Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

23 Comments

  1. Would do better as a BLUE GREEN party.
    More policy wins under National f t Greens. Got to break away from the dependency on Labour

    make Chloe leader and she will create a massive stir by not ruling out National.

    1. National refuse to support legisation that would stop farmers and businesses from polluting our rivers.

    2. Greens should be supporting party based on most policy gains. But they themselves can’t agree on their own priorities, and instead latch on to Labour to take them in some rudderless direction, based on preexisting prejudices. Some day a real green party will be born, and the fake one will disappear.

  2. So you’re trying to convince people that a third term might finally bring “transformational change” when the first two terms didn’t.

    Good luck in selling that, no one is buying it.

  3. Greens should be supporting party based on most policy gains. But they themselves can’t agree on their own priorities, and instead latch on to Labour to take them in some rudderless direction, based on preexisting prejudices. Some day a real green party will be born, and the fake one will disappear.

  4. Chloe as Leader is a 15% Party. Imagine Jacinda as Prime Minister with Chloe as Deputy.

    A truly dynamic duo! A divinely feminine inspired leadership. Throw in an Aries, a Capricorn and a Taurus to actually get stuff done and New Zealand and all of our people will rise from the ashes. It’s totally doable. What sun signs are Ardern and Swarbrick? We really should analyze our politicians astrology to put together a fully functioning and effective government. JMO 🙂

  5. As I said before, National oppose clean air and water regulations, preferring to let people just put what they like our rivers.

    No same Green party should be signing up to water quality deregulation.

Comments are closed.