Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

8 Comments

  1. My only interest and concern in this matter is whether the tests ended up where they are most needed and helpful. I see little reporting on that particular point.

  2. What role did the MoH play in this? They are disagreeing with Blomfield publicly – is this revolting bureaucrats? Or not?

    Why can’t we buy better bureaucrats and good leaders in the public domain and, of course, politicians. (We get more of the coarse than otherwise.) At present I think the entry bar for all is too low. Under the system of whatever governance we have (neoliberal?) the setters of standards have brought in the idea of generic management, just learn the system and act as if you are a computer, and hey presto you can be replaced by a computer.

    Or do we have an army, a phalanx, of ‘best practice’ practitioners with their preachy approach that ignores the human touch in favour of some ‘law’ of behaviour that they have made up for themselves in some (get ready for cliche’) ivory-tower!

  3. What else are they lying about?
    The housing debacle (this last period turns out they’ve pulled down more than they’ve built!), hiding the vaccination status of those hospitalised from covid and the adverse vaccination reactions.
    There’s a mounting pile of bullshit under the carpet.

  4. I watched Jacinda answer questions about this. The spin was good, but the eyes were decidedly dodgy. The halo is slip, sliding away…

  5. It’s none of the above figureheads, it’s those at the ministry of health, fluent in bureaucratese, who are generating the spin. Which only occassionally surfaces into the public consciousness, like the tip of an iceberg that the bureaucrats are unable to conceal. Another recent example was when the ministry of health claimed in July 2021, that the mental health gumboot Friday application got turned down because it was received too late, when in reality no application had even been sent in. Just baseless spin that got found out. Why does this malbehavior carry on? Because there’s no downside, as those generating the spin, never face any consequences when found out. Another older example was the goings on at Lake Alice, and again, those at the ministry who buried the matter for years, will not be facing any jail time for being an accessory to the depravity of Dr Leeks, nor will they face any fine, or offical warning, or demotion, or even a stern talking to. That’s the simple reason why spin and covering up continues at the ministry. It makes little difference who the head guy is. And the state services commission, who are supposed to be keeping an eye on things, may as well be a little ball of belly button fluff. No genuine oversight, only genuine covering up, reputation management, and maintaining public false confidence. Why arn’t there more honest people in politics…because they don’t survive the bureaucratic merry go round, in my officially unofficial official opinion.

Comments are closed.