Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

6 Comments

  1. The sort of person who says in 2020 she opposed civil unions in 2003 because she preferred equality for same sex couples rather than an alternative to marriage. The fact is in 2005 she voted for legislation making marriage for a man and a woman only.

    1. Paradoxically Collins has liberal views on other women’s issues. She also voted against legalising prostitution – as rape that’s paid for, if she’s lucky. But as Christine says, nothing can compensate for a policy that denies climate change. All she stands for is underpinned by taking care of big business/capitalism at the expense of the rest of us. Good blog, thank you Christine

  2. “But with the infrastructure policies announced yesterday that focus on huge toll-funded motorway projects and threaten SkyPath, and plans to suspend SuperFund contributions, it’s a regressive and reckless package. These policies and a potential National government will inevitably take us backwards. The Crusher is a conservative so it’s no wonder. And as Franklin D Roosevelt said, “…a conservative is a (wo)man with two perfectly good legs, who …has never learned to walk forwards at all’.”
    Where is Judith Collins Climate Change Policy here????
    We don’t see it when she announced the transport package; We claim that ‘Building more roads using public taxes, only subsidies private road freight and not any rail freight’ Rail Freight is the only way to lower our climate change transport emissions, as the MBIE latest statistics are now saying road transport climate change emissions are increasing not decreasing.

    A vote for National is a vote to increase ‘climate change disastrous weather events’.

    1. Do you seriously think that the actions of any NZ political party have any impact on the increase/decrease of “climate change disastrous weather events”? I’m not sure weather is made on such a micro level…..

  3. What are they doing about job security?

    No minimum redundancy payments in our law which encourages NZ firms to lay off workers willy, nilly, as it costs them nothing. They then hire them back again which destroys worker income, security and moral. Long term, the firm and industry itself is destroyed, as it becomes a less and less trusted brand that quality workers do not want to work for.

    Other countries like Australia have protections in place for people who lose their job – four weeks redundancy pay for the first year and two weeks for each year of service after that. But in New Zealand we have nothing… zilch.

    That leaves the third of working people who live paycheque to paycheque with real problems.

    Sign this if you want our law changed in NZ.

    https://www.together.org.nz/4wks4fair?utm_campaign=4weeks4fair_1&utm_medium=email&utm_source=together

  4. Never liked Roosevelt tbh, -in my book he was a political hedger.

    He hedged until he saw who would win between Nazi Germany and England while seeing England take the brunt during the Battle of Britain and watching it burn, , – and then he hedged again as he sniffed the political /economic winds of change sweeping Europe with Prof John Maynard Keynes Cambridge University’s brilliant economic recovery plans , – and then had the audacity to dismiss it as ‘too simplistic’.

    One year later he adopted it and the same result: six months later the USA was out of the red and into the black. The New Deal owes NOTHING to FDR and EVERYTHING to John Maynard Keynes.

    So lets just get that straight.

    ——————————-

    Apart from that?… good article and many salient points. And thanking you for it.

Comments are closed.