Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

21 Comments

  1. “War on Crime”. I think you are wrong there Martyn. There’s a very good chance they will do f’ all. They might tinker but National always say they will do something and then quietly don’t. Please funding under their last turn being a great example. In fact they are ripping into a number things they actually started. It’s ok though all the “ grey hair yeah yeah” set will sleep soundly lapping up the Bs.

  2. If Labour had used their vast majority to do anything for the average person they would not be in a position to lose their power . I am sure 3 Waters is not the most important think in most Maori’s thought .Putting food on the table and a roof over their head is their main aim just as it is with most people and that is getting harder and harder under Labour

    1. Trevor the co governance piece is not about what “most Māori’s” think its about rectifying previous f’ ups. Just like the other co governance models, UN Charter etc. All carried out by the party you think can and will do no wrong. That party attempted to address these issues but now their new management acts like they had nothing to do with it.

    2. However much harder it gets under Labour for Maori, multiply it by 10 under Nact.

  3. Was there a mass movement in the streets that forced the government to start shifting around water ownership, away from full public ownership to the benefit of tribal corporations? Why would one suddenly appear if the status quo was restored?

  4. National and ACT will almost certanly lead to reductions in pay and conditions for New Zealand workers, not to mention the slashing of welfare and health spending, privatisation of education, and toll roads that the poor cannot afford to drive on, Also less state housing, and higher rents. It will even cost more to go to the doctor. There will also be dirtier rivers, as National will relax clean water legislation, and people will find it harder to get jobs as imigration is relaxed.

  5. The average peep is equally scared or apprehensive about another Labour government with it’s support partners also and that’s Labour’s problem.

    They look at Seymour and see a smart guy who has done the hard yards at Parliament and is not there for himself and think with a Centre/Left National support partner they will be good

  6. What mickey mouse policy will Luxon release next, maybe a pothole policy he did say we have 5400 potholes maybe he’s been out counting them when riding on his scooter.

  7. My understanding of it is that if Labour are elected to a fourth term in power, it will be only the second time in New Zealand’s history. Does that make it a slim possibility? No, it doesn’t. Polls have consistently favoured Labour over National and Chris Hipkins is arguably more popular as a potential leader in New Zealand’s next government than Christopher Luxon. Additionally, as the current Prime Minister and in his first term in that role, Chris Hipkins has the advantage over Chris Luxon.

    1. Sorry to point out the problem with your arguement Labour have been in charge for nearly 6 years or two terms it only seems to be 3 terms because it is hard to believe they could do so much harm in such a short time

  8. A National/ACT government is needed to bring some sanity back to this country. We’ve had enough of the woketards running the show.

  9. Engel, what, he i argue violence, cheep abuse profit, he, violence the end of capitalism its profit, exploit,this thing, what shall we name it.

Comments are closed.