Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. THIS NEWS JUST IN! Nicky Hager on Radio New Zealand
    ‘A former long-term Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS) officer is running private intelligence operations for the controversial private investigation company Thompson and Clark. This includes the tracking and monitoring of ex-members of the Exclusive Brethren as reported by Radio New Zealand yesterday.’
    Once a sneaky bastard always a sneaky bastard.
    Actually Nicky Hager reveals that he could uncover this because Gerry and his mates are also careless bastards and therefore shit intelligence gatherers ( forgot to use codewords for names).

    1. Stevie: “‘A former long-term Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS) officer is running private intelligence operations for the controversial private investigation company Thompson and Clark. This includes the tracking and monitoring of ex-members of the Exclusive Brethren…”

      For the life of me, I can’t see what this has to do with anything. Both are private organisations: what business is it of anyone else what they do?

  2. “I read the terrorist’s manifesto….”

    As did I, thanks to you, Martyn, for having posted the link. For a person of limited education, he was surprisingly articulate and well-informed.

    “…I don’t recall him referring to Trans Allies or gender identity, so why criminalising the misuse of pronouns is being mooted as a response to white supremacy terrorism is utterly beyond me!”

    I remember his manifesto as being an anti-Muslim rant about the great replacement. It had remarkable similarities to jihadist stuff I’ve read, except that they fear Christians. I don’t recall anything about white supremacy: indeed, it’d be odd, given that he attacked Muslims, who are members of a religion, not of an ethnicity, and who are as likely as not to be white.

    “….identity politic based intersectionist roulette virtue signals….”

    I agree with you: I don’t understand how this stuff has anything to do with the hate speech issue. It doesn’t crop up in Tarrant’s manifesto.

    “…the entire Intelligence apparatus of NZ didn’t bother doing their job…”

    I read the Royal Commission report. It states that Tarrant couldn’t have been caught, except by chance, because he was a loner who flew under the radar. Beyond a few individuals, NZ doesn’t have a white supremacist sector; Tarrant apparently didn’t contact even those few individuals.

    On the other hand, we must give due recognition to the police who caught him: a couple of country cops in the city for some training, or some such, I believe. And they nabbed him before he could kill any more people. Which he almost certainly would have done. Many of us saw that arrest, captured by a passerby on a mobile phone.

    The report noted that intelligence services were focused almost exclusively on jihadism and Islamism. Given that there have been no instances of white supremacist mass shootings in my considerable lifetime, I expect no less. On the other hand, Islamist violence is an ever-present threat, and it would be optimistic to claim that we in NZ are immune to it. Attacks in Europe are frequent: just the 2019-20 Christmas season, there was one in Vienna, where we have extended family. It was a very worrying time, to be sure.

    I expect our security still to be paying attention to this sort of ideology, because it’s clearly a bigger threat here than white supremacy.

    1. No, I disagree with your conclusion.

      The intelligence apparatus is paid $200m each year to predict the next danger.

      They failed to spot Tarrent because they were too focused on Maori, Muslims, Greenpeace, MANA and Hagar.

      The SIS admitted they picked up Tarrant downloading Anders Breiviks manifesto IF they had cross referenced that with local intel – like the fact there were 3 complaints from his gun club – he would have been caught before he committed his atrocity.

      You are as bad as the woke in letting the intelligence apparatus off the hook.

  3. 3 years in prison for thought crimes…

    ‘the incitement of disharmony, based on an intent to stir up, maintain or normalise hatred, through threatening, abusive or insulting communications’.

    …bewilderingly the NZ Left see no danger with this…….

    what’s bewildering is how the author can defend “free speech” so passionately here yet during the election mounted a sustained smear campaign against Billy TK jnr. & the tens of thousands of NZ citizens who supported his right to question, shrieking for them to be silenced amongst a number of other punitive measures ….

Comments are closed.