Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

8 Comments

  1. Quoted from above:
    “Generation Zero have given her an A- grade for her environmental credentials, the highest scorer (tied with Goff – good for him, good for Auckland). Green issues are obviously hugely important for local elections. As councils are the key players in transport, urban development, parks, rubbish, recycling, and so on, a candidate’s position on these issues should be one of the biggest factors in deciding your vote.

    So Swarbrick gets a big tick on the issues of the day. But what has turned me from a comfortable Goff supporter to a passionate Swarbrick cheerleader is her mission: to increase engagement in local politics. For her, this doesn’t just mean getting existing voters to like her. It means making politics relevant to those who feel left out of the system – not just the young, but all the disenfranchised and disenchanted, as she puts it.”

    Yes, of course, Chloe is presenting a good campaign, but to be honest, apart from her rates proposal on capital land value, and strong support for public transport and so forth, she is like the others somewhat short on details.

    And Generation Zero have lost their credibility in so blindly and fully supporting the version of the Proposed Unitary Plan that the government appointed “independent” hearing panel recommended to Council, and which Councillors and the Mayor largely voted for.

    The now decided on Unitary Plan will prove to be a great instrument for developers and builders to exploit the loopholes in it. It will end in new complexes to be built that will again turn out to be poor choices, as so many rules were thrown out, and as design guidelines can be treated with generous discretion by Council’s consenting officers.

    The failure by the decision-makers to sufficiently scrutinise the details of the recommendations and to rely on “experts” who largely support vested business interests before those of the ordinary Auckland citizen, that will demand its price in future. We will add new problems to the still not fully resolved “leaky homes crisis”.

    And Chloe seems to embrace Generation Zero’s ideas without too much scrutiny also. I am sure she will have a good run and reasonably satisfactory results, but she is still just starting a political career, as I see it.

    We will be stuck with Goff and Councillors who will offer pretty much more of the same, where the interests of ordinary Aucklanders come second or will not even be considered. We will have large projects require massive investment, and that will only come with borrowing money, which we will pay for for generations to come.

    One major challenge will also be to force Aucklanders who do in their vast majority still love their cars, to move away from individual car use to switch to more public transport use. If we replace petrol fueled cars with electric ones, we will also need new power generation, as the present resources are finite and limited. Where will the extra water for nearly another million Aucklanders come, I wonder, who actually did the thorough analysis of data and conduct independent studies, I ask?

    Here is what really influences where Auckland goes, it will not so much be the Mayor and Councillors, they will be pressured to follow these ones:
    http://www.committeeforauckland.co.nz/membership/members
    http://www.committeeforauckland.co.nz/membership/membership-categories-benefits

    How will one idealistic candidate and potential representative like Chloe, or even Phil Goff, stand up against these influences and take them to task, I ask?

    Business rules, business, and local government is increasingly being dictated to by big and also medium size businesses, with their lobbying powers.

  2. I hate to tell you this but, rightly or wrongly, a middle class white girl living in Epsom, who at 22 can’t afford an apartment ‘yet’, is not about to draw in the ‘disenfranchised and disenchanted’.
    I think you may be seriously underestimating the class divide.
    That’s not to say that she could never do that, but she may need to survive a few hard knocks before some 20 year old kid in Henderson or Manukau thinks there is anyone representing their interests.

    1. Thanks for the feedback. I grew up in West Auckland myself, and the people I refer to as old friends on Facebook who are interested in and engaged by are as you describe, the 20 year old kid in Henderson included. 22 should not be too young to be thinking about saving for apartments. But her point is that it’s entirely unrealistic in this market. For what it’s worth, in the affordable housing discussion Chloe always also brings up rents, as far as I have seen.

      I like to think about Chloe’s pitch as being beyond traditional class divides myself, but yes, the proletariat uprising will need a diversity of voices 🙂

      Thanks for reading and engaging!

  3. Ps Sam My favourite word is community too.. on Waiheke we know what it really means. We also know we have to engage ‘honestly’ to win as we did for Matiatia, against very sly and wealthy people looking out for their futures not ours collectively. We know how to connect across ages, socioeconomic status, genders and ethnicities…Also helps to know when you have wolves in sheeps’ clothing or wolfcubssinlambswool in your midst..They have an aura and aroma about them often.. A just ‘too nice’ or good to be true one!

  4. Glad you mentioned the Muppets Sam? Because some people’s strings have definitely been pulled by the who is being SpunOff? ‘slick’ Miz Swarbrick. and the Youth Wing of the Property Council and Property developers’ darling Gen Zero..
    Seriously? So you are fine with her being down with Privatisation by stealth aka PPPS and CCOs? (Yep she said that, I shit you not, but then deleted it on Cathy Casey’s wall presumably realising what a faux pas admission it was to make).
    Yep the same kind of PPPs as Serco? Novopay?
    So You are fine even as an AT CONtract case is due back in the Auckland High Court shortly to continue answering bribery and Corruption charges. ( Be one of many mark my words).
    And you sound ecstatic with her having the endorsement of the floor crossing #AVoteForPHilGoffAVoteForTheTppa?
    Really?
    We actually are in trouble here when people cannot see what is being confected and conjured right in front of their faces? But then again that is how we got 8 years of John Key and non stop #PoliticalLiquefaction isn’t it?
    If you can fake sincerity ( Authenticity Credibility and Integrity) You have got it made? a banner at many TPPa events says..YEP..
    And Labour-lite Blue did for Hone and helped Key and we all know what that happened Northland in 2014 too aye?

  5. Phil Goff does not deserve to be mayor and neither does anyone who supports more privatization and TPPA. Matters not so much his experience but rather his integrity and ethics and lack of being a corporate puppet.
    Phil Goff is in the pocket of the United Nations and should be questioned about that and many other issues as well. His possible; potential future authority needs further scrutiny and questioning after his likely mayoral win.
    Look deeper at the alliances between Goff and Helen Clark and John Key and the United Nations and the WTO and support ( ? ) of NATO and corporate greed.

Comments are closed.