Similar Posts

4 Comments

  1. Yep total failure by all, and I suspect the cover up is so JA isn’t exposed for her role on the select committee that prior to the terror attack , they chose to relax the application process for obtaining a firearms license by removing the need for arms officers to properly interview and inspect new applications.

    Thus the roll out of a firearms confiscation that as predicted would only create a huge black market for firearms, and low and behold 2020 has seen a Historic surge in gun violence.

  2. Absolutely says it how it is and it will not change unless the whole system is turned on its head. Look at that scandal with the person from the NZ Initiative writing all that shit on his own blog, how old was it, how long has he been saying this, if he doesn’t get the boot then the main stream media should stop printing the shit from them. We regularly have article in the Press from them.

  3. Perhaps some people do not understand what the Intelligence and security service apparatus is for.
    It is to protect the government and establishment, not the public.
    Back in the 1960s and 1970s the target for SIS surveillance was the Trade Union movement and Vietnam War protestors. This was not to make the public any safer but to help employers and politicians.
    In the 1980s it was people protesting against sporting links with Apartheid South Africa and Maori political activists. Again for the state, not the public.
    Do people not notice that none of these agencies, or the police, have been able to solve the killing of trade unionist Ernie Abbott? This man was killed with an expertly made explosive device( not an amateur job). This killing taking place at a time the National Government was hysterical about the Unions.
    Moving past the raids in the Ureweras and totally disproportionate raid on Kim Dotcom ( at which the police admit there were government officials not directly connected with police) to the present it is not surprising that the thrust of Intelligence Survelliance was directed at Muslims because they are the new bogeymen and women in the eyes of establishment( following the Reds under the beds, Trade unionist gangsters, long haired stirrers, Maoris who want to take all the land back, big German who annoys the United States).
    A white extremist who wants to kill people for being different to him does not threaten politicians, bankers, generals or corporates and so it cannot be expected that the Intelligence Services did anything about him.
    It was not in their brief.

Comments are closed.