Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

20 Comments

  1. I thought the article was surprisingly good until getting to the end when I realised your NZ utopia included apartheid.

    1. Well, your first post after a TDB OP. Wow, what an opportunity for you to rack up the “Likes”. I must be witty in my response for this one and explain in a single phrase how much your reasoning sucks, kiddo.

      Oh, wait, I’m already beyond one phrase in this reply, so no memetic wit for me here. Hmm… maybe a post-modern reaction where I go fully meta (not fully retard, that’s for Yourself)? Yeah, I’ll do that. Or will I?

    2. Pakeha dominated social democracy led to the Maori protest movement. It was a racist system. It was also sexist.

      If you think 1950’s mono-culturalism is the answer, then go vote for NZ First. The rest of us have actual solutions.

      Apartheid is a gutter insult and it shows you have no argument.

  2. Totally agree. It’s like we need the best people from Labour, Greens and Mana to get together in a true Left party, a real opposition.
    “Greens are linked with concern for the environment which for struggling families appears as a secondary concern to holding body and soul together. ” Quite: Good, but not enough.
    I struggle to understand how Mana got involved with such as Mr Com. (Hardly a ‘dot’ on the economic landscape!) The money, at any cost?

    The Left needs a new brand. It needs to re-phrase its original ideology if it is not to be thought of as pushing ‘tired old ideas’ onto a modern world.
    Neolib thinking has become part of the natural mindset of modern society…how can we, as opposition, highlight the inevitable negative results of neo-liberalism without constantly ‘being negative’?

  3. “Within Labour there is a battle going on between some more progressive members and a small but powerful group of MPs linked to the 1980s who stifle any moves to shift the party away from neo-liberalism.”

    Progressive members? Are you sure? I don’t see much of a difference between those who were around in 84 and those who are newer. They all sing from the same song sheet, but I’d like to be proved wrong.

  4. ” If we get things right for EVERYONE then we also – we get things right for Maori ”

    Call me a weirdo but anarchy seems pretty appealing.
    Absence of government – absence of an unfair two party monopoly which many see as part of ( if not all of ) the problem.
    Absence of corporations owning and dictating to most worldwide governments and lobbyists writing most laws.

    Definition of Anarchy – a state of disorder due to the absence of nonrecognition
    of authority – absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual – without chief ruler.

    Many think of mayhem and uncontrolled chaos when the word anarchy comes up. Maybe there is a different and more open minded way of looking at an alternative to the govt. worldwide structures that have caused much pain and greed and suffering and perpetual wars for profits.
    Maybe most govt.s are not worthy of supporting now in the structures they operate in presently.
    Most in Iraq and elsewhere in the middle east see the U.S. as the enemy now so maybe our military domination
    and trying to spread – so called – democracy has been a failure and should stop.

    Why does the absence of government have to mean disorder and mayhem ? Maybe it doesn’t if we work together to avoid it. Maybe it does not have to mean a fear based ( and greedy based ) conscientiousness and maybe we can find a way based on absolute personal freedom and cooperation and sovereignty and equality and well – being for all.
    Why does the absence of the very thing that causes so much chaos and corporate greed and environmental catastrophes be a bad thing ?
    Just some food for thought and a few questions to ponder.

    http://www.dennisfox.net/papers/4reasons.html

    http://cavern.uark.edu/~dksander/anarchy.html

    http://proliberty.com/observer/20060301.html

    http://www.seesharppress.com/anarchismwhatis.html

  5. Parliament has always been the servant of the comfortable and elite. Always. Even under Oliver Cromwell.

    It was never meant to serve Everyman.

    Think how long the full adult male franchise was denied. How there were conditions aplenty put on ‘the right to vote’.

    And think how useless that ‘right’ actually is. How difficult it can be to access an MP, or implement the will of the people.

    Ponder on the increasing unaffordability of getting justice and redress.

    Think about Belgium of recent times: when the parliament couldn’t settle and the country trundled on WITHOUT a parliament for blessed MONTHS. No civil war between the Flemings and the Walloons. Just like the summer break here.

    Of all the ‘laws’ made in this country by over-paid non-representatives – probably a tenth are used/enforced.

    And the idea of stitching together the best of the best parliamentarians to actually be law makers, revisers and exterminators of obsolete laws – instead of factional servers – yes! (They could keep their present pay, and actually benignly work for it.)

  6. Good think piece John.What are the Labour Party’s core values anyway?
    It’s years since I’ve read or heard of them

Comments are closed.