Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

23 Comments

  1. As Susan Edmonds said in Stuff on 18 April
    “Just over 3000 public sector job cuts have now been announced.
    The sector grew by 2582 in the six months to December last year, and by more than 2700 in the 12 months to June 2023”. This is not a big thing.

    1. And was Susan talking about the entire public service, or just Education and Oranga Tamariki? Because the difference in context does make it a big thing, doesnt it?

      1. I accept that the government’s blunt 7% reduction assumes chief executives will cut the right roles. CEs might cut front line roles and keep diversity and inclusion or managers for example.

        1. The point i am trying to make is that if there was increase of 5000 odd jobs over 32 different ministries, the government has just axed 1000 from just 2 ministries, then there are serious problems with the scale of cuts to two essential government departments.

  2. So all these groups did so well when all these extra public servants were looking after them.
    Less quantity more quantity should be the name of the game .

  3. They porked up by the 6.5% in the last year after being told by Labour there were going to be 2.5% cuts
    Going back to those levels is sensible. There has been no visible improvement in services

    1. Public services and public spending are good. Things will not improve until the public service is restored to where it was on 31 December, 1983.

      1. The country was heading for bankruptcy about that time drastic steps were needed to get us back on track similar to the present time

Comments are closed.