GUEST BLOG: Ross Meurant – Half Way Mark
Six months ago, I thought Labour would be returned at the next General Election – as a result of National losing. Today, I reckon National will gain the Treasury Benches – as a result of Labour losing.
Six months ago, I thought Labour would be returned at the next General Election – as a result of National losing. Today, I reckon National will gain the Treasury Benches – as a result of Labour losing.
This week – Trump & Greenland, Ihumatao hikoi, NIWA report saying 800000 Kiwis at risk from climate change & should submitters to parliament have to disclose their backers?
National’s 9 years in power were built upon selling as much cheap milk powder to China and foreign speculation in the domestic property market, so when National make policy, are they answering to Wellington or Beijing?
One of the interesting dynamics for the 2020 election will be the overseas vote. Typically this always benefits the Greens…
What if you believed that people you know, or meet on the streets, or live next door to, are actively plotting to steal your handbag, improve their lives at your expense or occupy your space?
WHAT WOULD YOU DO if you discovered a deranged crew-member deliberately endangering the onboard atmosphere of your spacecraft? Obviously, the delicate mechanism responsible for scrubbing the air and keeping it breathable is absolutely crucial to the survival of the ship’s entire crew. If you allow the saboteur to continue his destruction, everyone on board will die. What is your optimal course of action?
Now, I hesitate in the extreme to term The Herald’s John Roughan a “genius”. Yet every time I read one of his more “ideological” columns, that sort of sentiment seems to spring to mind. A sort of more-cynical/paranoid version of the famed ‘Hanlon’s Razor’ – “never attribute to malice, that which can adequately be explained by stupidity”.
Yay! The first generation of user pays, Gen X, are now going to have to wait longer to get their…
…The Dark Art of politics now is not in the proposal and debate of ideas, it is the promotion of anger as policy which is communicated to potential voters based on the outrage it generates amongst identifiable tribal protagonists.
Our under funded social infrastructure, our ‘me first’ consumerism, our 30 years of neoliberal mythology, our disconnection from one another, our untreated pain, our lack of hope from grinding poverty in a first world country, our damaged masculinity, the intergenerational consequences of colonialism, our unspoken rage culture, our inability to express emotion beyond anger – all of this demands questions we don’t want to hear as a society and the shame of suicide continues to hide and smother any healing.