Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. Martyn is spot on about Luxon ,,,,,, who just like his NAct predecessor, John Key,,,, has myths built about his past, his actions, and his motivations,,, all pushed by a dirty media which gaslights us instead of objectively informing….

    They have to do this myth making and dis-informing, for what motivates the NActs and Luxon benefits the few (who they either work for, or are part of as in Luon & Key’s instances), and done at the expense and detriment of the many/majority.

    An example of this is the ‘deodorant company’ Unilever, where Luxon was one of the branch/country managers …. https://michaelwest.com.au/unilever-a-multinational-tax-dodger-classic/ ,,,.

    When hugely profitable international corporations dodge and skip paying taxes ,,, then the average and poor people in the countries where the corporations extract their un-taxed or unde-rtaxed profits have to pay more taxes and receive less in Govt services, or less money spent building, upgrading and maintaining infrastructure,,,, or both

    “Runaway corporate and monopoly power is an inequality-generating machine: through squeezing workers, dodging tax, privatizing the state, and spurring climate breakdown, corporations are funneling endless wealth to their ultra-rich owners. But they’re also funneling power, undermining our democracies and our rights. No corporation or individual should have this much power over our economies and our lives —to be clear, nobody should have a billion dollars”.

    Luxon has the christian values of the spanish inquisition ,,,, He works for the few ( greedy rich pricks ) ,,,, because his god, which is actually money, tells him to.

  2. And just like that the F# Evidence- Action Man assured of his prowess pops up again today to be a dick and wave a stick !

    On just day ONE of the cellphone ban in schools, Spin it – ERICA announces her empirical evidence that the ban works.

    ” She said schools would have different ways to enforce it and was confident the ban was working, claiming she’d received reports from librarians that more students were taking out books.”

    The CoC’s surveillance system, Librarians contacting Erica directly ????

    And in jumps tough on crime Action man -Luxie who misuses an agency to threaten, an ERO Audit as punishment ?

    Onto another laugh with Luxie … one school’s policy …

    1st time…
    2nd time..

    “Third time caught with cell phone
    The phone will be taken to the office as per the first and second time. (NB. The offenders personal file will also have their offences recorded each time.)

    The ( Offender) student will then collect their phone at the end of the day and will be required to complete a reflection session on the Friday after school that week.
    Reflection meme here…lol

    This “will involve the student ( Offender ) reflecting on the harm that has been done by their continual defiance of the cell phone rule.”

    They will also have to write an apology letter to someone affected by their actions.

    Dear Nobody
    Between classes on my lunch break…. with the school breaching Privacy and Property Acts , I was apprehended while ….

    And the fourth time because teachers have nothing better to do we’ll hold a whanau conference (for the Offender).

    Now here’s a fine mess from Community Laws files
    ” My school has a policy that says students and their property can be searched at any time by school staff – is this legal?

    No. Teachers and authorised staff can only search you if they follow the laws in the Education and Training Act. See “Can my teacher make me hand over something that belongs to me, like my phone?”

    You can’t be asked to give your consent to something that’s outside those powers (like a strip search).

    However, if you freely volunteer to empty your bag (for example, because you’re keen to prove you’re innocent), then that’s fine.

    The school might say that by being enrolled at the school, you and your parents or guardians have agreed to this policy. This is incorrect because schools can’t adopt policies that go against New Zealand law. ”

    ” Your bag can only be searched if a teacher reasonably believes it contains a harmful item.”

    IE: An item is considered “harmful” if it is an immediate threat to anyone’s safety.”

    Now chew on that one Democracy Project!

Comments are closed.