Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

15 Comments

  1. wHILE WE HAVE POVERTY NOTHING WILL CHANGE .Everyone is saying we need to spend 5 billion per year on defence yet we are cutting spending on our next generation .There would be no need for OT if we eliminated poverty on so many levels .How can we justify anyone living on the street ,or shit being dished up to kids for lunch .Then there is the elephant in the room WHY ARE WORKING PEOPLE having to go to the government for support because their wage does not cover the cost of basic housing and food .While we keep shitting on working people from above we will always have poverty ,gangs and OT destroying the lives of the next generation .

    1. This is because we have a government full of privileged amateurs who have never had to deal with difficult circumstances in their lives OR they are zealous survivors of the system, such as Ms. Chhour, who thinks everyone is the same and if she can ‘pull herself up by her boot-straps’, then so can everyone else.

      If poverty could be dealt with many problems would melt away but they prefer punishment. They love to see people squirm.
      Jacinda may have over-managed and caused childish resent among many groups but at least she wasn’t falling into the trap of thinking everyone is the same and has the same personal skills with which to deal with their lives adequately.

      We have a govt. of people think they have the skills to govern, who do not.
      Act is full zealots who think everyone who isn’t like them, should aspire to be.
      Here’s a thought, Act. Most of us don’t want to be like you. We don’t admire your ‘achievements’.
      We know you have an agenda that is not for our benefit. You are not aiming to govern properly.
      You are simply setting up a system of punishment and devaluation.
      That’s the dangerous bit.

  2. Agreed Gordon Walker.
    Here’s a conversation I had a few years ago I had with my ACT supporting employer.
    Boss: ‘ subsidies are a waste of money. Anything that that cannot support itself deserves to fail.’
    Me: ‘ But taxpayers subsidise you!’
    Boss: @#!!! how?’
    Me; ‘The wages you pay are so low that I need family support to bring my wages up to a level where my wife and I can feed and house our two children so the fact is the government is using taxpayers money to top up my income. If you paid a decent wage I would not need that taxpayers money.’
    Boss: ‘ But if your wages are higher this business fails and you will be out of a job.’
    Me: ‘ Do You own a holiday home at Papamoa Beach?’
    Boss: ‘ Well yes. but..”
    Me: and the big game fishing launch in the Bay of Islands?’
    Boss is silent.
    Me; ” and did you have a seven week holiday last year? Fiji, Gold Coast, Indonesia?’
    Me, ‘ What percentage of your income do you pay in tax?
    Boss: “Mind your own fucking business – time you stopped talking and got back to work.’

    1. I had similar conversations with my boss when he was making 20 people redundant one year .I pointed out that he was in fact making his customer redundant who would then not be able to afford to buy his product .His reply was but these people dont buy the packaging we make we sell to other manufactures who package the stuff they make into our packaging .I then asked who buys the end packaged product ,the 20 people who you have just made redundant .He then said no they wont because they can no longer afford the price .

      1. Few if any business people lay people off for fun as it usually means there is a cash flow problem or they have lost a contract. Too many businesses wait and then it is too late and the whole business gers closed down .
        How many businesses have you started and employed workers as you seem to think you have the knowledge.

    2. If the pay is so bad why are you still there. Have you tried to improve your skill set to be in demand .His effort has given you a job .
      If your boss is like most small business owners he has taken a risk and sometimes that risk pays off but other time the business fails and he will lose everything. How many hours does he put in each week .For most it will be early starts and late finishes.

  3. I had a number of so called step parents. Dinner time was especially antagonistic. Everything was an ambush. Why were you five minutes late. Where is you school jersey. You won’t be any good. Think. There is no replacement for a biological mother and a father.

    1. I was in care for a short time when I was 5 or 6 .What a fucken bitch that lady was .As soon as I was dropped off it was off to your room and wait for dinner .After dinner ,bath and back in your room till breakfast .After breakfast get to school .After school straight to your room and the cycle was the same every day .No playing with the other kids in the street or stuff like that .Thank fully I was rescued by and auntie and uncle and went with my sister to live with them for some time till we could return home .

      I can see why we have disturbed young people ,I was one of the lucky few .

  4. Read that too. Sir Ian Taylor may not agree with me about everything, but he got this right.

    Mr. Amateur Hour, jack-of-all-trades, Master-of-None, Seymour poking his nose into everything but can’t manage to complete one thing properly.
    If Luxon had any ability to lead he’d demand Seymour gets school lunches sorted out to our satisfaction before he gets any more charter school money. Too bad for those already clipping that ticket.

  5. I thought we knew that women had big hearts and would care for vulnerable children as well as they could. Only some seem to have caught the bug that finds no way to deal with ‘bad children except by punishment. They used to use high electric shocks, what is the favoured measure now? And where have all the women gone who are the children of those who started The League of Mothers and the National Council of Women??

    League of Mothers and Homemakers of New Zealand
    | NZ History
    https://nzhistory.govt.nz › women-together › league-mot…
    1 Jan 1996 — The League of Mothers [and Homemakers 1926] was a non-denominational Christian organisation which aimed to reach ‘young mothers and all lonely women who are in need …[disbanded in 1996]

    National Council of Women of New Zealand
    Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › National_Council_of_…
    The National Council of Women of New Zealand was established in 1896, three years after women in New Zealand won the right to the vote, as an umbrella .

    Thanks for putting it in print Bridget Williams.
    The National Council of Women
    Bridget Williams Books
    https://www.bwb.co.nz › books › the-national-council-…
    The National Council of Women has since worked for equal access to education, for prison reform, for protection of women from alcohol-related violence, for …

    But what now do they overlook or wash their hands of, Herod-style?

Comments are closed.