This prison MUST NOT be built, because it is simply not needed to ensure public safety, and as Andrew Little very sensibly said the “tough on crime” policies of locking up evermore people have not worked. Prisons are Universities of crime.
Dear Simon Bridges & Matthew Hooton.
Quick word if I may before all the voting unfolds today.
Stab Judith Collins in the back now.
NOW!
Which thumb do you use to snap chat with Chris Bishop?
The one question media isn’t answering yet is ‘who benefits from this Megaprison’?
The last prison built was a Public Private Partnership for Serco where ACC had a 30% stakehold meaning a Government Department was reliant on incarceration for a revenue stream…
This case matters because it’s about civil rights, not racial profiling. If this had happened to a white NZer it would be equally questionable.
WHOEVER EMERGES VICTORIOUS from National’s leadership contest will face the challenge of re-defining their party’s core political mission.
A group of Chinese students are demanding that the government help them after NZQA have closed their school and discovered that the owner has stolen most of their money.
FFS – will one of you journalists do your actual job and directly ask…
‘Did you or any of your mercenary mates kill any civilians while on tour in Iraq’
…not ‘did you kill anyone’, that isn’t the question! GET HIM ON RECORD!
According to the government’s National Interest Analysis released yesterday, there would be a very small economic benefit from TPP-11. The costs and risks are far higher, including the real constraints on democratic decision-making and regulation of our economy to meet the challenges ahead. The TPP-11 is not in the interests of the New Zealand people. It should not be signed.
“TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE.” That’s what I would say to David Parker on the day he released the text of the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). With the signing ceremony due to take place in the Chilean capital, Santiago, on 8 March – a mere fortnight from the document’s release – the time available for thorough public scrutiny and debate is simply too short.