Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

31 Comments

  1. “Our brittle weakness is collectively beneath the challenge of our times”

    While Van Morrison – like a Clapton and one or two others have turned out to be prima dona pratts, he asks some good questions:

    Why are you on Facebook?
    Why do you need second-hand friends?
    Why do you really care who’s trending?
    Or is there something you’re defending?
    Get a life, is it that empty and sad?
    Or are you after something you can’t have?
    You kiss the girls and run away
    Now you won’t come out to play

    Did you miss your 15 minutes of fame?
    Or do you not have any shame?
    Or is it some kind of twisted game?
    Put yourself in the frame
    For what some people work very hard to attain
    Or are you looking for a scapegoat to blame?
    ‘Cause you’re a failure again

  2. Fair points Martyn. The USA is a bellweather of social trends. As I see it:

    > Both have performative governments that pretend to care about the poor and minority groups, but simply don’t. By every measure life has gotten worse for the poor and working class under their rule.

    > Both have released dangerous criminals into their communities instead of locking them up. The resultant crime wave and social destabilization is largely visited upon the poor communities they came from. Meanwhile in both countries, life the leafy suburbs carries on unaffected. There are no drive by shootings in Martha’s Vinyard, the Hamptons, Herne Bay or Seatoun.

    > The main route of escape from poverty has historically been through education, but both governments have allowed their state education systems to rot and fail. Oh, everyone gets a certificate, but they’re not worth shit.

    > Both governments are running highly corrosive racial narratives. Not one individual in either nation has ever owned a slave or stolen native land. Neither have their fathers or grandfathers (unless they’re immigrants from North Africa or the Middle East LOL).

    > In the USA, Latinos are now moving to the Republican Party in large numbers. Who can blame them! That is an interesting trend that may also be mirrored here in due course…

    1. By every measure?

      Incomes (MW up, more workers receiving wage increases, base benefits higher, more after tax income if working part-time). With the income power supplements energy is more affordable. The standard of private rentals is higher and more live in either new state housing or recently renovated state housing.

    2. Are Latinos moving to the GOP in large numbers?

      New York Times/Siena College polling.

      Democrats lead among Hispanic voters 56 percent to 32 percent – 24 points. Biden beat Trump by only 20 points in this group.

      That said before 2020 Democrats would lead by 40 points. And thus the GOP is holding Florida and is secure in Texas despite influx of Democrat voters from the West Coast.

      1. The issue is Latinos are concentrated in larger American cities where as the cities that areost important are in the region’s. Still not getting the distribution correct.

    1. God help us all.

      Steve Bannon and The National Party are writing Winston’s speeches. …and Winston will be wanting Foreign Minister in a National, ACT and DUMB (Destiny and the 4 Umbrellas of the Freedumb Right-Wing, Apocalypse)

      Expect to see 20% GST 20% Personal Income Tax and 20% Business Tax. Kiwisaver contribution back to 1%.

      Did i miss anything?

      1. Peters has two party coalition policy. It would be either a Nat/NZF coalition supported by ACT or a Lab/NZF one supported by Greens. This time more likely the first.

        1. Well John key increased Gst from 12.5% to 15% to pay for his tax cuts and spun the bullshit it will be tax neutral so expect the same from luxon/willis after all the 1% don’t want to pay tax they avoid it anyway they can through bullshit trusts and the likes ..

  3. 1000 people out of 300 million or so? I think you would have found 400 people thinking there will be a civil war in the US 25 years ago.

    I think I am generally a pessimist but some of these stories just seem to be designed to stoke fear to an unreasonable degree.

    Not a Seymour fan but I am glad he has pointed out several times how reasonable debate is getting harder because of sensationalism, GST on super fees being a classic example.

  4. The people are rumbling. Some of this is manipulated, i.e, wokeness and identity palarva, but most of this, most of the discontent of the people is due to policy failure. It all starts and ends here, the rest is rubbish.

    We need government that serves the people. We need government that says no to war. We need government that addresses the greatest indicator of policy failure there is – rising economic inequality. We need this type of government. The people are rumbling because they know that we don’t have this type of government. Government for the people folks – this is what elections should be about.

    1. Agree re: Govt for the people. Unfortunately our system no longer aligns with this. Time to throw it out and forge a new path.

      1. I prefer solid ground, meaning fixing what we have via waking the masses up to the people unfriendly actions of both government and media. Enough ‘awake’ people, rising up, can challenge the hold that money has over both politics and the media. We can work things out from there.

        As for forging a new path, I don’t know what that means. Perhaps a visionary of some sort will come along and enlighten me. Why knows! But for now, solid ground, concentrating on what I do know is where I am at, bearing in mind that I grew up in good times, the 60’s/70’s so I believe that government can serve us well as long as we the people hold them to account. Right now though, we are in servitude to them rather than the other way around.

  5. Precisely. Now a mainstream party is accepting the American practice of ‘hazing’ in addition to misogynistic bullying, as appropriate behaviour for its MPs.

  6. We are seeing the end, but its a controlled demolition of the West, in my view, in order to ‘build back better’ or usher in a new, ruling class friendly, social/economic system known as, Agenda 2030, I believe…Jacinda referenced it earlier in the year. Dunno what its about but if it is not a system or way of life, that we the people had any say in creating or agreeing to, then I am pretty damn sure that it ain’t going to be good for us.

  7. Totally agree, pessimistic as it is. Cyclic – “Without a vision, the people perish” – No more shared understanding and collective vision. A better world for me rather than A better world for all.

Comments are closed.