Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

10 Comments

  1. Yes Taika is right and one of the most racist groups was state employees many of them were pakeha as mostly pakeha got those jobs back then.
    When we had the State housing corporation all the Maori and PI got put in the bronxs areas and now the gnats knocked down these dumps we were expected to live in and have created half million plus housing development for example Petones Jackson Street, Pomare to name a few. The gnats sold a lot of state land to private developers just before the last election to build up there bullshit surplus. Also I get sick and tired of hearing our pakeha NZders saying we all had the same opportunities when that is not true. Cause who got the best jobs? who employed them? who got the best State houses and ended up buying them under the gnats when they first started hocking them of and who were able to get loans from the banks not the Maori people back them.
    This is why the Maori affairs corporation had to provide housing options for our Maori people and their whanau because they were being discriminated against and couldn’t get homes to live in.
    And this type of bull carried on for many years so who benefitted the most from the welfare state?
    We (Maori) also have to put up with racism from some foreigners
    that come here.
    This country was founded on racism when you colonise you assimilate.

  2. The British class system is a virus which many pakeha carry with them, it can lie dormant for some decades but is often reactivated by affluence at which point it also becomes racist. There is no cure.

  3. I don’t mean to be a pedant and I do agree with the point you’re post is making, however, it is Ku Klux Klan not Klu.

  4. Usually when the topic of racism hits the news it is a distraction for something else …crumbling health service maybe, perhaps war crimes…?

    1. The Give Nothing To Racism campaign is a Human Rights Commission advertising campaign that was signed off on by John Key.

      Like a Pepsi commercial it is an acceptable form of protest.

      I don’t deny anyone’s experiences, but it is acceptable to neoliberal markets to discuss gender and race unendingly as if they were the only human rights issues we face because it gives people the feeling that we are fighting for equality without having to make any sacrifices or redistribute any of our wealth.

    1. When that inequality takes the form of members of one race consistently doing worse than another on a wide range of statistical measures, you are pushing shit uphill to claim that race has nothing to do with it. It would be nice to think that any measures aimed at reducing inequality would fix the problem, but there have been many such measures over the last 100 years, and they clearly haven’t fixed the problem for Māori (amongst others).

    2. While individual whites may be against racism, they still benefit from the distribution of resources controlled by their group. Yes, an individual person of color can sit at the tables of power, but the overwhelming majority of decision-makers will be white. Yes, white people can have problems and face barriers, but systematic racism won’t be one of them. This distinction—between individual prejudice and a system of unequal institutionalized racial power—is fundamental. One cannot understand how racism functions in N.Z. today if one ignores group power relations.

      1. There is an assumption there that people act in the favour of their racial group. They don’t, often, at least in the West. Controversial opinion: the West was never really about race, and assimilation has been possible at it high points for thousands of years. The bible, on the other hand, likes to label people by race.

Comments are closed.