Similar Posts

23 Comments

  1. To implement all those plans requires what is missing from the list.

    Social cohesion. No sign of that happening anytime soon, if ever.

    That 50/50 split in the upper house is not democratic. Why Pakeha and Maori only? No other ethnic group need apply?

    Better split in parliament would be a lower house made up from list MP’s and an upper house made up from electorate elected. MP. No to five year terms, absolutely not. If one cant get consensus, with other parties, in three years to implement policies, extending this out to five years wont make a blind bit of difference.

    Upper and lower house elections to be staggered. So an election every eighteen months to keep the politburo in check.

    No point in having local empowerment of the people if the central soviet can ride roughshod over the local wishes. Look at the nationalisation of Watercare in Auckland. Did the locals get a say? No. telling them they will still “own” the infrastructure but not the benefits derided from the ownership is a Claytons ownership. Not worth a cent.

    Wealth taxation will be interesting. Will Maori, churches, etc. be included?

    1. You miss represent what the 50\50 upper house split represents. The principal of that is kind of like when parliament was in acting laws to confescate Maori land they had no representation to stop that. So if there’s a 50/50 split Maori get the chance to say hang on this legislation is bullshit and it builds on the principles of The Treaty.

      Why is this important because what Pakeha is not will to do, Maori is willing to do it.

  2. The truth is that NZ can do stuff all to change what is happening as it’s driven from India, China and the US.

    We should drop the useless and frankly embarrassing ’best in show’ mindset, accept that we are just a little second world nation in the middle of nowhere and start focusing on mitigation and damage prevention.

    Nothing we do to reduce emissions or the like will make any difference whatsoever other than make us all poorer and for what? So those Green voters luxuriating in their Grey Lynn and Herne Bay mansions can feel virtuous whilst they take Tarquin and Arabella to Farro’s in their Tesla to buy organic artichokes. All the while the rest of us go under financially as the unnecessary taxes the likes of Auckland council want to impose hit the poorest hardest.

    1. Fortress Aotearoa isn’t preventive. It’s prescriptive.

      Martyn Bomber Bradbury knew that the disinformation campaign against climate change worked so well that it was mathematically impossible to stop climate change atleast 5 years ago. How do I know well because I was one of the first to bring it all up (there were others all arguing and Bomber put it all into coherent words for us)

      So Bomber knew climate change want going to be prevented so he published a prescriptive set of policy reform designed to adapt to complex and evolving social, economic and environmental models and evolve for the purposes of making the proceeding generations comfortable and have a better deal than the previous ones.

      Basically I don’t really care how the World ends because under Fortress Aotearoa you could choose things like a supernova, dwarf star or what ever.

        1. sigh. yet another word salade that’s starting to mean nothing: “it’s not. Lear to me.”

          How old are you 12yrs old?

          The only thing that’s not clear is your Gronk mind.

          We need to create a word for the process of losing all meaning via contact with internet politics.

  3. Agree with most of what you say. Sad that we have been betrayed by the leaders and MP’s of the Green Party in particular – who are more interested in pursuing the woke elite agenda of identity politics as the number one issue, rather than protecting planet earth for all.

  4. Some items on your list make sense some not so but if they all came to fruition would it make any difference to climate change as China and India open new coal powered power stations weekly and the population of these 2 giants move towards a perceived better standard of living

  5. “Pretending that we can ‘stop’ the climate crisis cascade is sophistry, …”

    Absolutely God damned right!

    But that doesn’t stop the bike lobby for example wanting to pour our money into their hobby’s by using climate change as the reason, now does it?

    1. It’s more likely that rail is sunk below ground because land prices is likely to be way way way to expensive and tunneling don’t cost government except for construction costs so construction costs are relitive to land prices so just tunnel.

      Free public transport opens up roads and bike and walkways should be raised to prevent the risk of death and injury in super high density urban environments.

  6. Martyn has a very optimistic view of the other nations around this Earth. Does anybody really think that the 2 superpowers (USA, China) & even our Australian mates(?) will stand by & watch while their countries burn & we have our little fortress Aotearoa? While I obviously disagree with the hundreds of thousands of years I agree with him that this earth’s future is finite in its present state.

    1. No we’re not, all this doom and gloom underestimates the inventiveness of mankind and our ridiculous ability to adapt and survive.

      It’s only water – look at Holland!

  7. Best thing I’ve ever seen you write.
    Fortress Aotearoa won’t save from abrupt climate change. Sorry.

    1. Fortress Aotearoa isn’t meant to save us from the storm of abrupt climate change its supposed to be a multi thousand year life boat we can ride it out in.

Comments are closed.