Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

45 Comments

    1. bert – and their best isn’t all that great either, when their best is inevitably exposed by Nicky Hager et al.
      Sad.

  1. Identity politics sees the left CIA controlled… socialism is universalism. Socialism without universalism is aimed at suppressing socialism.

  2. There is talk of Dr Lance O Sullivan standing for the Maori Party which would be a game changer . Labour have done little to help Maori despite the support they got at the last election. Most of the comments I have heard indicate many Maori leaders see the harm marajuana has done so will not vote for a party in favour of liberalization. Hopefully Bridges rules out working with NZF as Key did and Act get more support and be the friend the right need to win

    1. The only reason ACT are there is because they are a defacto of National. In all our years of political history, this is the most corrupt electorate.
      No, the Maori vote will stay with Labour as Labour have done more for Maori than National ever will.

      1. Plus 100 Bert, prisoners have told me they are better off under the coalition some will say who cares about them, well I do cause most of them are our people.

        1. Nats policy for their next term is to increase prison numbers (reduced under this present govt). The discussion of that policy was paywalled on the damned Herald (cursing them for doing that).

          And they are big on privatising prisons, running them for profit.

    2. I think Lance should stick to what he does best, being a doctor and the Maori party crapped on our people they will find it hard to be resurrected. Marijuana is not the main cause of our peoples harm its colonisation and some of the poison that comes with it.

  3. The number 1 sentiment of the next election will be fear.
    A war with Iran is certain, the US has stockpiles of munitions that need to be utilised before they are dumped. The outcome will be 10 times more devastating than Dubya’s invasion of Iraq.
    Fonterra will be under the control of foreign banks and the “backbone” of the country under severe threat.
    The likelihood of a collapse in global property prices is high, and even though we may escape unscathed as we will be seen as a bolthole, the threat of a collapse here is enough to see increased fear amongst investors.
    The housing crisis will become much worse and educated people with former well paying jobs will be forced on to the streets.
    Climate change devastation will result in insurance bills doubling and many properties becoming uninsurable.
    These are just the certainties, there will be many more events that results in growing mental health issues and a climate of fear in NZ.
    This all weighs up very nicely into National’s hands. Increased surveillance by the SIS and GCSB, more arms for the police, more crime, more social disorder.
    So the only way the Coalition can retain the benches is to formulate a plan to counter this fear and provide a plan that strengthens the minds of kiwis.
    Good luck to them.

  4. The big issues of the election will be the ones that are not addressed.
    Rising inequality.
    Cost of living.
    Mass immigration.
    1080.
    The last two will kick the stuffing out of NZF and Green votes respectively.

  5. Democracy for the RMA in action in NZ… want to stop social harm in the community – you will be the ones paying for it under our RMA rules.

    Hawke’s Bay community leaders ‘won’t pay a cent’ of court-ordered costs for fighting liquor licence
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/118639203/hawkes-bay-community-leaders-wont-pay-a-cent-of-courtordered-costs-for-fighting-liquor-licence

    “It’s not a level playing field. We see the damage alcohol does in our community on a daily basis but we and our community don’t have the sort of funds needed to fight this fight in a fair manner. It’s simply not right. I will fight it to the death,” he said.”

    Surprise, surprise, more liquor outlets, more crime

    “Off-licence density is significantly positively associated with violent offences, sexual offences, drug and alcohol offences, property abuses, antisocial behaviour, dishonesty offences, traffic offences and motor vehicle accidents, and significantly negatively associated with family violence.

    “The density of clubs and bars is significantly positively associated with violent offences, family violence, drug and alcohol offences, property damage, property abuses and antisocial behaviour.”

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10853010

    In addition Liquor stores across the country have emerged as significant offenders of migrant underpaying and/or visa fraud aka pretending to pay people more than they get, to ensure the applicant gets visa points when they actually don’t qualify.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/113567345/liquor-stores-across-new-zealand-running-on-the-labour-of-exploited-migrants

    Just another example of NZ rules propping up socially harmful outcomes across the board around NZ, while anybody who questions anything is fined by the legal system that supports the offenders of crime and profiteering rather than protects the community from profiteering, socially harmful, business.

  6. The relentless march of globalism and destruction of local community around the world, in particular poor and small countries are disadvantaged.

    Uber will sue Colombia FTA international lawsuit: Uber will sue Colombia for violating the FTA with the United States

    https://en24.news/2020/01/uber-will-sue-colombia-fta-international-lawsuit-uber-will-sue-colombia-for-violating-the-fta-with-the-united-states-present.html?fbclid=IwAR39_e57AuhUZ8BAe0cX3zpebSrPjvgdI-mGEVd9rX6KMzZNH0GdilV37xw

    Bully boy tactics under the ‘free’ trade agreements…. business entitlement gone berserk, and governments apparently can’t even decide what goes on in their own countries anymore without some new law suit on their tail…

    Uubeber is a great idea, but I also think that governments should NOT be intimidated into making their laws and operations to cater to other countries global (low wage, gig economy, tax advantages) businesses either!

    “Uber’s main British business paid only £411,000 in tax last year while the commission fees from thousands of drivers in the UK disappeared into a controversial tax structure in the Netherlands.”
    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/oct/10/ubers-main-uk-business-paid-only-411000-in-tax-last-year

    Uber booked $20 billion in rides in 2016, but it’s still losing billions
    https://www.businessinsider.com.au/uber-2016-financial-numbers-revenue-losses-2017-4?r=US&IR=T

    (So I guess Uber that relies on government paid roads to operate, low wage, ‘non employee’ workers and so forth is not contributing much of it’s 20 billion in turnover into taxes to pay for the infrastructure it operates on…)

    So surely it should be ok to say, no thanks, uber into expanding into poor countries… but nope….

    At least the Labour government seems to be trying to tax turnover rather than profits because there don’t seem to be profits or taxes with more and more multinational companies…

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/382800/national-worried-a-nz-tax-on-facebook-uber-google-could-lead-to-retaliation

    Taxpayers and ratepayers are expected to put in billions for roading infrastructure…. while the companies benefiting like Uber/trucks/etc pay a tiny amount (especially with hybrid cars that don’t consume as much petrol which is good but obviously these companies should pay their share for the roads going forward and proper wages and conditions for their drivers not have them all on benefit top ups….) Meanwhile with the rise in Uber more cars on the roads…. less taxes for public transport and ACC…

Comments are closed.