Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. Never ever take Stuff.co too seriously.

    They had an objective to find police racist but were pissed off when they found police don’t record race stats. So they looked at areas where searches occur and extrapolated race stats from the supposed number of people in an ethnicity living there to sort of kind of maybe reach their objective.

    What they don’t mention is why search powers were used, generally in conjunction with an attendance of an unrelated incident such as a domestic violence matter that may involve weapons, drugs or stolen property. In other words exactly the thing most of us expect police to do.

    This is a beat up by a cash strapped main stream media organisation that sold its soul decades ago

    The police are not the enemy, shit journalism is!

  2. Graphic shows clear bias against Maori in the warrantless searches.

    But also shows that although Maori and Asian have similar population numbers in NZ, Asians have a tiny percentage of warrantless searches, far less than any other demographic too. None of this pro Asian bias is reported either.

    https://interactives.stuff.co.nz/2020/12/unwarranted-police-searches-racial-bias-justice/

    Personally do not believe warrantless searches should be allowed. If the police think that someone should be searched, then get a warrant from a judge no matter what ethnicity.

    Like Tarrent with the SIS, GCSB, the warrantless searches show police fail to identify what is going to be serious offending in favour of stupid searches that do not uncover any serious wrongdoing – meanwhile probably miss out on real criminal activity under their noses by people ‘fitting in’ like Tarrent and having white collar fake jobs like currency trading or whatever Tarrent said he was doing… Tarrent was probably on the dole in NZ to boot!

    My guess is warrantless searches is more class based as well as ethnically based.

  3. There are also numerous examples of the cops stopping younger people for a supposed traffic offence and then demanding that they hand over their phones which they then search without a search warrant for evidence of other crimes, like drug dealing. On top of that, they don’t hand the phone back and the person from whom it is seized, actually most of the time snatched, has to wait ages while the cops say that it is being examined by their forensic unit which is stacked up with devices to examine.

    Just another way to harass young people who are not involved in any sort of crime. Their only fault is that they commit a minor traffic offence and then become a target – especially if their skin is brown.

  4. ” . . but this is a liberal progressive democracy . .”
    Thanks for that clarification. I thought you were saying the opposite.

Comments are closed.