Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. “On 28 November, Marc Lamont Hill addressed the United Nations in support of justice for the Palestinian people. On the following day, the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, CNN announced “Marc Lamont Hill is no longer under contract with CNN”. Hill’s principled stance against the oppression of the Palestinian people is seen by the enemies of peace, justice and equality as an intolerable threat to their desired hegemony.”

    I wonder… if Mr Hill had been made a pro-zionist speech at the UN and CNN had dumped his contract, would the Right be screaming “FREE SPEECH, FREE SPEECH!!”?

    What do you think? Of course they wouldn’t.

    “You can attack the Palestinians in America uninterrupted, call to expel them and deny their existence. Only don’t dare to touch Israel, the holy of holies, the country that exists above suspicion. And the height of chutzpah? Israel and the Jewish establishment keep on accusing the media, including CNN, of being slanderers of Israel. There’s no worse joke than that. Try to publish a critical article about Israel in a mainstream newspaper in the West – it’s getting more and more difficult, more often than not, impossible. But nothing will satisfy the lion’s hunger: The more he complains, the stronger he gets.” https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-cnn-firing-marc-lamont-hill-proves-israel-is-untouchable-in-u-s-media-1.6702572

  2. Marc Lamont Hill and what he said and what may have upset CNN:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgY1nzHYSrI

    I suspect CNN is like most MSM concerned that one of their reporters or commentators ‘took sides’ on a very sensitive issue.

    They want to appear neutral, objective and independent, but at times this becomes bizarre or absurd, especially when an international issue is so evidently proved to be under international law to be on the sides of one party, i.e. the Palestinians.

    There is too much fear to speak out, PC forbids it, hence endless mediocrity, hypocrisy and absurdity.

  3. Wulf Blitzer, CNN’s senior political commentator, once worked for a pro Israel lobby group, interesting:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_Blitzer

    “In the mid-1970s, Blitzer also worked for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) as the editor of their monthly publication, the Near East Report.[9][10] While at AIPAC, Blitzer’s writing focused on Middle East affairs as they relate to United States foreign policy.[11]”

    So how ‘independent’ is CNN on Israel then?

    1. Zionists and their ilk have run the show for many decades.

      The “chosen” leaders.

      All those who go along with it are equally responsible supporting this elitist rule by capturing the money system.

      Money buys power and corruption of most things including our news media and Govts..

Comments are closed.