The weird case of Lisa Lewis and the ACT Party – this tyranny will not stand!
Say it isn’t so ACT?
I thought the ACT Party was all about free choice, freedom of speech and a slavish devotion to Adam Smith’s invisible hand.
Which is why it’s so puzzling that ACT have denied Lisa Lewis membership to the Party.
No one says entrepreneurship quite like Lisa and her championing of free speech by doing the news naked surely makes her candidate worthy rather than mere membership.
Apparently not.
Lisa has framed the rejection email and is currently selling it on Trade Me.
Why isn’t a free speaking feminist like Lisa Lewis allowed to be a member of a Party that endlessly proclaims its free thinking brand?
David Seymour must face questions on why ACT hates female entrepreneurs so much.
This tyranny will not stand!
TDB will be tireless in demanding Lisa becomes a member of ACT.
Since when was ACT too good for Lisa Lewis? We’ve all seen David twerk!
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media
Lisa probably doesn’t meet the prerequisite of being a covid denier, conspiracy theorist, gun nut or hater of the poor and disadvantaged. She also probably ticked the box that said she had compassion for her fellow human beings (big mistake). Laugh of the week for me was Seymour claiming that NZers shouldn’t label other people, after finishing a hard few years of labelling people he disagrees with (and it’s a long list).
So the “standard bearers” for free speech will only let you join if you are “the right stuff”? Why am I getting the impression that the “right” of the political divide are entering a new era of oppression based politics? “Free speech”? Only if it fits in with what they want.. Nothing new here, except for a whole new level of suppression politics, and self deception on a societal scale..
I had thought humanity would have learnt something from the first round of ignorance and stupidity (middle ages), but no, we still have a way to go down into the “basement of ignorance”…
Considering the political vacuum that the ACT party represents, then the scope for widespread corruption is huge with these opportunists.. So much so that the Nats support base will be eying act up to see what more they can get out of supporting them than the nats were able to steal…
ACT is still essentially a socially conservative party.
Lisa Lewis is a sexually liberated woman.
I am not much of a sports follower.
But if there were more Lisa Lewis’s at the cricket and rugby, I would stretch myself and watch it more often
It appears Martyn has taken up the feminist bulletin and Liz is on weather for now.
Possibly might have something to do with her being a sex worker, so you can say whatever you want in ACT, but don’t believe for one minute, you can do what ever you want legally to pay the bills.
If being the champion of oneself and chasing media attention whenever it presents means you can’t be in Act I guess Seymour’s time is up.
Rude, a man telling us women Lisa Lewis is a free speaking feminist. Little do you realise she simply blocks many women who dare lay down an opinion on social media , yet tolerates her ‘pussy’ worshippers who regularly make misogynistic comments.
More to the point, she’s nothing more than a high profile pornster, whose fanny resembles a pre pubescent teenager, & who once preyed on a poor truck driver, who stumped up 8 grand for her breasts to poke out.
To say she is a feminist icon is actually a slur on the movement.