Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. Wealthy people back winners so why would anyone back the last Labour government.
    Labour has been forward thinking in the past especially Clarke in her first 2 terms but the last lot were poorly lead and no policy to grow.

  2. When you are stuck with a party & its supporters who believe that they are the better economic managers despite the evidence showing the opposite then they obviously do not have the intelligence to encourage real productive industries. This is why they stick with property as it is all they can understand although like all bubbles eventually it will pop. That is no consultation to first-home buyers forced into crushing debt or renters stuck in a cycle of poverty with high rents reducing the amount they can save with the added pain coming from both major parties seemingly unable to solve the problem. Labour did make good first steps but it was too little too late.

  3. All this blood money didn’t really get them elected but it ensured that Mr. 8% and Mr. 6% came in on the coat tails to wreak havoc on democracy. Will these big donors be happy with this awful coalition or will they vote with their dollars somewhere else next time. They can’t be happy with our weak PM, he has no portfolios. does no real work visits schools and kindergartens on his days off ( which are many) however his downright laziness is not called out by the so called journalists they only call out the likes of JA and green MP’s and mayors . This weak pm makes no important decisions and is very afraid of Winston Peters and that’s why Shane Jones won’t get sacked neither will little Simeon for misleading parliament because he is a little man not one of the little women.

  4. Apparently National’s Penk is going to Australia to try and source cheaper house building materials..

    He might source the odd product but it will barely shift the dial on the cost of a house.

    Land is overvalued by a factor of 5.

    Realestate agents rort every sale.

  5. Land investment.
    The tax-free real rate of return on NZ land holdings is about 3.5% per annum over a 10 year property cycle.

    Election investment.
    $10.4 million down for a $2.9 billion return. That’s a 27,700% rate of return over a one-year period.

  6. The fact that a not very bright man was apparently Key’s protégé says it all really. Neither of them have contributed to this country in a constructive or productive way nor have the skills or talent to do so. Bonnie rightly notes that this lot don’t encourage real productive industries, and as long they and their mates benefit from the status quo the social and economic well-being of the whole community is unlikely to benefit, and the brain drain will worsen, which is probably what they want.

Comments are closed.