Similar Posts

6 Comments

  1. It is worth considering the conditions in which social media is being censored. The 2018 documentary ‘The Cleaners’ follows Facebook moderators in the Philippines, who work ten-hour shifts for pitifully low pay checking posts flagged for violent or explicit content. They do not receive any trading or support for coping with the frequently disturbing material they censor: as you can imagine, many develop severe mental health problems. Furthermore, they are sacked for the slightest mistake, meaning that most regulators will err on the side of caution as far as ‘nudity’ is concerned. Most ominously, the paranoid atmosphere created by Duterte’s government has created an intense paranoia around anything that could be deemed controversial. It is this context that the photographs were deleted: exploited workers, frequently traumatised, caught between a neoliberal social media factory and a toxic political climate.

    1. The main reason social media can not be supported is that there are tweets and posts about 5G conspiracy, sexual deviance, or something after shooting by the kind of low IQ individual that is being carried away by American media corporations as if people disappear on bouncy castles and other left-right extremists.

      But all this can be mild and factual based on studies and empirical claims and doesn’t have to be that much of an opinion. I don’t think the social media world was that supportive of Black Lives Matters and there can be research papers for or against. So it is a strategic mistake to pander to these marginal groups. Raising the minimum wage to a living one fixes this and you won’t even have to engage with them.

  2. This is difficult. I am not used to thinking of Seymour as one of the saner MPs. (So, a long pause before commenting.)

    However, in stark contrast to Ms Collins’ hysterical cries of “Catastrophe!” reverberating through the parliament, Seymour sounds remarkably, even radically “sane”. (It’s just the contrast, I’m telling myself.)

    If I were a Nat trapped in the theatrics of their new regime, I’d be sizing up the safe-ish exit that ACT now represents.

    And his ref. to Taiwan, Yes. Their way is one that seems to be working. (Lots of masks and temp checks..)

  3. David Seymour and Act certainly have their appeal .. I’ve been tempted to vote for them .. honestly there is still a chance I’d vote form them. I know my sister is, may the baby Jesus help her.

    .. I won’t vote for a party polling less than 2% so TOP is out. Really is a political wasteland. I want cannabis reform – so I guess the Greens?

    It mean, obviously I care about a great many issues .. but I know cannabis reform is something they mighty ACTUALLY be able to get done!

    If Act said they would make passing the cannabis-law-reform a condition of any coalition agreement, on pain of having a second election – I’d vote for them. But Act doesn’t have the stones, so they are nothing.

Comments are closed.