Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

20 Comments

  1. what did you expect? Keep calm, take a deep breath and switch them both off. You won’t miss a thing.

    1. absolutely rosilee, bill hicks stated that for every hour of tv you watch you drop an iq point.
      it’s probably 2 points for daytime tv.

  2. Mate, public so called free to air commercial TV is dead.

    They, as in Labour/Greens in government need to turn TVNZ into an RNZ type format and let “the market” turn TV3 off permantly. It’s day is gone!

    1. 100% XRAY.

      MARTYN, – Is it not time we all together sign a petition to get the opposition parties to band together and take out a order under public right to have control over half of the “Public free to air” funded programing now so we can get the important messages out there well;l ahead of the election -Tick tock tick tock??

      Can you set none up on one of the campaign petition websites for us all, & in conjunction with our own Campaign for Better Broadcasting?

      1. Somehow I think that’s the idea – to treat the voters like mushrooms: in the dark and feeding on manure. Especially in an election year. Think back to 2014 and how prevalent the “nothing to see here” mantra was and how much real information wasn’t available to everyday people. Neither TVNZ or Mediaworks are keen to much of the looking under rocks that true investigative journalism requires, afraid as they are to offend their paymasters.

  3. I guess we have to give it chance but it doesnt come anywhere near the wit and intelligence that went with Paul Henry.Really what is with the silly little confetti type objects that float around the screen when guests are being interviewed,looked very cheap and tacky.

  4. I guess we have to give it chance but it doesnt come anywhere near the wit and intelligence that went with Paul Henry.Really what is with the silly little confetti type objects that float around the screen when guests are being interviewed,looked very cheap and tacky.

  5. Does ‘The am show’ stand for the ‘alt media’ show, or what?

    I watched it for the first time this morning, and I agree, it was anything else but the usual news cereal morsels for the morning, with endless commercial advertising, silly chattery, foolish, over-rated media characters trying to look professional.

    Indeed, mince pie rather than steak and cheese, when compared with the Paul Henry Show, which I also did not think all that much of.

    But ‘breakfast’ on TV1 is not much better.

    Don’t bother with this crap, if you want real news and better info, while also getting more boring and shallow, at least RNZ still presents the best morning news program with Morning Report.

  6. Quote:

    “Duncan should have launched into Bill English by accusing him of wilfully expanding the property bubble for political reasons. Instead a slightly bemused Bill English fended Duncan off like he was some horny puppy trying to hump his leg first thing in the morning.

    Andrew Little responded to Duncan’s enthusiasm for asking louder and louder questions that have no depth by just smacking him on the nose, “I know this is your first show, calm down Duncan’.”

    Yes, not very good, was it?!

    But with Garner, do never expect much real grilling, but “show grilling”, he avoids the truly hard political questions, compared to him Guyon Espiner does do a much better job on RNZ, despite of mostly being rather tactful.

    Garner comes across as having a bet both ways, most the times.

    1. Yep, I’m at a complete loss as to why media companies feel Dunc is worth chucking on the telly. He was *possibly* fine as a political reporter, but all of last year’s Story efforts proved night after night that he isn’t articulate or fluent without the pre-scripted autocue. At least at 0600 he’s completely avoidable – 1900 less so.
      Maybe one day +hr=E will wake up to themselves and move on from the Henry/Dunc/Gower crushdom.

  7. Who truly watches this junk.
    Who truly wants to watch tv at breakfast time.
    Television in NZ is mostly appalling

  8. Yeah both are crap and should be done away with.
    We have to much bloody news programs on tv so get rid of some.

  9. Audience for TVNZ Breakfast? – my guess is oldies who are going senile and at home parents who have had 1.5 hours of sleep that nite. Have you not noticed the poise and hearing aid adds?

    It’s the advertising that often give more idea of expected audience than the content.

    TV is actually just made for advertisers not viewers, that’s why we get infomercial breakfast TV, property porn sponsored by banks and placemakers and nothing educational or vocational that might help people improve themselves.

    I don’t watch breakfast TV, but if I did the pic you showed of the panel would put me off straight away.

    In fact since I got Netflicks, I have not watched any TV.

    TV is on the way out. Even my elderly Mother has Netflicks.

  10. I reckon most mainly watch* those breakfast TV ‘news’ shows so think they’ve got other people, live people, there in house with them. They like the company.

    Me? I’ve got dogs to fill the role. The irony is that those watching the crap also have TV programmes which are dogs .

    *watch = have it on

  11. this is the ‘news’ as entertainment brain child key had, where you get a formula news, lite new – fake news programming from some authorative sounding source – then a happy local thing, dont worry if its all to much cause theres always sports at the end of the day, this is a variation of 1984. I dont think this will work with out keys pervy hand at the helm, has english been up keys ass long enough to have understood how to minipulate citizens? thats the question

Comments are closed.