Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

19 Comments

  1. I’m no fan of Andrew Little and I’m am no haemorrhaging commentator on Maori land issues, but, in my view, any legacy of that chap, Finlayson, is a poisoned chalice.

    A relevant question, where these issues arise, is: Who are the ‘advisers’ paid ‘consultancy fees’?

      1. Y’know money doesn’t make people happy so do I think a deal can be made anyway? Yeah, I do think Andrew Little could Jerry rig some sort of deal.

    1. It was a sure sign of Corruption when Finlayson heard the Decision on the WAI 1040 claim and yet had the Audacity to say the Crown was still Sovereign.

  2. Every time I say to myself “I renounce this criminal government”, I feel a little bit closer to redemption

    1. It’s another meh from me.
      A stunt.
      Legitimate grievance? Who knows.
      Will it change anything?
      Nope

  3. It does if you own that land Jays or own the land the road is on its our land we can do what we want with it and we will do it if we are pushed to. We use to have our own laws in the king country to protect our people from the scourge of alcohol. As the law stands at the moment it is not in our best interest. I support our whanau from Opotiki. And i would prefer settlements weren’t rushed for the sake of it and ticking the box.
    I am a big supporter of Mr Little for the first time for many years labour got two ticks from me, why? because I expect them to deliver I expect our Maori elected politicians to do there job and if they don’t they know what will happen. The approach might not be good but people are now getting desperate to get there message across especially our Maori whanau many of us are at the end of our tether.

  4. I see Little described the good old chap issuing him with the trespass as a lunatic. Really? Even if the trespass serve was a symbolic gesture (dear god let it have some legal legitimacy), this is how you describe your claimants? I tell you what is symbolic, this paltry, ridiculous sham of a settlement process, buying off 250 years of Maori grievance and land loss for a couple of TVs. I tell you who is the lunatic, a failed political leader who continually tries to appease a part of society and fails but continues to do it repetitively anyway. The only way to adequately address Maori grievance Andrew is to give every person with Maori ancestry $1 million each, a trillion dollars should cover it. It’s not enough to buy a house in Auckland but it’s a start.

  5. Those diesel BMWs are looking outdated. Time the government spent money on a newer hybrid model.

    1. I heard rumors they are looking at replacing them with a fleet of EV.

      1. I’d be surprised if they replace them this year. The car manufacturers are only coming out with EV SUVs or small sedans. The crown cars need to be mostly limo type cars or big sedans for security and for visiting VIPs.
        Maybe in another year or so when Audi and Jag bring out their EV sedans. I see BMW do a hybrid 7 series but they’ve only got limited range on battery.

    2. The BMW in the photo looks like their old fleet of 2011 models, not the current 2016 models they’re using.

  6. This is great news!! The more of the dregs of the colonials, and corporate whores are exposed, and cleansed from the peoples government, the better!! What better way of doing that than direct action, and cooperation among the rank and file of the unions, iwi, and true democratic people to remove these parasites from our leadership….

  7. More TOW breaches lake Taupo and the Waikato river who will pay for this the councils many are broke the government? The English version article 2 of the TOW states the Queen guarantees to us full exclusive undisturbed possession of our lakes etc ………….
    That effluent is not undisturbed in fact I am disturbed by this because shit like this keeps happening someone has to be held accountable. In the man time the immigration flood gates are still open i say to both local and central government get your shit together please.

  8. Whakatohea rejected a settlement 25 years ago, and at least one hapu wants to do so in respect of this settlement. A bit like Ngati Kahu in the Far North.

    Martyn Bradbury may rail against the government’s offer, but he does so in way that seems to show he is against all the previous settlements the Crown has made. Is that actually the case?

    I am sure not going to take his word as the revealed truth that the proposed settlement is unjust, and therefore it must be so.

Comments are closed.