Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

10 Comments

  1. Thank you Martyn Bradbury for exposing this for what it is ,utter BS.
    Bit of a mine field out there in Woky Doky land at the moment for those of of a certain gender, certain race and certain age!

  2. How was he allowed to be Speaker again and continue to suck on the public tit after such a terrible abuse of his power does he have any mana left to call out others for not following the rules of the house .He was a bully as a Minister and it seems he has not changed .

  3. Woke is the new disguise for kiwi blokes going through their mid-life crisis and wanting to be ‘down with the kuds’.
    That’s 2 down (I L-G and Mallard). Strewth – how many more to go?
    Easier to just clutch and koochie-coo a baby of two or offer to do the housework. Take it from me …. it works a treat

    1. If what you say is correct how on earth do Smith and Brownlee remain employed, remember the Bronwyn Pullar affair?

  4. Was there not some other male member of Parliament who kept pulling a woman’s hair even after she asked him to stop it? ( I can’t remember the bloke’s name but I believe he held an important cabinet position).
    I read that there were police officers present when he did it( personal bodyguard). I mean the police must recognise an assault when they see it – surely?
    I am sure he was severely punished for it – I mean they would not let someone get away with something like that just because he was a senior politician. The speaker of the house would not ignore someone important and just pick on a parliamentary staffer as an easy target.
    This different standard could lead to things like a visiting foreign politician have his bodyguards rough up a member of the New Zealand Parliament actually inside the house – and then have the Prime minister and the Leader of ACT apologise to offence given to the visiting tyrant.
    It could never happen here could it?

    1. Yes the leader of ACT was noticeably absent with his attack on the Speaker on that occasion. His political attack on Mallard was nothing more than attention seeking similar to his twerking on Television. Seymour you are the ultimate hypocrite!

      1. If she does not fire Mallard your Jacinda could take the hypocrisy card.
        The most honest and open government and let’s be kind to one another are 2 of her pronounced aims.
        I am sure the $330000 could have feed a lot of children

        1. Trevor, Trevor Trevor, how the fuck does she sack him? Seriously. He is independent of the P.M. He is elected by the House. Collins, Seymour and all leaders are equally responsible.
          How did Key continue in his role with his assault of the waitress? He gave her a bottle of his wine for fuck’s sake!!!
          How did Smith continue to be an M.P. after the Bronwyn Pullar affair.
          What Mallard did was a gross overreaction and his name will be forever tarnished. Key goes on to make a fantastic income, worshiped by the masses. A waitress’s entire career was destroyed, their reputation mangled.

        2. Maybe some of National MP Hamish Walker’s salary that he took him from mid July through to the election could also feed a lot of children or maybe even build more roads Trevor.

Comments are closed.