Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

18 Comments

  1. I have been wondering if this happened to Chris for months. I can’t believe the censorship he has been contributing to could have come naturally.
    D J S

    1. If so, how does he not know whether or not he is unwittingly delivering a message to intimidate?

  2. They say Russia is bad at propaganda, but maybe they’ve been deliberately faking it & have been very effective in right wing circles

    1. This man does have such a way with words! I’ll be looking forward to that first novel, too.

  3. Cool. So we can’t believe bloody anything. Where does that leave us? Stewing in our own prejudices?

  4. Mark Twain commented that a person who did not read the papers was uninformed, that somebody who did read the papers was misinformed. Who prints sets the agenda, and now with social media here we all are doing it.

  5. When you get called a conspiracy theorist you have to ask what has the alternate opinion got to hide. Example, the “vaccine” was produced in record time and released without full clinical trials. Nobody as far as I could ascertain had produced a working safe vaccine for decades despite research. When I questioned the safety the official line was “it is safe”. Anybody who continued to question the safety became labelled an “antivaxer” and “conspiracy theorist”. Merely because they asked is it safe and wanted empirical evidence that was never forthcoming. That’s double disappointing because I got vaxed.

    I dont believe in UFOs, or the Twin towers conspiracies, or Chem trails etc simply because when I ask for evidence it is always flaky. So was the Covid information from government and pharmaceuticals. It didnt pass the “not talking shit test”. Who needs conspiracy theories when the avoidance of straight answers is so blatant.

  6. The problem with agreeing to use symbols in your work (presumably at the behest of intelligence agencies) is that, while they may tell you it is to communicate something to someone, it might actually be to intimidate an innocent person. By agreeing to play along, you might find yourself part of a prosecution action under Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly or other legislation.

    Should a writer for the Dailyblog be asked to do such a thing, they ought to serious interrogate what they are doing.

Comments are closed.