Similar Posts

8 Comments

  1. I daresay it suits Nash to say that he believes public servants rather than environmental experts with no vested interests. A fellow who publishes pictures of himself wearing a singlet ? Spare me.

    I expect they’ll be getting rid of mine inspectors next because of mine owners’ assurances that they operate safely. Why not abolish Worksafe from peeking at the logging industry when they say they’re safe too ?

    If Nash won’t act, then we have to. To repeat from TDB:

    ‘The Talley Brothers are the embodiment of the old saying that “Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men for the nastiest of motives will somehow work for the benefit of all”

    As well as boycotting McDonald’s fish burgers etc, here is a broader list to boycott.

    Talley’s products to Boycott

    McDonald’s

    Fish burgers and other fish products

    Talley’s

    Icecream (Crème de la Crème, Crème de la Crème Guilt free)

    Peas, beans, corn, spinach, carrots, mixed vegetables

    Mussels, Talleys retail bags, Ocean Royale retail bags, Oyster Bay, Scallops, Squid bait, Hoki portions AND By Products: Fish Meal, Fish Oil, Fish Fertiliser

    Open Country

    Milk Powders, Milk Proteins, Milk Fats and Cheese

    AFFCO

    Lamb, beef, veal, mutton, goat, leather, hides, pelts, calf skins, protein meals, tallow, casings, slipe wool, pharmaceutical blood serums.’

  2. It is undoubtedly an ongoing disgrace, one that the previous government maintained an obsequious silence over. Sadly, with Shane Jones and now Stuart Nash running interference, perhaps we all should just accept that Fisheries NZ will ultimately destroy our fisheries, assist some species to move towards extinction, and lead the way in showing how to run a fully extractive, unsustainable operation.
    Time for some more feelgood fisheries adverts?

  3. The word is that MPI officials are fearful of the Talleys brothers, who are litigious and with the wealth to back it up. No wonder MPI is so “accomodating” of the fishing industry.

    1. If there’s one thing you can say about Stuart Nash it is that he is very accommodating.

  4. I guess that litigious is one way of describing Talley’s. Back in 2002 a Motueka woman brought a case against Talley’s for gender discrimination because they wouldn’t employ her filleting fish.said it was men’s work.

    Incredibly, one of the Talley boys said that women were better suited to be pole dancers – or maybe beauticians. Not nurse or teachers or typists, but pole dancers for heaven’s sake – that seems to be the level of a Talley mind, and enough for me, as a woman to boycott them.

    Interestingly the South Island’s Skeggs Fisheries did employ women filleting fish. Late 1990’s I attended Skeggs Fish Filleters’ Christmas Dinner at The Pines in Wellington. The ladies were pleasant and sociable, and it did not occur to me to wonder why they weren’t out pole dancing.

    The 2002 Talley mouthpiece said that men couldn’t be pole dancers, but I reckon there’s a few politicians with nothing to get in the way of them being pole dancers.

  5. The idea that some commentators seem to have had that Nashy is benignly funny and in some way okay?? tell that to the grand-kids who’ll grow up never eating fish and chips…

Comments are closed.