19.5 C
Auckland
Sunday, December 21, 2025

Contribute

Home Blog

National gerrymander special votes to steal 2026 election by abusing process

There are so many abuses of power this Government has committed over December and late November by ramming through controversial laws it is difficult to pick a worst one, but I believe this hard right Government gerrymandering the special votes so as to steal the 2026 election is the most dangerous…

Electoral Amendment Bill passes its third reading in Parliament

The government’s changes to the electoral system have passed their third reading in Parliament.

The Electoral Amendment Bill ends same-day voter enrolment, bans prisoners from voting, allows for larger anonymous political donations, and clarifies the ban on giving out food at voting places.

People must also enrol at least 13 days before the election.

The legislation has been found inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act and the changes to enrolments could prevent 100,000 or more people from voting.

The government says the bill will improve the timeliness, efficiency and integrity of elections.

The opposition says it aims to suppress voting.

…when a Government abuses due process to ram through controversial laws that gerrymander the special votes – which traditionally have always favoured the Left, we are in very dangerous space for a Democracy.

WE SHOULD BE MAKING IT EASIRE TO VOTE! NOT RESTRICTING IT!

So let me see if I can get this completely straight.

The Government is gerrymandering the rules on Special Votes, which always lean left, by disenfranchising the 200 000 voters who vote in the last 12 days, by disenfranchising the over 5000 prisoners from voting altogether and by raising the amount of money the rich can secretly donate to their rich prick mates by $1000 up to $6000?

This Government has become so desperate to hold onto power they are re-writing the rules for themselves by disenfranchising pro people WHILE enabling their rich mates to secretly donate.

If you are not incandescent with rage, you are not paying attention!

This Government can’t win a straight election, so they will cheat to win instead!

All of this has been done while you are distracted and not paying attention.

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

National allow rich foreigners to buy $5m mansions – will Luxon benefit?

With so much controversial legislation rammed through Parliament by abusing Urgency, new laws allowing rich prick foreign property speculators to buy $5million dollar mansions has been rammed through with barely any scrutiny…

What changes to New Zealand’s foreign buyers real estate ban will mean

Explainer – In a flurry of last-minute activity before the holidays, Parliament has approved changes to the foreign buyers ban that has been in place for the last seven years.

The changes will allow “golden visa” investors to purchase a home in New Zealand – but there’s a catch. They’ve got to spend at least $5 million on buying or building a home, as well as committing to other contributions to the economy.

…The last time this Government changed bright-line rules on property, the Prime Minister sold two of his properties, made $500 000 untaxed and obscenely escaped $70 000 worth of tax from a law he changed!

The Prime Minister has two properties that are both worth $7million each.

Look me in the eyes and tell me the Prime Minister won’t abuse the rule changes again and sell one of those houses off to a foreign multimillionaire?

LOOK ME IN THE EYES AND TELL ME A NZ PM WILL NOT CHANGE A LAW AND PERSONALLY PROFIT FROM THAT LAW CHANGE?

Tell me our Prime Minister is not that venal.

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

ZB Dads gain power to bash Maori youth with new vigilante laws rammed through by abusing urgency

Abusing urgency in December, the Government have rammed through with barely any scrutiny, controversial new legislation, one of those is the insane new Vigilante powers…

‘Complete anarchy’: Concerns raised over new citizen’s arrest bill

Shopkeepers could soon be allowed to restrain children if they catch them stealing under a new bill introduced to Parliament this month.

The Crimes Amendment Bill would allow citizens to forcibly arrest anyone committing an offence under the Crimes Act by boosting citizen’s arrest powers.

While some support the bill, others have already raised concerns over its potential impacts.

The wider citizen’s arrest powers would not just apply to people stealing from shops, but to all offences under the Crimes Act.

That meant citizens could soon be able to forcibly detain and arrest a person for committing bigamy or an employer carrying out wage theft.

…the only person who should be able to touch you and force you physically comply is a Police Officer, allowing the wider citizenry to take matters into their own hands is a recipe for disaster.

Paul ‘Mad Max’ Goldsmith’s vigilante powers are a recipe for social carnage, and note it’s not socialists and commies like me saying it, it’s your won police force you silly sleepy hobbits…

‘Counterintuitive’: Police slam Govt citizen’s arrest proposal as giving public more power than cops

Police have panned Government proposals to enhance citizens’ arrest powers as a backwards leap from the status quo, while also giving the public more freedom to arrest than cops.

This is revealed in police feedback on the proposals, released to the Herald under the Official Information Act, which outline a plethora of concerns.

Among them is the risk of low-level offending escalating into violence, and a lack of clarity on what counts as reasonable force, which police said could open the door to excessive vigilante justice for “taking a chocolate bar or genuinely forgetting to pay”.

“The public or retailers may take action they believe to be lawful that could result in either their action being legally challenged, or in the escalation of violence leading to physical harm to the public or the suspect – or both,” police said in feedback to the Justice Ministry in December.

…it’s the question everyone has been asking since Paul ‘Mad Max’ Goldsmith’s Vigilante Nation – GET YOUR BASH ON (trademark pending) was announced, can ZB Dads, Redneck Crackers and Culture War Boomers get to bash Māori kids…

Should children be protected from citizen’s arrest? Child welfare watchdog asks for evidence behind Govt proposals

  • The Government wants to broaden citizen’s arrest powers so they apply to any Crimes Act offence at any time of day, and clarify “reasonable” force as including bodily harm in certain circumstances.
  • They currently only apply to offences of a certain severity, with different thresholds during working hours.
  • There is no specific protection for children or young people, which the Chief Children’s Commissioner says neglects their right to be free from all violence.

…everyone wants to know!

ZB Dads, Redneck Crackers and Culture War Boomers are salivating at the chance to beat up Māori kids suspected of shoplifting. They are the exact pumped up toxic masculinity males who will become judge, jury and executioner in scenarios like this.

Good social policy stops fellow citizens physically confronting one another.

Bad social policy enables citizens to physically confront one another.

Why does the Supermarket Duopoly have so much power? They already price gouge us and have mass surveillance face recognition powers, why are their profit margins suddenly sacrosanct enough to enable staff AND bystanders to physically attack suspected thieves?

ZB Dads, Redneck Crackers and Culture War Boomers will all believe at the outset of the physical confrontation that they can physically manage the situation, (because men always tend to overestimate their abilities) and they are going to suddenly be confronted by a very desperate person with little to lose.

This is going to be a recipe for fucking disaster.

Either the ZB Dad, Redneck Cracker or Culture War Boomer will get seriously injured by the desperate person they physically attack or they will hurt the Māori kid.

Either outcome will see an enormous explosion of anger from either side.

That this has been rammed through under urgency so you the citizens aren’t aware is a disgrace.

 

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

Climate denial Government abuses process to lower methane levels for Corporate Farmers

As the planet burns and while everyone’s attention is on celebrating an exhausted Christmas with many whanau missing from around the table this year, the Government abused urgency to ram through lowered methane targets for their Corporate Farmer mates…

Parliament debates climate targets under urgency

Farmers will be exposed to the uncertainty of the three-year political cycle by the government’s decision to walk away from the bipartisan consensus on climate change, the Greens say.

The government is pushing through all three stages of a bill to weaken the 2050 methane emissions target under urgency in Parliament on Friday.

If passed, a required 24 to 47 percent reduction in methane from 2017 levels will be halved, to a 14 to 24 percent reduction.

…Once again this anti-environment Government strangles the common goof for their Corporate Farmer mates!

This Government is in total denial about climate change and it’s impact on our environment…

New Zealand oceans warming 34% faster than global average, putting homes and industry at risk, report finds

New Zealand’s oceans are warming 34% faster than the global average, with NZ$180bn (US$104bn) worth of housing at risk of flooding, a new report about the nation’s marine environment has revealed.

The ministry of the environment and Stats NZ’s three-yearly update, Our Environment 2025, collates statistics, data and research across five domains – air, atmosphere and climate, freshwater, land, and marine – to paint a picture of the state of New Zealand’s marine environment.

The latest in the series, Our Marine Environment 2025, painted a sobering picture for the country’s oceans and coasts – one defined by warming and rising seas, intensifying marine heatwaves and ocean acidification, brought about by global heating.

…look at what is happening in Antartica…

Scientists discovered something alarming seeping out from beneath the ocean around Antarctica

Planet-heating methane is escaping from cracks in the Antarctic seabed as the region warms, with new seeps being discovered at an “astonishing rate,” scientists have found, raising fears that future global warming predictions may have been underestimated.

Huge amounts of methane lie in reservoirs that have formed over millennia beneath the seafloor around the world. This invisible, climate-polluting gas can escape into the water through fissures in the sea floor, often revealing itself with a stream of bubbles weaving their way up to the ocean surface.

Relatively little is known about these underwater seeps, how they work, how many there are, and how much methane reaches the atmosphere versus how much is eaten by methane-munching microbes living beneath the ocean.

But scientists are keen to better understand them, as this super-polluting gas traps around 80 times more heat than carbon dioxide in its first 20 years in the atmosphere.

…and what’s this Government’s response? Let their Corporate Farmer mates pollute without consequence!

Labour foolishly (enabled by James Shaw) tried to cut deals with Farmers and Farmers turned and shat in our face!

Dark money from the agricultural industry soaks into the astro-turf Taxpayer’s Union stable of clients and enables Groundswell to stop any environmental improvements.

National disgracefully appointed a Dairy Industry Stooge as the Chief Scientist while bring back the 100% Pure greenwash tourism campaign!

Just consider the manner in which Corporate Dairy have seized control of NZ’s political right

The Climate Change Commission recommends methane cuts of 35-47%. However, under pressure from lobby groups like Federated Farmers – whose ex-President Andrew Hoggard is now an ACT Party MP – the Government established a separate panel to review the methane target in line with this controversial tool. That panel landed on a much weaker methane target.

…this total policy capture by polluter interests is the reason we are being attacked on the global stage by International Climate Scientists…

Scientists accuse New Zealand and Ireland of trying to cover up livestock emissions

Leading climate scientists have accused politicians in New Zealand and Ireland of using an “accounting trick” to back their sheep and cattle industries, warning their support for methane-emitting livestock could undermine global efforts to fight climate change. In an open letter shared with the Financial Times, 26 climate scientists from around the world warned that New Zealand’s proposed new methane targets risk setting a dangerous precedent. 

…that’s right!

The Corporate Dairy industry has spent millions donating to National and putting dark money into Right Wing astroturf organisations to shut down any meaningful climate emissions targets that the rest of the world has noticed the policy corruption and are now calling us out.

We are being attacked internationally for being a climate criminal all because National refuse to stand up to their Corporate Dairy interests.

The Carbon Capture ‘technology’ that National have banked all our emission offsets on doesn’t work…

Carbon capture: Pivotal project for cutting greenhouse gas emissions looks shaky

A critical part of the government’s plan for cutting greenhouse gas emissions over the next five years appears to have fallen over.

…and in the last budget National cut 50% to climate finance, barely any cuts to emissions, all while slashing foreign aid for our Pacific brothers and sisters by cutting climate aid by $100m.

This Government is a Climate Denial Government who are refusing to do anything about the coming adaptation because they are paid by the polluters.

A cow shits the same as 14 humans, we have 10 million cows, that’s the equivalent of 140million humans pissing and shitting into our rivers!

We must brutally take the Framing Industry to court for their environmental crimes, which is exactly what happened last month…

Climate Legal Action Necessary Response To Govt Inaction – NZCTU

The New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Te Kauae Kaimahi welcomes the legal action taken against the Minister of Climate Change by a coalition of legal experts as an important step in ensuring that Aotearoa meets its climate action obligations.

“We strongly support legal action to ensure that the Government is held to account for its legal obligations under the Climate Change Response Act,” said NZCTU President Richard Wagstaff.

“The union movement is deeply concerned by the Emissions Reduction Plan 2026-2030, which contains no significant policies to reduce emissions and will fail to get New Zealand meaningfully closer to our 2050 net-zero commitment.

“The actions – or lack of them – by this Government on climate change are the actions of climate deniers, not responsible leaders.

“Workers and communities need real political leadership that combats global emissions and invests in creating a just transition for industries and workers. We need leadership that develops and upholds long term consensus, not more U-turns.

“Instead, we have a government that cancelled 35 climate policies without consulting the public first, as required by law. Robust public engagement is essential.

“Climate policy is yet another area where this Government is prioritising corporate interests over democratic accountability and the interests of working people.

“Evidence is clear that a near-total focus on tree planting through vast pine forests is not a sufficient response – we must reduce emissions at source.

“Alongside the weak emissions budget, in Budget 2025 we saw a total abdication of responsibility on climate change and ensuring a Just Transition for working people in an increasingly volatile world.

“The NZCTU supports bold climate action to reduce emissions, adapt to the changing climate, and transition to a zero emissions economy that provides full employment for workers,” said Wagstaff.

…we must forget negotiating with them and use the law to force them to change their polluter ways.

If you are not incandescent with rage, you are not paying attention.

Ramming these changes through by abusing Urgency while no one is paying attention reminds you just how terrible this Government really is.

 

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

Govt’s $256m mine clean up highlights all that is wrong with Fast Track powers

While you are busy with Christmas, the Government has abused the power of Urgency to ram through controversial legislation without the usual due process and scrutiny, one power has been the outargues Fast Track powers to bypass environmental and community concerns when it comes to extraction capitalism.

Fast-track amendment passes under urgency, backtracks on controversial proposals

The government has passed an amendment to the fast-track regime under urgency overnight, backtracking on several of the more controversial proposals in the process.

We are already seeing the legacy of allowing mining without environmental protections come back to bite us…

Govt’s $256m mine clean up significantly higher than estimate

The Government will have to fork out $256 million to clean up the Stockton coal mine on the West Coast, a figure significantly higher than previous estimates.

Treasury has prepared a business case for the long-term management of acid mine drainage (AMD) in preparation for when BT Mining leaves the site about 35km north of Westport.

…and we are seeing the impact of Fast Track already undermining the present…

Offshore wind firm exits NZ as seabed mine seeks consent

An offshore wind developer warned the Taranaki seabed mine would render its planned farm unviable. Now it is closing up shop in NZ.

…the Fast Track powers are a sop for polluters to push ahead with damaging environmental projects regardless of the impact on local communities.

It shouldn’t be getting rammed through Parliament while an exhausted citizenship are too beaten down to respond.

 

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

ACT Party Boss Hog abuses power to tortue pigs

As the country staggers under the weight of the Government’s economic vandalism, ACT Party Boss Hogg tortures pigs for another decade while abusing urgency…

Government’s pig farming law changes passed through Parliament under urgency

The government’s law changes to pig farming have passed through Parliament under urgency.

The legislation cancels an upcoming ban on farrowing crates, which keep mother pigs confined to avoid them accidentally crushing piglets.

Instead of a ban, it gives farmers another 10 years to get used to slightly tougher restrictions than the status quo.

…TVNZ had the story on air, but for some reason haven’t put it up online, but Chris Lynch has the footage…

…the TVNZ NZ news story had Minister of Pork, Hoggard pretending sow crates are to save the little piglets and that changes were coming – IN 10 YEARS!

Minister defends decision to only consult pork industry on new pig welfare reforms

The Associate Agriculture Minister has defended his decision to only consult the pork industry and give them a decade to transition to new pig welfare reforms, during a grilling from opposition MPs.

His issue wasn’t the cruelty to the pigs, his issue was that the pig cruelty was being exposed!

Let’s be 100% honest about why we all love this story so much.

1 – He looks like a pig.

2 – His name is Hoggard.

3 – It’s another venal example of how crony capitalism seeps into everything these evil fucks touch.

That a corrupt hog of a man could lobby for his industry mates to ensure pigs stay suffering for a decade and make that decision by only talking to those whose interests he represents manages to highlight everything wrong with this disgusting government.

If the Left pulled stunts like this, you rednecks would be braying till the sun went down, but this Government makes decisions only with their mates, that’s democracy in action.

You hypocrites!

Every Kiwi who voted for this venal Government should be ashamed and mocked with contempt.

Let me double down.

That little piggy went to market,

That little piggy burned Rome,

That little piggy sold sad ham,

That little piggy exported none.

And that little piggy went …

ACT, ACT, ACT,
all the way home!

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

Political Caption Competition

Culture war Boomers determined to make New Zealand Old Zealand

The Daily Blog Open Mic – 21st December 2025

0

Announce protest actions, general chit chat or give your opinion on issues we haven’t covered for the day.

The Editor doesn’t moderate this blog,  3 volunteers do, they are very lenient to provide you a free speech space but if it’s just deranged abuse or putting words in bloggers mouths to have a pointless argument, we don’t bother publishing.

All in all, TDB gives punters a very, very, very wide space to comment in but we won’t bother with out right lies or gleeful malice. We leave that to the Herald comment section.

EDITORS NOTE: – By the way, here’s a list of shit that will get your comment dumped. Sexist abuse, homophobic abuse, racist abuse, anti-muslim abuse, transphobic abuse, Chemtrails, 9/11 truthers, Qanon lunacy, climate deniers, anti-fluoride fanatics, anti-vaxxer lunatics, 5G conspiracy theories, the virus is a bioweapon, some weird Bullshit about the UN taking over the world  and ANYONE that links to fucking infowar.

In Occupied Palestine – 18 December 2025

In Occupied Palestine

Zionism in practice

Israel’s Daily Toll on Palestinian Life, Limb, Liberty and Land

08:00, 18 December 2025 until 08:00, 19 December 2025

Sanction Israel

Gaza‘s death, injury and sickness totals continue to rise

18 19 December 2025:

Totals since 7 October 2023: killed 70,669 – wounded 171,165

The daily average number of men, women and children killed in Gaza is at least 88 and, that of those injured, is more than 213. A UN report states that, as of 14 January 2025, around 70% of those killed in Gaza were women and children.

UN OCHA Gaza Situation Report No. 50 18 December 2025

Israel secures record gas deal with Egypt and record arms deal with Germany

Drop Site Daily News: December 18, 2025

West Bank

Israeli Army attack – refugee camp: Jenin – the Israeli Army, firing live ammunition, continued its storming of the city and the refugee camp.

Israeli Army attack – refugee camp: Jenin – 16:25, Israeli Occupation forces, firing live ammunition, raided the village of Dhar al-Abd.

Israeli Army attack – 1 wounded: Jenin – 20:15, Israeli forces, firing live ammunition, raided the town of Qabatiya, wounding a resident: Majd Muhammad Abu Zaid.

Israeli Army attackshome invasions: Tulkarem – Israeli forces, firing live ammunition and tear gas canisters, continued to storm the city as well as the Tulkarem and Nur Shams refugee camps, invading and occupying homes, to use as military posts.

Israeli Army attack – 2 wounded including a minor: Nablus – 11:10-13:20, the Israeli Army, firing live ammunition, stormed the Askar refugee camp, wounding 14yearold Rami Madi Mahmoud Zalabia, and one other person: Mahdi Ahmed Nabil Al-Ghoul.

Home invasions in refugee camp: Tubas – 21:5023:30, the Israeli Army raided the Al-Far’a refugee camp and searched a number of houses.

Home invasion: Nablus – 17:30, Israeli Occupation forces raided the village of Burqa and searched a home.

Home invasions: Hebron – 12:40-14:05, Israeli forces raided the town of Surif and invaded several houses.

Home invasions beating-up and injury: Hebron – 14:10, the Israeli Army raided the town of Al Samou, invading several homes and severely beating-up and hospitalising a resident: Ayyoub Mahmoud Al-Hawamdeh.

Israeli police and settlers’ mosque violation: Israeli settlers, escorted by Occupation police, invaded the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound and molested worshippers.

Occupation settler violence: Ramallah – 12:05, Israeli Occupation settlers invaded the village of Ein Siniya and assaulted several workers in a factory.

Occupation settler terrorism: Ramallah – 18:15, Israeli settlers terrorised residents, in the Jabal al-Tall area of Sinjil.

Occupation settler raid and Israeli Amy complicity 3 taken prisoner: Tubas – 15:05, Occupation settlers, attempting to steal sheep in the village of Al-Hadidiya, were assisted by the Israeli Army, which took prisoner three people trying to resist the robbery.

Occupation settler stoning and agricultural sabotage: Tulkarem – 14:35, Israeli settlers stoned a home, on the outskirts of the village of Shufa, and damaged produce inside a greenhouse.

Occupation settler stoning: Qalqiliya – 23:20, Israelis, from the Kedumim Occupation settlement, stoned passing vehicles at the nearby roundabout on the main Qalqiliya-Nablus road.

Occupation settler vandalism: Nablus – 18:40, armed Israeli Occupation settlers invaded the Jabal al-Arma area of Beita, vandalising property and shooting at security cameras.

Occupation settler roadrage injury: Nablus – 02:20, an Israeli settler drove his motor vehicle into a pedestrian, Zein Dweikat, on Amman Street, east of Nablus, leaving him with a broken leg.

Occupation settler stoning: Hebron – 12:25, Occupation settlers invaded the Khallat Ghneim area, near Al-Samou’, and stoned people’shomes.

Raid – news suppression and populationcontrol: Ramallah – 00:45-02:15, Israeli Occupation forces raided the offices of the Al Jazeera satellite channel and ordered its closure, for the next 14 days.

Raid – 1 taken prisoner: Ramallah – 01:40, Israeli forces raided the town of Silwad, taking prisoner one person.

Raid – 1 taken prisoner: Ramallah – 02:15, the Israeli Army raided the village of Deir Jarir, taking prisoner one person.

Raid: Nablus – 08:30, Israeli troops raided the village of Rujeib and conducted patrols.

Raid – stun grenades fired: Nablus – 14:20, the Israeli military, firing stun grenades, raided and patrolled the town of Beita.

Raid: Nablus – 19:30, Israeli soldiers raided and patrolled the village of Qaryut.

Raid – stun grenades fired: Nablus – dawn, Israeli Occupation forces, firing stun grenades, raided and patrolled the village of Salem.

Raid: Salfit – 18:00, Israeli forces raided and patrolled the town of Al-Zawiya.

Raid: Salfit – 18:40-23:45, the Israeli Army raided and patrolled the village of Rafat.

Raid: Jericho – 07:15, Israeli troops raided and patrolled the city.

Raid – 1 taken prisoner: Hebron – 01:00, the Israeli military raided the town of Sa’ir, taking prisoner one person.

Raid – 1 taken prisoner: Hebron – dawn, Israeli soldiers raided the town of Kharsa, taking prisoner one person.

Budget Policy Statement Signals More Damage To Come For Vital Public Services – Fight Will Define Election Year – PSA

Today’s Budget Policy Statement effectively signals more cuts to public services in real terms in next year’s Budget despite our ageing population and other challenges and is a fight that will define election year.

“Cuts to public services are not the answer to our economic woes,” said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.

“We will be taking the case to New Zealand in the election year that much greater investment, not further cuts, is needed in public services.

“The Government has already done enormous damage with dangerous cuts across the public sector – including axing the science capability that would have driven innovation and improved productivity.

“Just $1 billion is available for new spending in Budget 2026, that won’t be enough to meet rising costs so services will inevitably suffer. It’s the only way government departments can make ends meet.

“Bottom line, we can’t afford more cuts. New Zealanders are already feeling the impact of reduced services while demands are growing. It’s little wonder so many Kiwis are leaving for better lives overseas.

“Finance Minister Nicola Willis says funding for health will be a priority in the next Budget, but we know that just won’t meet the needs of a system under severe strain already.

“This is about choices. The Government chose to give away $20 billion in income tax cuts, and handouts to landlords, big tobacco and business. These were the wrong choices.

“It should be pursuing tax reform to properly fund the services New Zealanders need and deserve.

“Instead, the Government is choosing austerity that will leave us less able to deal with an ageing and growing population, climate change, and our infrastructure deficit.

“Budget 2026 will sadly be more of the same; more short-sighted decisions that will have long-term consequences for the country’s ability to meet critical challenges.

“The PSA will be resisting any further cuts and reminding voters that in this critical election year in 2026, they will have a clear choice.”

Tania Waikato Announces Green Party Candidacy For The 2026 General Election – Green

Prominent lawyer, Tiriti advocate, and community leader Tania Waikato today announced that she will stand as a candidate in the 2026 general election for the Green Party of Aotearoa, citing a growing need for courageous leadership, economic justice, and a renewed national commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

The announcement follows a year of ground-breaking national advocacy by Ms Waikato across social media, legal forums, and public campaigns throughout 2025. Waikato – a seasoned litigation specialist with over 20 years’ experience – has featured heavily in national media for her work challenging the Treaty Principles Bill. She also spearheaded a petition against the school lunches debacle and was one of the key social media strategists behind the campaign against the Regulatory Standards Bill that saw 98.7% of almost 160,000 submissions in clear opposition to the controversial bill.

“It’s been a heck of a year. From Ministers accusing us of using submission “bots”, to inciting racist threats of violence against myself and my expert witnesses, we’ve seen over and over this government prioritising hate and division.

In contrast we’ve encouraged people to unite together with hundreds of thousands mobilising with us to write submissions against the TPB and the Regulatory Standards Bill, and now more than 72% of schools in Aotearoa have joined together in kotahitanga for Te Tiriti.

I had zero political aspirations at the start of this year, but the need is simply too great to continue to just advocate from the sidelines. Our people keep asking me to stand. I have to answer them. I’m standing to be a voice for them.”

During 2025, Ms Waikato emerged as a prominent public advocate through multiple media appearances, select committee submissions, and public campaigns addressing attacks on Te Tiriti, social inequity and government decision-making diminishing Māori rights. Her work has consistently focused on protecting vulnerable communities and holding power to account.

Waikato’s innovative harnessing of social media advocacy and legal action included representing over 17,000 claimants on behalf of Toitū Te Tiriti in the successful Waitangi Tribunal challenge against the Regulatory Standards Bill which found that the Act breached the Crown’s obligations of partnership and active protection. Her petition against the school lunches contract allocation to Compass Group garnered 17,418 signatures and arguably resulted in the Government’s quiet decision not to renew the contract with Compass in 2026.

Throughout 2025 I have worked alongside our communities who are being pushed to the edge by the cost-of-living crisis, serious attacks on our democracy, and the never-ending barrage of legislation undermining Māori and the Treaty partnership. Standing in the 2026 election is a natural continuation of that mahi—taking our fight for fairness and justice directly into Parliament”, Ms Waikato said.

More recently, Waikato has been at the forefront of the high-profile pushback by over 70% of schools across Aotearoa to the Government’s decision to remove the obligation on school boards to give effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. A list of schools compiled by Waikato called “Te Rārangi Rangatira”, started after schools began sending her copies of complaint letters to the education Minister. The schools’ list has gone viral across her social media platforms, gaining more than 16 million views in less than a month.

I started posting the list of schools as a way of acknowledging their stand for continuing to give effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi, which as a mother, was something very important to me. More and more schools kept sending me their letters so I kept updating the list and we’re now at more than 1,800 schools out of a total of just over 2,500. The Minister said making the list was “disgusting behaviour” and “not helpful” – but I think it shows a beautiful spirit of kotahitanga and hope at a time when our country is in desperate need of both.”

Ms Waikato’s 2026 campaign will centre on three key priorities, aligned with core Green Party policy frameworks:

REDUCING POVERTY AND TACKLING THE COST-OF-LIVING CRISIS

Ms Waikato is campaigning for bold action to address spiraling housing, food, and energy costs that are forcing thousands of families into hardship.

Key priorities include:

  • Major public housing expansion and tackling energy and food costs through regulatory intervention to stop corporate greed resulting in out-of-control costs for Kiwi households.
  • Free or low-cost access to essential services including healthcare, dental, prescriptions, and public transport.
  • A living wage that reflects the true cost of living in Aotearoa.
  • Strengthening income support to ensure that no one lives below the poverty line.
  • A wealth tax and key tax reforms as outlined in the Green budget to provide the necessary revenue to properly fund well-functioning health, education and public services.

“The cost-of-living crisis in Aotearoa is not accidental—it is the result of political choices. We can, and we must, choose differently,” Ms Waikato said.

BOOSTING THE ECONOMY AND CREATING JOBS THROUGH TURBO-CHARGING

THE MĀORI ECONOMY

Ms Waikato is calling for transformative regulatory support and investment in the Māori economy as a driver of sustainable national growth.

Her economic platform includes:

  • Forming bold, job-creating partnerships with Iwi and Māori-led enterprises to kick start large renewable energy projects, revive the housing and construction industry, and open up innovative land development opportunities.
  • Support for rangatahi employment, trades training, and green jobs.
  • Strengthening regional economies through Iwi and Māori entity partnerships, focusing on sustainable development of local businesses and local resources.

I’ve been privileged to work with multiple large, successful Māori entities throughout my career. The Māori economic base is now worth over $126 billion and growing rapidly. Supporting a strong Māori economy is not just good for Māori, it’s good for the whole country”, she said.

HONOURING TE TIRITI O WAITANGI

At the heart of Ms Waikato’s campaign is a firm commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi as the constitutional foundation of Aotearoa.

Her Tiriti commitments include:

  • Seeking the repeal of legislation including the Regulatory Standards Bill, the MACA amendments and the Education and Training Act changes that undermine Te Tiriti and Māori interests.
  • Proper resourcing of kaupapa Māori services across health, housing, education, and justice, including the re-establishment of Te Aka Whaiora – the Māori Health Authority.
  • Implementing constitutional reform to protect Te Tiriti o Waitangi from ongoing attacks.

Te Tiriti o Waitangi is not just symbolic—it is a living promise that unites tangata whenua and tangata Tiriti. As our founding constitutional document, Te Tiriti provides us with the blueprint to become the world’s leading example of strong, harmonious race relations in a country that champions mutual respect, compassion and justice. Te Tiriti can, and will, protect us all in the years to come”, Ms Waikato said.

Ms Waikato will formally begin her campaign in January 2026 and plans to attend Waitangi Day in February to make further announcements regarding her 2026 campaign. She will also be appearing at other speaking events throughout the country as an academic – Ms Waikato holds a Master of Laws with First Class Honours from the University of Auckland – and as a motivational speaker for rangatahi and community groups.

My campaign will be about people who feel locked out of power reclaiming their voice. The 2026 election is our chance to build a more harmonious and just society where people can afford to feed their whānau, find good jobs in an economy that works for everyone and live in a country that finally honours its founding promise. It’s time for all of us to be the change we want to see in Aotearoa. We are all in the same waka, and we need to start paddling in the same direction, together. Kotahitanga isn’t just a word, it’s a call to action.”

Waikato confirmed that she will be seeking a place on the Green party list and also standing in an electorate which will be formally announced in February 2026 once party selection processes have been completed.

Govt Must Explain Use Of Public Funds – Labour

A 163-page OIA dump on the Friday before Christmas raises further questions for the Auditor-General over the Government’s decision to spend public money on social media advertisements targeting striking workers.

The documents expose striking inconsistencies over how deeply Christopher Luxon was involved in the decision for the Public Service Commission to use social media advertising that targeted nurses, teachers, and other public sector workers.

“The documents suggest that the offices of both the Prime Minister and the Public Service Minister were heavily involved in the decision to publish advertisements thatattack the position of striking workers, despite officials’ concerns that those advertisements did notcomply with the Public Service Commission’s own social media guidelines,” Labour’s Public Service spokesperson Camila Belich said.

“This Government now appears to be meddling in the independence of the public service to manage the message for political gain, with the timing and handling of the release raising serious questions about the role of the Prime Minister’s Office.

“The release also confirms the PSC was willing to spend up to $10,000 for the campaign, an extraordinary use of public funds.

“While the Public Service Commission has announced a review of the advertising campaign, there has been no clarity on who is conducting it or what its terms of reference will be – raising further questions about transparency and accountability.

“This is not enough. The Auditor-General has the independence and authority to get to the bottom of this. New Zealanders deserve to have confidence in the political neutrality of our public institutions,” Camilla Belich said.

Camilla Belich wrote to the Office of the Auditor-General in November requesting an inquiry under the Public Audit Act to establish whether the decision to purchase and run these advertisements was lawful, appropriate and within the scope of the public service’s statutory duties.

Mining rules rolled back – wetlands and biodiversity hotspots in the firing line – Greenpeace

The Government has today confirmed a major rollback of environmental protections, clearing the way for mining in and around wetlands, significant natural areas (SNAs), and highly productive soils – with new rules taking effect from 15 January 2026.

“Mining is one of the most environmentally destructive industries on the planet,” says Greenpeace campaigner Gen Toop. “These changes open the door for mining in places that should be strictly off-limits.

“Wetlands, old-growth forests, and our most fertile soils are vital for native wildlife, food security, and climate resilience – yet the Government is inviting mining corporations to dig them up. It’s short-sighted and reckless.”

The National Policy Statements for Freshwater Management, Indigenous Biodiversity, and Highly Productive Land have been amended to remove the requirement for mining projects to provide a public benefit. The amendments weaken the ‘gateway tests’ that determine whether mining can be considered in these areas.

“Mining should be prohibited entirely on our last remaining wetlands. Only around 10% of New Zealand’s wetlands remain and they play a crucial role in storing carbon, filtering water, and buffering against floods. Wetlands are simply too precious to mine,” says Toop.

“Yet, these changes are designed to let multinational mining giants carve up vitally important ecosystems, ship profits offshore, and do it without proving any public benefit to New Zealanders.”

The Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) on the changes admitted that the proposals were developed with industry lobby groups Straterra (now the New Zealand Minerals Council) and AQA, while Māori and environmental groups were not engaged. Officials also acknowledged there is limited evidence of a policy problem. The document reads:

“Due to the limited time available, it has not been possible to engage with Māori groups on these proposals… Officials developed our understanding of the problem definition through engagement with industry.”

Greenpeace says the announcement is part of a broader pattern of environmental deregulation by the Government – including last week’s changes to the Fast Track Act, slashing the methane target, and advancing controversial legislation to replace the Resource Management Act.

“This Government is dismantling environmental protections at breakneck speed,” said Toop. “We urge them to reverse course – because once these ecosystems are gone, they’re gone forever.”

Quality Over Speed: The Counterintuitive Strategy That Built a Nationwide Service Network

0

In an era where rapid scaling and aggressive growth dominate business headlines, one New Zealand entrepreneur took the opposite approach—and built a thriving nationwide operation as a result. Morgan Kircher’s journey transforming Alert Building Inspections from a single-person operation into a network spanning multiple locations across both islands proves that sometimes the slowest path to growth creates the strongest foundation.

His success challenges conventional wisdom about service business expansion. Whilst competitors rushed to grow quickly, Morgan deliberately chose constraints that made scaling harder. While others competed on price, he competed on expertise. Whilst the industry operated on opacity, he embraced radical transparency. Each decision seemed to make business harder in the short term—yet collectively they created a competitive position that’s nearly impossible to replicate.

The Real Problem Nobody Was Solving

Surface-level analysis suggested the building inspection market was simple: property buyers needed inspections, and hundreds of independent operators provided them. But Morgan identified a more nuanced reality. Buyers weren’t just looking for inspections—they needed qualified professionals who could deliver comprehensive reports quickly enough to make time-sensitive property decisions.

Many inspectors offered one or the other: qualified expertise with slow turnaround, or quick service with questionable credentials. Few delivered both simultaneously. This gap became the cornerstone of Alert’s value proposition: trade-qualified builders providing comprehensive reports within 24-48 hours.

The insight reveals a crucial lesson for service businesses: superficial market analysis identifies competitors, but deep customer understanding reveals genuine opportunities. The businesses that thrive don’t just solve obvious problems—they address the complete customer need that others overlook or consider too difficult to meet.

The Growth Constraint That Became a Competitive Moat

When expanding Alert Building Inspections, Morgan faced a critical decision: recruit quickly with lower standards, or grow slowly whilst maintaining quality requirements. He chose the harder path, insisting every inspector be a trade-qualified builder with extensive construction experience.

This decision created immediate challenges. Finding qualified builders willing to work within a network model isn’t easy. Expansion became frustratingly slow. Revenue growth lagged behind what aggressive recruitment could have achieved. Yet this constraint simultaneously created something invaluable: a quality standard competitors couldn’t easily match.

Inspectors like David and Joe brought decades of hands-on construction knowledge to every assessment. Craig’s background working in Auckland Council’s building section provided deep insight into compliance requirements. These weren’t simply people trained to spot defects—they were professionals who understood building systems, construction methods, and regulatory frameworks from years of direct experience.

The lesson challenges growth-at-all-costs thinking: sometimes your biggest constraints create your strongest advantages. Whilst rapid expansion feels exciting and slow growth feels frustrating, maintaining high standards builds long-term value that competitors struggle to replicate. The very requirement that made Alert’s expansion difficult—trade qualifications—simultaneously made their service quality nearly impossible for competitors to copy at scale.

Transparency as Strategic Weapon

In an industry where most operators required quote requests before revealing prices, Morgan made a bold decision: display pricing openly on Alert’s website. Standard pre-purchase inspections cost $499 plus GST. Verbal reports cost $299 plus GST. No hidden fees, no quote negotiations, no pricing games.

This transparency accomplished multiple strategic objectives simultaneously. It pre-qualified leads by filtering customers seeking unrealistically cheap services. It built trust by demonstrating openness and confidence. It reduced wasted administrative time by answering the most common initial question immediately. And it positioned Alert as a professional operation competing on value rather than trying to be the cheapest option available.

The strategy worked because Alert had genuine value to justify their pricing. Their inspections follow the New Zealand Standard for Property Inspections (NZS4306:2005). Their reports are accepted by all major banks. They carry full indemnity insurance. Every inspector brings trade qualifications and construction experience. These credentials support premium pricing whilst delivering genuine value.

The transparency gamble reveals an important principle: open pricing works when you’re confident in your value proposition. If you’re competing primarily on price, transparency might hurt. But if you’re competing on quality, expertise, and reliability, transparency becomes a trust-building tool that attracts better customers whilst repelling unprofitable enquiries.

The Network Model That Delivered Local Expertise at Scale

Rather than attempting to grow through a centralised operation, Alert established a network model with qualified inspectors in key population centres from Whangarei to Dunedin. This approach provided crucial advantages that centralised operations couldn’t match.

Local inspectors understand region-specific building challenges. They know how coastal weather affects Wellington properties. They recognise earthquake considerations relevant to Christchurch buildings. They understand clay soil movement patterns affecting Auckland foundations. They respond quickly without travel delays and build relationships within local property and real estate communities.

Yet they all operate under consistent quality standards, follow the same inspection protocols, use standardised reporting systems, and represent the same brand identity. The network model delivered both local expertise and systematic consistency—advantages typically considered mutually exclusive.

This demonstrates that scalable doesn’t always mean centralised. For location-dependent services, networks of local experts operating under consistent standards can outperform centralised operations. The key is establishing clear quality requirements and operational systems whilst allowing local adaptation where it genuinely adds value.

Strategic Diversification Without Dilution

Beyond standard pre-purchase inspections, Alert intelligently expanded into complementary services. Safe and Sanitary reports for council compliance issues. Methamphetamine testing addressing contaminated property concerns. Verbal inspection reports for time-critical situations. Commercial building assessments for business properties.

These services share crucial characteristics: they all leverage the same core expertise (building assessment) whilst addressing different customer needs and situations. They create multiple revenue streams without requiring completely different skill sets or dramatically different operational processes. They attract different customer segments without fragmenting the core business model.

This approach reveals effective diversification principles: identify adjacent opportunities that leverage existing expertise and infrastructure. Don’t chase unrelated revenue streams just because they seem profitable. Focus on services where your current competitive advantages remain relevant and valuable.

Technology as Enhancement, Not Replacement

Alert Building Inspections embraced technology systematically whilst maintaining focus on human expertise. Their website achieves exceptional performance scores and comprehensive search optimisation, ensuring potential customers find their services easily. Location-specific landing pages capture local search traffic. Digital report delivery ensures quick turnaround regardless of location.

But technology enhances rather than replaces the core value proposition. The inspections themselves still require experienced trade-qualified builders physically examining properties. Technology handles efficiency, convenience, and accessibility—whilst humans provide the expertise, judgement, and detailed assessment that creates actual value.

This balance demonstrates effective technology adoption: use it to amplify competitive advantages, not replace them. Let technology remove friction from customer acquisition and service delivery. But don’t eliminate the human expertise that makes your service genuinely valuable.

Principles That Transfer Across Industries

Alert Building Inspections’ success offers lessons applicable far beyond building inspections. Whether you operate a consulting practice, trades business, professional service, or local operation, the underlying principles remain relevant:

Deep customer understanding reveals opportunities shallow analysis misses. Don’t just identify what customers say they want. Dig deeper to understand their complete needs, frustrations, and decision-making constraints. The businesses that win are those addressing the full customer problem.

Growth constraints often create competitive moats. The requirements that make scaling difficult—specialist expertise, certification standards, quality thresholds—frequently create the strongest long-term advantages. Embrace constraints that strengthen your position even when they slow expansion.

Transparency works when value is genuine. If you’re confident in your value proposition, open pricing builds trust, pre-qualifies customers, and improves efficiency. If you’re not confident enough for transparency, that’s a signal to strengthen your offering rather than hide your pricing.

Scalability doesn’t require centralisation. For location-dependent services, networks of local experts operating under consistent standards can deliver both local knowledge and systematic quality. The key is establishing clear requirements whilst allowing beneficial local adaptation.

Effective diversification leverages existing strengths. Additional revenue streams work best when they use current expertise and infrastructure rather than requiring completely new capabilities. Look for adjacent opportunities, not unrelated ventures.

Technology should amplify, not replace, differentiators. Use technology for efficiency, convenience, and reach—but maintain the human expertise that creates genuine value and justifies premium pricing.

The Counterintuitive Path to Sustainable Success

Morgan Kircher’s journey building Alert Building Inspections challenges conventional wisdom about service business growth. He chose quality over speed, transparency over pricing games, systematic constraints over rapid expansion, and long-term positioning over short-term revenue maximisation. Each decision seemed to make business harder in the moment—yet collectively they created a competitive position that’s difficult to replicate and continues strengthening over time.

This approach demonstrates that traditional service industries still offer enormous opportunities for entrepreneurs who combine genuine expertise with strategic thinking. The businesses that thrive aren’t necessarily those with the most innovative technology or the flashiest marketing—they’re the ones that deeply understand customer needs, deliver consistent quality, and build systematic approaches to sustainable growth.

What market gaps are hiding in plain sight in your industry? Where could deliberate constraints create stronger competitive positions than aggressive expansion? What would transparency reveal about the confidence you have in your value proposition? The opportunities exist across countless service industries. The question is whether you’re willing to take the counterintuitive path that leads to sustainable success.



Three Greenpeace activists removed by police from Fonterra nitrate pollution protest during shareholder meeting – Greenpeace

Three Greenpeace activists have been removed by police from Fonterra’s downtown Auckland offices, following a protest this morning at the Shareholders’ Fund meeting over the corporation’s role in the contamination of rural communities’ drinking water.

Greenpeace spokesperson Sinéad Deighton-O’Flynn said “It’s easy for Fonterra executives in their shiny offices to ignore the growing nitrate crisis that they have caused in rural New Zealand, so we’ve brought the crisis to their front door.”

“Peoples’ health is being put at risk from contaminated drinking water. Canterbury has just declared a nitrate emergency. Fonterra is responsible for this.

“Fonterra and its investors are making a killing at the expense of peoples’ health and access to safe, clean drinking water – especially in Canterbury. It’s time for Fonterra to stop disregarding the health of rural communities, and prioritising the profits of its investors. That means cutting the herd size and ending the use of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser.”

The activists set up a decontamination tent outside Fonterra HQ and poured 2 metric tonnes of slime around the building. This represented the toxic slime found in rivers and lakes from e coli and nitrate contamination, and prevented shareholders from walking through main entrances.

GUEST BLOG: Ian Powell – Free Speech – the ethics of conviction and the ethics of responsibility

On 25 September Kwame Anthony Appiah, who teaches philosophy and law at New York University, had a paywalled article titled ‘Watch What You Say’ published by the New York Review of Books.

It is a fascinating read on his review of two books on free speech within an historical and contemporary perspective.

Thomas Paine’s right to free speech suppressed in late 18th century England

It begins with the successful government legal actions seeking to ban the sale of books by English-American revolutionary Thomas Paine’s in the late 18th century in England.

The reviewer  culminates with contemporary considerations which include debates over the First Amendment to the American constitution.

Two different ethics principles

Towards the end of his long article Appiah refers to the distinction between the ethics of conviction, which call on one to uphold their principles, and the ethics of responsibility, which require one to answer for the consequences of their actions in expressing these convictions.

Max Weber thought that ethics of responsibility trumped ethics of conviction in politics

This distinction was made by Max Weber (1864-1920), a German intellectual who was one of the central figures involved in the development of sociology and the wider social sciences.

In the context of politics he concluded that the ethics of responsibility were more important.

A local experience

At a lower much less significant level of politics I had an opinion piece published in a local Kāpiti Coast online publication KC News (1 December) critical of the Government’s announcement of its intention to abolish regional councils: Regional councils abolition.

I included a reference to a Kāpiti Coast District Council appointed senior manager publicly applauding the decision while her elected Mayor was publicly critical.

On the assumption (perhaps generous) that the former was speaking from conviction, it highlighted the connection of this ethic with the responsibility ethic.

A Kāpiti Coast debate

My opinion piece was posted on Facebook leading to two interesting conflicting responses.

Sean Rush (a rightwing former Wellington city councillor) argued free speech (and by implication conviction) while prominent local resident of more progressive politics Blanch Charles argued from the perspective of responsibility.

In Rush’s words:

Even staff are entitled to express their opinions. Or is it just opinions that you disagree with that are objectionable? …. she has a right to free speech though, right? She is able to voice an opinion even when it differs from a politician’s?

In Charles’ words:

She has a right in her private Iife but not when she speaks from her KCDC position. (I worked in the parliamentary precinct – in non-political positions in Ministers’ offices under both National & Labour governments – for a couple of years, and periodically for a further couple of years after that. I had my personal political views but it would have been sheer stupidity on my part, and likely deserving of censure or worse, had I spoken out publicly).

This woman was either unwise or arrogant to have spouted her mouth off publicly.

Moving to a higher level

Some political leaders are described as ‘conviction politicians’. A case in point is former British Conservative Party prime minister Margret Thatcher.

Margaret Thatcher was a strong conviction driven politician without regard to the consequences of her actions

Her strongly ideological conviction was to comprehensively extend the role of the ‘not-so-free market’ into economic and social life, including in the provision of public goods such as healthcare, education and transport.

It became known as neo-liberalism (I have discussed neo-liberalism in a previous Political Bytes post (17 January 2021): Neo-liberalism a misunderstood ideology.

As an aside, when asked what her greatest achievement was, Thatcher responded “Tony Blair.” She was probably right.

In other words, not only did she convert her own Conservative Party to neo-liberalism, she also, through Blair, converted the Labour Party to it even though the latter was less of a conviction driven politician. In fact, Blair took neo-liberalism further in the health system than Thatcher did.

However, while the consequences of neo-liberalism were beneficial for the ‘few’, they were devastating for the ‘many’.

In summary, this devastation was much increased impoverishment and all the terrible social and economic consequences that inevitably followed and whose legacy continues today.

And in Aotearoa New Zealand

Roger Douglas and Ruth Richardson were the finance ministers of the Labour government of the 1980s and the National government of the early 1990s respectively.

They were also ideological twins fully committed to introducing and entrenching neo-liberalism into the economic and social fabric of Aotearoa New Zealand.

Douglas began it under what was called ‘Rogernomics’ while Richardson extended and entrenched it with what was called ‘Ruthanasia’.

Both were adherents to the ethics of conviction but neither gave any regard to the ethics of responsibility.

As with the United Kingdom the impact in New Zealand was devastating – increased and entrenched impoverishment and the awful consequences that inevitably followed including poor housing, homeliness and rising acute health demand. Again, this legacy remains with us today.

Ethics of responsibility can strengthen free speech and ethics of responsibility

Free speech is critical to the functioning of a genuine democracy. Unfortunately the advocacy of free speech in New Zealand is compromised and constrained by the narrowly focussed rightwing agenda that drives the so-called ‘Free Speech Council’.

Genuine free speech is critical for the functioning of a democratic society. This includes as a prerequisite for those that advocate the ethics of conviction.

While Max Weber appears to be counterposing the respective ethics of conviction and responsibility, they can be complementary and mutually reinforcing.

If free speech driven by the ethics of conviction gives little or no regard to the ethics of responsibility then it is the kind of free speech that one has when one isn’t having genuine free speech.

But if the advocacy of ethics convictions is balanced by the ethics of responsibility, then genuine free speech is strengthened and empowered.

 

Ian Powell was Executive Director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, the professional union representing senior doctors and dentists in New Zealand, for over 30 years, until December 2019. He is now a health systems, labour market, and political commentator living in the small river estuary community of Otaihanga (the place by the tide). First published at Political Bytes