Home Blog Page 2

Budget Policy Statement Still Missing In Action – New Zealand Council of Trade Unions

1

The Government has released its Budget Policy Statement today, showing worsening economic forecasts with inflation falling more quickly than expected, caused by unemployment rising and growth stalling. However, the statement lacks information on what the Government intends to do in response, said CTU Economist Craig Renney.

“The Budget Policy Statement is supposed to provide guidance and certainty around the forthcoming Budget. Sadly, both are in short supply,” said Renney.

“The Government has replaced objectives that looked to lift New Zealanders’ wellbeing and tackle climate change with cuts to public services. Kiwis deserve better than this.

“By not providing any information on forthcoming spending allowances, we have no insight into how the Government is planning to invest in New Zealand. This note reads like 8 pages of excuses for not doing your homework.

“Promises to get back to surplus have gone out the window. After fearmongering for so long about our debt position, the BPS accepts that our debt levels are within the bounds of “prudence on debt sustainability”.

“This is the time for Government to be acting responsibly by investing in New Zealand and raising its productive future. However, instead they appear to be acting pro-cyclically – cutting investment and spending at a time when the economy is in the doldrums.

“The Government has no plan for sustainably growing the economy or creating good jobs. There is no case made for tax cuts, particularly tax cuts for higher-income earners or landlords. There is nothing to meet the demands of a growing population with higher needs. Instead, it’s a return to the rhetoric that justified sustained underinvestment in the public realm.

“New Zealanders who read the Budget Policy Statement will find it short of information and short of ideas. It’s not surprising that analysts weren’t allowed to access the Government lock-up for this information release, as they would have found little to say,” said Renney.

 

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Central Govt Should Pay Rates Like Everyone Else – Office of the Mayor of Auckland

0

Following adoptions of recommendations from both the Auckland Council Governing Body and the Houkura Independent Māori Statutory Board, the Mayor has formally requested the Government;

  • Pay rates on its own buildings in Auckland.
  • Reform laws around non-rateable land.
  • Transfer revenue equivalent to the GST charged on rates to Auckland Council.
  • Provide a share of the portion of GST collected on new residential builds.

In 2023/24 values, the total value of rates that central government is exempt from is estimated as $36,331,007.

Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown says it’s unfair the government doesn’t pay rates like everyone else, even though it uses council services.

“Why should central Government get a free ride? They use our infrastructure but don’t pay the bill.

$36,331,007 is a lot of money that should be returned to council for the upkeep of services to these properties.

This is already a key ask in my Manifesto for an Auckland deal. I know there is appetite for it, politically and publicly.”

There are also properties such as airports, port land, other transport use land, wharves, jetties and churches which are non-rateable under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002.

He says it’s old government laws like this one that are allowing private enterprises to get a free ride when Aucklanders are struggling to make ends meet. Law-reform would be required to bring the real-world application up-to-date.

“It seems odd to me, that a multi-billion dollar listed company such as Auckland International Airport Limited is sitting on hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of non-rateable land, when everyday Aucklanders are doing it tough.”

Council staff estimates show the total value of GST on rates in 23/24 was $415,350,000. If that money was returned to Aucklanders, it would enable rates to be 15% lower (a reduction in rates of 7.5% for the average household for the next financial year instead of the 7.5% increase proposed in the Long-term Plan central scenario, out now for public consultation). Staff estimates show for the 24/25 financial year, that would be an average savings per household of $506.40.

Mayor Wayne Brown says the Government takes far more than its fair share from Aucklanders.

“Aucklanders are being shortchanged. We put more into Treasury’s coffers than we get in return. We want a fair share of the revenue Auckland generates, and in this instance the government is smart enough to recognise this. I’m looking forward to the discussions here.”

There is no other local authority in Australasia responsible for governing a third of the national population, yet revenue gained from government transfers in comparable regions shows Auckland isn’t getting a fair deal.

He says it would bring Auckland in better alignment with our overseas counterparts.

“In size and scope, we are more akin to a State Government in Australia. Australian states receive 45% of their revenue through transfers from the federal government; Auckland Council receives a paltry 12%. No wonder we can’t keep up.”

He says Auckland is straining under the cost of residential growth and receiving a share of GST collected on new builds would be fitting.

“It also doesn’t make sense that council doesn’t receive a share of GST collected on new builds; we have to foot the bill for the infrastructure and other amenities needed for new builds, yet the money goes to Wellington? I’m also looking-forward to the conversations here.”

A return of GST on rates, and additionally that the Government pays rates on its own property, were recommendations from the 2023 Future for Local Government review. The review also recognised that the current local government funding and finance system was already under pressure and was not sustainable.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Call For Urgent Reassessment Of Disability Funding Cuts

0

Pou Tangata of the National Iwi Chairs Forum and Iwi Māori Partnership Boards Call for Urgent Reassessment of Disability Funding Cuts to Safeguard Tāngata Whaikaha and Whānau Hauā.

Pou Tangata of the NICF and Chairs of Iwi Māori Partnership Boards (IMPBs) express their concern regarding disability funding restrictions announced by Whaikaha, the Ministry of Disabled People. The recent changes to essential funding “undermines efforts to address the disparate health needs of whānau Māori living with disabilities” says Dame Naida Glavish, Chair of the Hauora ILG and Co-Chair of Pou Tangata.

Dame Naida Glavish further adds, “changing the rules for this funding will mean that many tāngata whaikaha and whānau hauā will be prevented from participating in cultural practices that often occur outside the towns and cities where they live.”

IMPBs, as representatives of local Māori perspectives and voices on health and disability outcomes, emphasise the critical importance of equitable access to services for tāngata whaikaha and whānau hauā. “The recent funding restrictions to disability services directly impact the health and dignity of tāngata whaikaha and whānau hauā,” states Oriana Paewai, Chair of Te Pae Oranga o Ruahine o Tararua IMPB.

“Such actions exacerbate existing barriers and further impede efforts to address the specific health and disability needs of Māori communities. Tāngata whaikaha and whānau hauā have been clear that they must be included in decisions about their care. Any move to reduce their ability for choice and control is extremely disrespectful,” says Ms Paewai.

Pou Tangata and the Chairs of Iwi Māori Partnership Boards stress the urgent need for the government, policy makers and Whaikaha senior leadership to reconsider these cuts through a collaborative and inclusive process that engages directly with affected communities. To seek solutions that uphold the dignity and rights of tāngata whaikaha and whānau hauā.

“Our role as Iwi Māori Partnership Boards is to advocate for policies and services that promote the well-being of all Māori,” says Tereki Stewart, Chair of Te Taumata Hauora o Te Kahu o Taonui IMPB and Lead Advisor, Hauora ILG. Pou Tangata Co-Chair Ms Glavish adds, “we urge decision-makers to prioritise the needs of Māori with disabilities and work towards a more equitable and inclusive system that enables them to live their best lives.”

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Concern For Child Safety Prompts Fresh Calls For Children’s Act Overhaul – Save The Children

0

There are concerns the legislation designed to keep New Zealand children safe is failing them.

Safeguarding Children New Zealand is calling for urgent changes to be made to the Children’s Act 2014, after obtaining legal advice from law firm Simpson Grierson on the question of whether any organisation engaging volunteers and private businesses who employ staff are legally obligated under the Children’s Act to undertake background checks for volunteering and working with children.

“As it stands, there is no legislative requirement in the Children’s Act to police vet volunteers in any organisation and no legislative requirement to police vet employees of non-government funded organisations or private businesses that provide services to children.

“This means most volunteers and many others who work with children are not legally required under that Act to undergo safety checks, despite the potential for them to engage in unsupervised, one-on-one contact with children,” Senior Safeguarding Consultant Ruth Browning says.

Browning says the news will come as a “total shock” to a lot of New Zealanders.

“When we take our children to sport, youth groups or perhaps even private music or math lessons, we would assume the people looking after them have undergone a safety check, including a police vet. What a lot of people don’t realise is we are relying on the goodwill and diligence around the health and safety considerations of organisations engaging volunteers and private businesses to do the right thing, because there is no legal requirement in the Children’s Act for them to do so.”

Browning, who has worked on the frontline as a social worker for more than 20 years, has written to Ministers outlining essential actions that would significantly reduce the potential for harm.

She says legislative change is needed to introduce a specific obligation into the Children’s Act, so we ensure those who are unsuitable to work with children are not able to use volunteering roles and private businesses as a way of accessing our most vulnerable. Clarity and full coverage is needed in our legislation.

“This is about protecting our children in settings where they have every right to feel safe, and right now, we’re failing them.”

Browning refers to the many examples in our media as well as the evidence presented to The Abuse in Care, Royal Commission of Inquiry to highlight that abuse within organisations is a huge issue with deep and persistent impacts.

“We need to apply all available prevention methods we have, starting with robust and specific legislation,” says Browning.

As well as improving safety checking provisions in the Children’s Act 2014, Safeguarding Children wants child protection training to be made mandatory for all people working with children.

“Right now, there is no legal requirement for teachers, GPs, or front-line children’s workers in New Zealand to be formally trained in safeguarding or child protection. This is leaving those with a duty of care to children, ill-equipped to fulfill that duty.” says Browning.

It is also not required by law to report child abuse when it is seen, heard or suspected.

“The workforce that we regularly train is asking for greater clarity in legislation so that the onus is not solely on them to decide what gets reported and when,” Browning says.

The following statement has been provided by Simpson Grierson and can be attributed to a firm spokesperson:

“The safety checking requirements in the Children’s Act do not presently apply to the majority of volunteers who work with children, and to all private businesses that provide services to children.

Yet we consider it is reasonable to expect all organisations to conduct safety checks on individuals likely to engage in unsupervised, one-on-one contact with children to meet the Health and Safety at Work Act obligations. Broadening the scope of the Children’s Act’s safety checking obligations would align well to confirm this expectation for organisations conducting work with children.”

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Please Submit On The Draft Government Policy Statement On Land Transport – Submissions Close At 12pm On 2 April 2024

0

Why it’s important to submit

As we told you in our March eBulletin, the new Government’s Draft Government Policy Statement on Land Transport (PDF, 2.3MB), known as the draft GPS, is a big disappointment for pedestrians. Newsroom covered some of the key problems:

“Funding for walking and cycle paths is set to nearly half from next year, while a change to the funding source for roadside footpaths could stretch that bank account even thinner.

“In his … draft government policy statement, Minister of Transport Simeon Brown simultaneously decreases funding for walking and cycling while restricting all footpath construction to this newly-limited part of the budget.”

In Living Streets Aotearoa’s media release commenting on the draft GPS, we said:

“A GPS that was truly focused on economic efficiency and safety would include much more investment in walking. We’re concerned that the Government is putting the lives of pedestrians – especially children and elderly and disabled people – at greater risk to promote its car-focused transport agenda.

“For the sake of our communities, for the sake of our health, and for the sake of our climate, New Zealand needs pedestrian-friendly transport policies.”

How to submit – and some suggested points to make

Submissions on the draft GPS are now open. They close at 12pm on 2 April 2024.

The Transport For All coalition has produced an excellent submission guide which does a lot of the work for you in creating your submission. But we suggest you also:

1) Talk about your own experience, and that of your whānau or family, and your community. What makes walking good for you? What are the barriers? How could and should the Government making walking better? If you’re a parent, what do your children need, in terms of vehicle speeds and safe footpaths, to be able to walk safely to school and around your community?

2) Include some specific submission points about walking, such as:

  • Walking and cycling should not be lumped together into the “walking and cycling improvements” funding category. Each is important and each should be funded separately. The Government should create a separate “walking improvements” funding category.
  • Walking funding (and cycling funding) should be increased, not slashed. Walking should receive at least 10% of the overall transport budget.
  • The proposal that new footpaths can only be funded from within the walking & cycling improvements category is a huge backward step. Footpaths alongside new roads should be provided and paid for out of the roading budget, and footpath maintenance shoiuld be paid for out of the road maintenance budget.
  • Increased vehicle speeds will kill and seriously injure more pedestrians. The recently-introduced measures to reduce vehicle speeds were a step in the right direction, and should be maintained and strengthened. (Please talk about what safer speeds mean for you and your family.)
  • The increased prevalence of very large vehicles are making roads less safe. These vehicles have been found in the US to be more likely to be driven into pedestrians, and more likely to kill them. New Zealand needs to adopt measures to deter the use of these vehicles in urban settings.

We encourage everyone to submit strongly in support of funding walking well and including walking as a central feature of all transport projects.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The Impact of Technology on the Casino Industry

0

Technology has completely transformed various aspects of our lives, and the casino industry is no exception. Advancements in technology have profoundly impacted how games are played and the overall casino experience. From the introduction of online gaming platforms to the integration of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies, the landscape of the casino industry has evolved significantly.

These technological innovations have not only expanded the reach of casinos but have also enhanced the gaming experience for players. For instance, the availability of mobile gaming apps allows players to enjoy their favorite casino games on the go, while VR and AR technologies create immersive and interactive environments. Additionally, casinos often offer enticing incentives such as free $100 pokies no deposit sign up bonus to attract new players and retain existing ones, further enhancing the allure of online gambling platforms.

Evolution of Casino Technology

In the early days of casinos, technology was limited to mechanical slot machines and basic table games. However, with the advent of digital technology, casinos have undergone a dramatic transformation. Today, state-of-the-art gaming software, high-definition displays, and immersive sound systems create an unparalleled gaming experience for players.

  • Enhanced Gaming Experience: Cutting-edge gaming software and high-definition displays create visually stunning and immersive gameplay experiences for players.
  • Improved Operational Efficiency: Digital technology streamlines casino operations, facilitating smoother transactions and optimizing resource allocation.
  • Enhanced Security Measures: Biometric recognition systems and advanced surveillance technologies bolster security measures within casinos, deterring fraud and enhancing patron safety.
  • Personalized Customer Experiences: Data analytics and customer relationship management (CRM) systems personalize services and promotions based on individual preferences.
  • Integration of Emerging Technologies: Casinos embrace emerging technologies such as AI and VR to enhance the gaming experience and differentiate themselves in the market.

Mobile Gaming

The surge in smartphone and tablet usage has significantly propelled the expansion of the online gambling sector, reshaping how players engage with casino games. Mobile gaming apps have revolutionized accessibility, enabling players to enjoy their favorite games whether they’re on the move or relaxing at home. These apps offer a seamless experience, mirroring the features and functionalities of desktop casinos.

  • Enhanced Convenience: Mobile gaming apps allow players to access casino games anytime, anywhere, offering unparalleled convenience and flexibility. Whether waiting in line or at home, players can indulge in their favorite games with ease.
  • Seamless Experience: Mobile casinos provide the same features as desktop counterparts, ensuring a seamless gaming experience across all devices. Players can transition between platforms without sacrificing quality.
  • Broadened Audience: Mobile gambling appeals to a diverse audience, attracting both casual players and enthusiasts. This expanded reach contributes to growth, driving increased revenue and engagement.
  • Technological Advancements: Ongoing advancements enhance the gaming experience on smartphones and tablets. Casinos leverage innovations to offer immersive gameplay and features.
  • Regulatory Considerations: With the rise of mobile gambling, regulators face challenges in ensuring responsible gaming practices. Frameworks must adapt to address the unique characteristics and mitigate potential risks.

 

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality

The integration of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technology into the casino industry has ushered in a new era of immersive gaming experiences. VR casinos transport players to virtual worlds, offering opportunities to interact with fellow players and explore incredibly lifelike environments. On the other hand, AR technology enhances the real world by overlaying digital elements, creating an augmented reality gaming experience that blurs the boundaries between the virtual and the physical.

Furthermore, the adoption of VR and AR technologies is not only revolutionizing the way players engage with casino games but also opening doors to innovative opportunities for the industry. By providing unparalleled levels of immersion and interactivity, VR and AR casinos are attracting a new generation of gamers and redefining the standards for entertainment in the digital age. As these technologies continue to evolve and become more accessible, the future of the casino industry looks increasingly dynamic and captivating.

Security and Fair Play

Technology advancements have significantly enhanced security measures and fairness in the casino industry, ensuring a safe and equitable gaming environment for players. Cutting-edge encryption techniques and robust payment gateways work in tandem to safeguard users’ personal and financial data, thwarting unauthorized access attempts effectively.

  1. Strengthened Security Measures:
    • Advanced encryption protocols fortify the protection of sensitive information, rendering it virtually impenetrable to cyber threats.
    • Secure payment gateways facilitate seamless transactions while shielding financial details from potential breaches.
  2. Ensuring Fair Play:
    • Random number generators (RNGs) play a crucial role in maintaining fairness by producing unpredictable outcomes in casino games.
    • These RNG algorithms undergo rigorous testing and certification to guarantee unbiased results, instilling confidence in players.
  3. Continuous Innovation:
    • Ongoing technological innovation drives further improvements in security and fairness within the casino industry.
    • From biometric authentication to blockchain technology, new solutions are constantly emerging to address evolving threats and challenges.
  4. Regulatory Compliance:
    • Casinos must adhere to stringent regulatory standards concerning security and fairness to maintain licensure and uphold industry integrity.
    • Regular audits and compliance assessments ensure that casinos meet regulatory requirements and operate ethically.
  5. Consumer Trust:
    • By prioritizing security and fairness, casinos cultivate trust among players, fostering long-term relationships and loyalty.
    • Transparent policies and proactive communication regarding security measures bolster confidence in the integrity of online gambling platforms.

These advancements underscore the commitment of the casino industry to providing a secure and equitable gaming experience, reinforcing its position as a trusted entertainment destination for players worldwide.



TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Comparative Analysis: Minimum Deposit vs. No Deposit Casinos

0

The landscape of online gambling is vast and varied, offering an array of options for players of all preferences and budgets. Among these, minimum deposit and no deposit casinos stand out as particularly appealing choices for different reasons. This article comprehensively compares these two types of casinos, helping you easily navigate your options.

 

Understanding Minimum Deposit Casinos

In the realm of minimum deposit casinos, not only does the player benefit from the reduced financial risk and accessibility, but they are also presented with a wide array of gaming options. These platforms, mentioned by the Wagering Advisors, defy the misconception that lower deposits equate to a limited selection of games. On the contrary, many minimum deposit casinos boast a diverse portfolio of games, including popular slots, table games, live dealer options, and more. This variety ensures that players can find games that match their preferences and playing styles, making the online casino experience both enriching and entertaining. Moreover, the opportunity to try different games with minimal investment allows players to explore new genres and titles they might not have considered otherwise, enhancing their gaming journey.

The Appeal of $5 Minimum Deposit Casinos

One of the most attractive aspects of minimum deposit casinos is their accessibility. They allow players to enjoy their favorite games without a significant financial commitment. A prime example is the $5 minimum deposit casinos, which offer a balance between affordability and the chance to win real money. Players looking to explore these offers can find valuable information on various platforms, which thoroughly explore $5 minimum deposit casino offers and get the best win. So, what are the advantages of minimum deposit casinos?

  • Affordability: Small initial deposits reduce the barrier to entry for new players.
  • Risk Management: Lower deposits mean players can manage their gambling budget more effectively, reducing the risk of significant financial loss.
  • Access to Bonuses: Many minimum deposit casinos offer welcome bonuses, even with low deposits, enhancing the gaming experience.

Minimum deposit casinos present a golden opportunity for both novice and seasoned players to dive into the thrilling world of online gambling with minimal financial pressure.

Navigating No Deposit Casinos

No deposit casinos provide a platform for risk-free exploration and potential wins without initial investment, and serve as a strategic stepping stone for players aiming to enhance their gambling skills. These casinos offer an invaluable opportunity to understand the mechanics of various games and develop strategies without the pressure of diminishing a deposited fund. It’s a unique environment where the freedom to experiment with betting patterns, explore different game types, and refine gaming tactics is fully supported. This benefit is particularly advantageous for beginners discovering their preferences and experienced players testing new strategies.

The No Deposit Advantage

No deposit casinos are incredibly appealing for their offer of playing without the need to invest any money upfront. They stand out for their immediate appeal and the diverse opportunities they present to newcomers and seasoned players. This unique model of online gaming allows individuals to explore a wide array of games and platforms without the financial commitment typically associated with gambling. Below, we delve into the various facets that make no deposit casinos a preferred choice for many.

  • Risk-Free Exploration: Players can try out games and platform features without financial commitment.
  • Win Real Money: There’s the potential to win real money without making a deposit, though this often comes with higher wagering requirements.
  • Learning Opportunity: New players can learn the ropes of online gambling without the pressure of losing their money.

These benefits create a compelling proposition for novice and experienced gamblers. These casinos not only democratize access to gambling by removing financial barriers, but also nurture a learning environment where players can grow, strategize, and potentially profit without the traditional stakes. As the online casino landscape continues to evolve, no deposit casinos remain a beacon for those looking to dip their toes into the vast and varied world of online gambling with minimal risk and maximum potential for discovery and enjoyment.

 

Conclusion

Choosing between minimum and no deposit casinos depends largely on the player’s budget, risk tolerance, and what they want from their online gambling experience. No deposit casinos offer a compelling option for those new to online casinos or those who prefer to gamble with minimal financial risk. However, for players willing to make a small financial commitment for the chance to win real money and access broader game selections, minimum deposit casinos could be the better choice.




TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

How to See the Maximum Rating for Any Casino?

0

Casinos are distinct points of excitement and potential wealth in the constantly changing gaming and entertainment landscape. Whether you’re a seasoned gambler or a curious visitor, understanding how to assess a casino’s rating is crucial in selecting the best gaming experience tailored to your preferences. This piece examines the subtleties of Casino reviews and ratings to assist you in making an informed decision about where to place your bets.

Understanding Casino Ratings:

Casino ratings are comprehensive evaluations that consider a multitude of factors to gauge the quality, reliability, and overall appeal of a casino. These ratings are typically generated by independent bodies, customer reviews, and industry experts, providing a multifaceted view of the casino’s performance. The criteria for these ratings often include the variety of games offered, customer service quality, overall atmosphere, security measures, and the availability of amenities and accommodations.

The Role of Regulatory Bodies and Independent Auditors

A significant component of a casino’s rating comes from the assessments made by regulatory bodies and independent auditors. These entities ensure that casinos operate within legal and ethical standards, offering fair play and protecting the rights of patrons. Reputable regulatory bodies’ certifications and licenses, like those from the Nevada Gaming Control Board, the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA), or the Gambling Commission, are signs of high standards of operation.

Leveraging Customer Reviews and Feedback

In the digital age, customer reviews and feedback play a pivotal role in shaping the reputation of casinos. Platforms and specialized casino review sites offer insights from real customers who share their experiences. While navigating through these reviews, it’s essential to look for patterns in feedback, considering both positive and negative comments to get a balanced view.

Analyzing the Game Selection and Entertainment Value

The variety and quality of games are cornerstone factors in Casino reviews and ratings. A top-rated casino usually offers more games, including slots, table games, poker, and live dealer games, catering to different preferences and skill levels. The presence of games from renowned software developers also speaks volumes about the casino’s commitment to providing a high-quality gaming experience.

Evaluating Amenities, Services, and Atmosphere

Beyond the gaming floor, the availability of amenities such as restaurants, bars, hotels, and entertainment shows significantly contribute to a casino’s overall rating. These services enhance the customer experience, making the casino a comprehensive entertainment destination. The atmosphere and decor of the casino also play a crucial role, with top-rated casinos often boasting stunning designs and a welcoming environment.

The Power of Peer Reviews

In today’s digital age, customer feedback on platform Reviews is invaluable. These reviews provide real-world insights into the casino’s operations, customer service, and overall visitor experience. High ratings in these forums indicate a consistently strong performance from the casino when there are a lot of reviews.

Making the Most of Casino Ratings

It is advisable to check with more sources, such as independent review sites, official regulatory websites, and direct customer feedback, to know the maximum rating for any given casino. By combining information from these different sources, you can get a complete picture of the benefits and drawbacks of a casino. Remember that while a casino’s high rating can indicate its quality, your personal preferences and interests should also play a role in your decision.

Conclusion

A casino’s maximum rating is established by evaluating several factors, such as game selection, security procedures, customer service, and regulatory compliance. By leveraging a combination of official ratings, independent reviews, and personal experiences, you can identify the best casino that meets your entertainment needs. Whether you’re looking for a luxurious retreat or a vibrant gaming floor, understanding how to interpret casino ratings is your first step toward a memorable and enjoyable gambling experience.



TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Public Submissions Open On Auditor-General’s Infrastructure Report – The Finance and Expenditure Committee

0

The Finance and Expenditure Committee is calling for public submissions on a report of the Controller and Auditor-General, Making infrastructure investment decisions quickly.

Scope of submissions:

The Finance and Expenditure Committee is seeking submissions that specifically comment on:

  • the three recommendations the Controller and Auditor-General has made in his report
  • how the process for government infrastructure investment could be improved
  • how public reporting on government infrastructure investment could be improved
  • how the Investment Management System could be improved.

The Finance and Expenditure Committee is focused on improving government investment management and public reporting, rather than contesting the details of specific infrastructure projects.

Tell the Finance and Expenditure Committee what you think:

Use this link to make a submission by 11.59pm on 8 May 2024.

Related material to inform your submission:

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

The TDB Daily 27th March 2024 – Best NZ Left, Independent and Progressive Politics opinion daily reading list

0

Best NZ Left, Independent and Progressive Political opinion daily reading list

Because so much of the mainstream media is polluted by right wing free market ideologues pushing corporate interests:

TDB daily collates the best NZ Left Wing, Independent and Progressive Political Opinion and includes the best international voices.

Unlike Victoria University’s The Democracy Project, this will never be behind a Paywall.

We promise we will never link to The Spinoff.

DOMESTIC:

 

No Right Turn – The SIS turns Parliament into liars again

The Kākā by Bernard Hickey – The elephants still in Chris Bishop’s infrastructure room

Newsroom – Surplus in 2027 ‘not achievable’ on current forecasts – Willis

Waatea News – Military resonating in Māori mind

RNZ – Budget Policy Statement: Willis promises cuts despite late return to surplus

Chris Lynch Christchurch’s Newsroom – Auckland University removes “segregation” sign

The Daily Blog – Malcolm Evans – Forget China, our own spooks helped the US hack us!

The Daily Blog – Tim Selwyn – Hipkins: slogans are not solutions… and caretakers are not architects.

The Daily Blog – If Destiny Church truly feared child abuse, wouldn’t they be attacking Churches rather than Drag Story Time Libraries?

The Daily Blog – Deep State vs NZ Democracy vs China Hack

The Daily Blog – Smell the fear from John Key as Luxon’s weakness and venal self interest threaten stability in NZ

The Daily Blog – Will 2024 be the tipping point for Methane Hydrates?

 

INTERNATIONAL:

Crikey – ‘Truthful, not neutral’: Why the ABC’s ‘impartiality’ warning isn’t the full story

International Clearing House – ISIS-K: the ultimate can of worms

Caitlin Johnstone – The Empire Slowly Suffocates Assange Like It Slowly Suffocates All Its Enemies

Jacobin – Joe Biden’s Support for Israel Might Cost Him the Election

The Washington Post – Supreme Court skeptical of efforts to restrict access to abortion pill

Haaretz – Israel-Hamas War Day 173 | Israeli Hostage Uriel Baruch Was Killed on Oct. 7, Body Held by Hamas in Gaza, Family Says

The Guardian – Biden administration’s Gaza strategy panned as ‘mess’ amid clashing goals

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Forget China, our own spooks helped the US hack us!

30

That our media should suddenly be alleging China conducted a cyber-attack on New Zealand’s parliament back in 2021, reportedly long known about by the GCSB but only now being revealed, looks like a desperate attempt to divert our attention from revelations “the GCSB facilitated a U.S. intelligence operation capable of supporting military actions for nearly a decade without the New Zealand government’s knowledge.”

As Mick Hall, the RNZ reporter fired for adding balance to news agency wire stories, writes; a report has revealed that a signals intelligence system embedded in the country’s Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) ran from 2012 to 2020 without ministerial knowledge or approval after a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed in secret.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Cancellation Of Multiple LGBTQ+ Library Events Shows The Harmful Impact Of Disinformation – The Disinformation Project

4

Research group The Disinformation Project says that safety concerns leading to the cancellation of two rainbow storytime events at community libraries is evidence of the growing impact of disinformation in Aotearoa.

“We’ve seen a clear rise in LGBTQ events becoming the target of New Zealand’s disinformation networks. This is especially true of diversity and inclusion initiatives from local Councils or any LGBTQ events for young people or rainbow families,” says Director of Communications Nicole Skews-Poole.

Online hatred towards LGBTQ communities, especially trans and non-binary people, has been growing in Aotearoa in the last two years. Just under a year ago, The Disinformation Project published a snapshot report which outlined the growth of transphobia in disinformation networks.

“Disinformation about transgender people is a popular theme of conspiratorial disinformation channels in New Zealand, including online networks and offline groups like Destiny Church. Critically, the messaging in these groups mirrors that from right-wing and fundamentalist lobby groups from overseas,” says Skews-Poole.

“These networks seek to dehumanise already marginalised groups of people and frame them as risks to society,” says Skews-Poole, noting that “the messaging is copied from the way gay men were targeted by homophobic lobby groups in the 1960s and onwards.”

The research group says that the silencing effect (also known as the “chilling effect”) of disinformation becomes evident when initiatives to promote diversity are cancelled, and eventually viewed as too risky to consider because of the corresponding threats of violence and harassment.

“We have a serious issue when libraries don’t feel safe to showcase and celebrate local diversity because groups of people have come to believe false and harmful ideas about other members of their communities.”

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

NZ Unites For Intergenerational Climate Strike – School Strike 4 Climate

0

On Friday 5 April, Aotearoa New Zealand will witness a historic moment as individuals from all corners of the nation come together to demand urgent climate justice. The Climate Strike will see tens of thousands of people take to the streets, and is expected to be as big as the 2019 mobilisations. Currently, over 10 events are organised. Spearheaded by a coalition of organisations including School Strike 4 Climate NZ and Toitū Te Tiriti, this nationwide climate strike aims to amplify the voices of the people and demonstrate the scale and strength of momentum for courageous leadership that puts people and planet first.

In the face of the ever-escalating climate crisis, the urgency for action has never been clearer. From extreme weather events to biodiversity loss, the impacts of climate change are felt across the globe, including here in New Zealand. Recognising the need for immediate and decisive action, diverse groups and communities are joining forces to send a powerful message to the new Government, and also to leaders and policymakers at all levels.

The April 5 Climate Strike will be a testament to the strength of collective action. Students, activists, indigenous communities, environmental organisations, businesses, and concerned citizens will unite in solidarity, calling for bold measures to address the climate emergency. By coming together, they aim to inspire change, raise awareness, and mobilise support for policies that prioritise sustainability, equity, and justice.

The demands of the strike include:

Oil and gas ban to remain in place: A transition away from using oil and gas, and other greenhouse gas-emitting industries. Keep the ban on oil and gas exploration!

Toitū te Tiriti: Hands off Te Tiriti, it’s our guiding star. Uphold Te Tiriti o Waitangi in all policies and actions.

Slow down the fast track: Prioritize people over profit. End legislation that fast-tracks environmentally damaging projects without environmental assessments and community consultation.

Protect our moana and conservation land: Oppose mining and drilling activities. Support Indigenous-led conservation efforts and initiatives that promote sustainable practices. NO new mines and keep your drills off our seabed and conservation land.

Climate education for all: Inspire rangatahi to become advocates for environmental protection, climate action, and the preservation of our planet for future generations. Ensure that climate education is accessible to everyone, regardless of age, background, or location.

Additionally, the strike stands in solidarity with the call to Free Palestine, demanding emergency humanitarian visas to Palestinians with family in Aotearoa, providing urgent humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian people, and demanding an end to Israel’s illegal occupation and blockade of Palestinian Territories.

The April 5 Climate Strike will feature a range of events, including marches, rallies, educational workshops, and community-led actions, taking place across cities and towns nationwide. Information can be found on the SS4C NZ Facebook page here.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

SFO Welcomes Court Of Appeal Decision On Political Donations Case – Serious Fraud Office

0

The SFO welcomes the Court of Appeal’s decision today which corrected the High Court findings in its New Zealand First Foundation (NZFF) case and reinforced the importance of transparency around political donations in a democratic system.

Following the NZFF trial in 2022 the High Court found “if the money is ‘party donations’, there is comprehensive evidence [the accused] deployed the dishonest scheme in order to deceive the party and party secretary as to their better claims to the money…”.

However, the Judge concluded that because the nearly $750,000 of funds were not deposited into the party’s account, they were not party “donations” under the Electoral Act, despite the clear intention of donors.

The Crown argued that this finding was wrong and today the Court of Appeal agreed that the Judge erred in finding the donations were not party “donations” under the Electoral Act. The Court of Appeal also left undisturbed the original conclusion that the two defendants had engaged in a “dishonest scheme” and intentionally and deceptively misled the party about the nature of the donations.

The Court noted that the respondents held themselves out to be collecting party donations and that using a trust as the recipient of the payments did not relieve them of responsibilities under the Electoral Act, given their roles within the party.

Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed on the basis of the second ground of appeal regarding claim of right. Due to “an unfortunate lacuna in the [High Court] Judge’s reasoning”, despite the finding that the respondents had acted dishonestly, the Court held that Crown was not in a position to advance an argument of error of law on this point.

“Today’s findings reinforce the importance of both taking the original case, but also appealing the High Court’s decision,” says SFO Director Karen Chang.

“Transparency is key to a well-functioning democracy. New Zealanders have a right to know who is funding our political parties, and this right should not be as easily circumvented as through depositing funds into a trust.

“Parliament also recognised this in introducing urgent changes to the Electoral Act as a direct response to this case. Today’s decision confirms that it was always Parliament’s intention that such funds would be considered “donations” under our electoral laws.

“A robust electoral integrity framework is fundamental for upholding the principles of democracy, protecting citizens’ rights, and ensuring the stability and legitimacy of government, as reflected by the recent Independent Electoral Review.”

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

Hipkins: slogans are not solutions… and caretakers are not architects.

23
Why the Fuck is Chippy feeding the Trolls on The Platform?

Drop kick Chip made his own state of the nation speech at the weekend.  At least I think that’s what it was. Everyone else had done their speeches – was he waiting for the relevance level to hit retro before doing the #SOTN meme? Was he trying to avoid it?

It must have been the weekend because he didn’t have a tie on, but then… who makes a major speech like he’s off-duty? Is he on or off, is it serious or not? Where’s the flag? Is this not a state of anything? Trying so hard and never looking the part. The demeanour: so surprisingly smug for someone who so recently shepherded their party into the jaws of defeat without any concerns at all – before or after. Seemingly oblivious. The secret soviet autopsy he ordered must have shown he didn’t do it. It wasn’t me – it was 27% when I got here, honest.

With the gravitas of a head prefect he makes this speech, shall we say, about the nation, rather than the State of the nation because: dude’s not wearing a tie and no flag, so what is it? There’s nothing stately about it.

Are you sick of the sight of him, not really listening anymore…? Is he just background static at this stage? What is he there to do – ultimately – to be a loser again but worse than Cunliffe?

The tax u-turn is all anyone is talking about; being a complete repudiation of his own “captain’s call” – an ill-judged, selfish veto his team was too weak to resist.  It is the most important indication of what a re-built Labour movement might bring to a future government. Will Droppie McChipface still be there: 95% no. 20-1 on that. How can he be? He is an opportunistic hypocrite after what he said in his speech, and added to the loser dweeb vibe we grew to dislike, it amounts to a leadership change sometime next year.

As for the speech, it’s content and delivery, it was a mash. It had bits of everything thrown in with lots of sickly, sweet syrup to try to keep it together. The speech pitched and yawed, ranged and drifted from National’s bad m’kay to ANZAC Day to heart-rending tales from Labour’s motherland of heroes – school teachers – to the economy, to repudiating a tax policy that he himself, personally, was responsible for without any shame or apology. God, the carefully manicured absence of self-awareness to avoid accountability for what he was now calling “inequitable” and “unsustainable” was so egregious. It insulted the electorate’s collective intelligence, if not collective dignity. If only someone else – someone believable – was saying it instead of, you know, ginger dork boy over there, the guy with the sausage roll and no mates. Chris Hipkins is the Simeon Brown of Labour after all, that is the reality, one rare misstep after another.

“When even the IMF is saying our tax system is broken it really is time to do something.” And when Hipkins said that it immediately confirmed our worst thoughts: Labour will not fix anything until the IMF says they’re worried – fuck the 5 million people who live here and what they think. The cheek of this twerp. It’s only until Grant Robertson has resigned as an MP and finally cleared out his parliamentary office that they think it’s safe enough to start openly talking about a wealth tax within the party. That’s the chronology for what it’s worth.

Did it sound as though Hipkins believed what he was saying? He wasn’t admitting they, or he, were in the wrong for any of it. No hint of contrition at any point. Most tellingly was his cracking up under the pressure of the historic aspect of the tax reversal he had crucified the caucus upon less than a year ago. Hipkins provided the most excruciating moment:

“It’s not hard to contrast the commitment of my grandparent’s generation with the [*squeezed voice, drying up*] aggressive drive [*coughs*] towards individualism and dog-eat-dog competition that has prevailed since the 1980s.

Later this year we will mark a significant, and [*voice breaking up*] challenging, milestone in Labour’s history, [*To someone off-stage: ’Someone grab me a glass of water’* *coughs*] the 40-year anniversary of the election of the 4th Labour government.”

That’s more forced, eye-watering, hard swallowing and gagging than a Belgian porno. He choked on it, didn’t want to say it. Fucking say it! Phil and Helen etc were all part of it. They kept all of Roger’s stuff pretty much anyway. Take GST. Take it off? No. Never.

Labour ran the election on GST off fresh fruit and vegetables and yet they voted to kill the Maori Party Bill on GST that could have achieved a similar scenario. No. The Rogernomics they supposedly detest are all locked-in facets of the system that Labour believes can’t be changed unless National also agrees. Labour does things like ‘GST off’ reluctantly and in desperation when they are only completely sure they will lose and not have to do it – as we all know. The question is does Hipkins’ renunciation signal they have given up on winning the next election? Just, no, please. And check out the timeframe – they are bargaining on this troika government going a full term so the policy won’t be ready if there’s an early election.

No tie, not even a glass of water organised.

The speech has since been billed as a renunciation or break with neoliberalism. Khruschev denounced Stalin over four hours, but Hipkins spent hardly 4 minutes on neoliberalism and found Rogernomics ‘challenging’ for only about 4 seconds. Repudiation of neoliberalism would have taken more than our policy team will look into it. So, I cannot see it is a serious revision of anything other than reversing his own diktat on barring a wealth tax. And what else can he do?  He isn’t to be believed or trusted. Hipkins hasn’t got any mandate to exercise any transformative agenda given the election result. The willingness of the caucus to keep him as caretaker does not mean he is an architect to design the next government.

Under the leadership of Kruschev the Communist Party apparatus would have organised some water for his speech to the party faithful – Hipkins and Labour cannot provide even that. The irony of a man proclaiming Labour’s 3 waters would have worked when his own party can’t supply one glass to its leader in a speech about the nation is subconsciously absorbed by the audience.

Did anyone else wince when Hipkins went on about the ram raids, dairy owners and criminal justice? What a mess.

I’ve heard people say they think Labour is soft on crime. Nothing could be further from the truth. But a race to outbid each other on longer sentences won’t address the underlying problem of why we have so much crime in the first place. If we want safer communities, we need to tackle the causes of crime.

When I speak to dairy owners who have been the victims of ram raids they are at the end of their tether. Their businesses aren’t just where they work, they’re also often their homes too. They work so hard and they shouldn’t have to endure the fear and insecurity they currently experience.

But when I talk to them, they also express concern for the future of the kids who are doing the ram raiding. They often know the kids’ families, they know their backgrounds, and they want to know we are going to do something to give these kids a better future, not one where they spend a lifetime in and out of prison. It’s expensive, it doesn’t work, and it’s such a waste of human potential.

Investments in our people are investments in the future prosperity of all of us.

If we really want to be tough on crime, we should spend a lot more time and energy breaking the cycle before people offend.”

His own Justice Minister, Kiri Allan, is on a TVNZ interview saying she was suicidal over the cabinet decision changing the law to lower the age of jail for ram raiders… That was the first thing I thought of – I wonder if anyone else of the tens of thousands who saw that interview was thinking the same thing? How empty is Hipkins’ rhetoric when that sort of real life is streaming. Sacrifice some kids for the optics, it’s what the focus groups and the Karendemographic want. That was the government Hipkins ran – ran into ground. In his last reshuffle he couldn’t even fill 20 spots in the cabinet – useless.

The speech was mainly awful, hypocrisy, diversions, platitudes and corny bullshit filler, but I did enjoy the women’s choral parts where they say ‘no!’. Winston has quite a vocal female following and their synchronous responses are louder than Labour’s rent-a-mob, they’re a bit quieter – still determined, but quiet almost mumbling apologetically. Hipkins, as Winston does, employs the call and response very early to get everyone on-side. Hipkins posed four in a row to get Noes and then asked a rhetorical question (which, of course, they still responded to). The questions were about National and references “the incoming National Government”. In doing so Hipkins has framed the contest as between the big two and ignoring everyone else as much as possible.

“Did New Zealanders voting for change vote to wind back our world-leading smoke-free laws to fund tax cuts?

Did they vote for billions in tax breaks for landlords while threatening to cut free school lunches?

Did they vote for National’s new drivers’ tax and higher fuel prices while winding back almost every measure our Labour government put in place to tackle climate emissions?

Did they vote to suspend work upgrading our schools and hospitals and to stop the building of new state houses?

I’m pretty certain they didn’t vote for the Prime Minister to talk about tough love for others whilst claiming a $1,000 a week housing allowance he doesn’t need.”

Funny thing is, yes, New Zealanders voting for change did know most of that, or at least expected as much – it was going to be National plus necessarily Act and/or NZ First and this is what it looks like, no one is shocked by anything that National has done. All the shock and awe is coming from Act and NZ First. The shock is National are so weak they – and Luxon in particular – have no control over them. As for Luxon’s housing allowance rort – same stunt the last National PM did (when he was Finance Minister). They might not like all of it, but it is what they voted for. They weren’t going to vote for Hipkins and Labour then and those same voters gone to National won’t vote for Hipkins and Labour at the next election either.

TDB Recommends NewzEngine.com

STAY CONNECTED

11,996FansLike
4,057FollowersFollow

Foreign policy + Intel + Security

Subscribe | Follow | Bookmark
and join Buchanan & Manning LIVE Thursdays @ midday

MIL Public Webcast Service