar events in the future, if we act now.

    2. No single entity should own more than, eg two (2) different news outlets within AO/ NZ. End the accumulation of news ownership into one person’s hands.

  5. It never ceases to amaze me the number of hacks that profess rabid right wing sentiments, “i did it my way, pull yourself up by your bootstraps, devil take the hindmost”. They conveniently forget the roads they drive on, the power schemes built by MOW, the schools there children attend, etc. etc. A quick look at hoskings cv shows that he is far from averse to sucking on the public tit, and there are many more of his ilk.

  6. TVnz radio nz total integration across all platforms but most of the investment going online and radio tv broadcasting has become irrelevant as has the source of content so need to look more like Rt vice news and very local

  7. I get the idea of between the flags to signal where the reliable info is but isn’t there a long term danger that this creates a mechanism thats very easy for the powerful to manipulate.

    In an ideal world people would learn to use their judgement – because it is possible to work out where the reliable sources of information are – it’s just really hard for people who spent their childhood in school being taught to genuflect to authority.

  8. What’s the difference between the NZ Herald and toilet paper? Toilet paper is softer and more absorbent! Still, if there’s a shortage of the latter the NZ Herald will do as that’s all it’s good for!

  9. What’s the difference between the NZ Herald and toilet paper? Toilet paper is softer and more absorbent! Still, if there’s a shortage of the latter the NZ Herald will do as that’s all it’s good for!

Comments are closed.