Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

43 Comments

  1. Why would we want Key involved he chose to leave didn’t he say he wanted to spend more time with Bronagh and moonbeam their cat. And Key left a mess for someone else to clean up. If Luxon is just more of the same John Key type we have already been there and done that. What about someone new, fresh and not tarnished is there anyone in the National party that can fit that brief?

    1. Outside of Reti, the saddest part is that National still have those morally corrupt experienced MPs influencing their young up and comers, Nicola Willis being the example, a whinging, entitled politician learning all the Collins traits along the way.

      1. Sorry Bert but Reti us tarnished by his loyality to Collins (just like Mike Pence). If you dance with the devil you will get burnt.

      1. Wild Katipo “ Is Gerry Brownlee still there ?” Where exactly ? I mean he could have gone thru’ the wrong door again – he could be anywhere – but not to worry, he’ll turn up again in due course. Somewhere.

    1. It is a curious fact that Rob Muldoons National was , in fact, to the left of the modern day Greens, … and had more in common with MANA than any other party on the political scene. This tells us of just how bogus is the modern NZ political scene and commentators when they speak of ‘left ‘ or ‘right’.

      The overarching difference being that of difference between Keynesianism and neo liberalism / Lazze faire. Now, there were many multi millionaires in NZ during the Keynesian economy. So one cannot say it was not for free enterprise. Nor can one say that it did not have the wealthiest per capita results when one see’s the results of 1969,- the 6th wealthiest only behind Denmark.

      Yet now we see the results of neo liberalism post 1984. Massive poverty, food banks not coping, homelessness, people locked out of home ownership, poverty wages, increasing domestic violence, degraded infrastructure. Why support it?

      Because in supporting ACT, you support all of the above.

      Poor choice.

      1. Yes WK, pipsqueak seymour might be entertaining but his policies are truly awful. We are not fooled by his rhetoric.

  2. Luxton just looks like ‘Todd Muller-lite’ to me. And his TraitorKey connection is a double edged sword.

    1. Boldger? You mean Bolger? – What about Ruth ‘Mother of all budgets/ Employment Contracts Act 1991’ baby, huh? Seems your being a little selective there matey ! Didn’t she have something to say as well?

  3. Not keen on corporate bal’heads myself. What do those guys with the shaved heads and tightly tailored suits do when they all get in a room-rub bonces in weird rituals of some sort…?

  4. A major problem I see with Luxon is that he does not want the job, yet. To be a good leader you must want the job – this is different from being in love with the power being a leader bestows. At the moment it would appear Luxon is being pushed forward and used by Key so Key can regain power through puppetry.

    1. Of course luxon wants the job! He’s just lying. Trying to be coy. And if he’s lying ALREADY what’s he going to be like later..?

Comments are closed.