Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

6 Comments

  1. Can someone please explain why there is no focus on the removal of the requirement to reduce nicotine in cigarettes? Won’t that help make them less addictive? Saying nicotine is like caffeine is almost irrelevant, because that’s the driver of the addiction. Why did they remove that arm of the legislation? There is no justification for that. Not that the crime increase seems to have any merit either.

    Costello and co have the tobacco industry so far up their arse it make this country look stupid….again. She’s a hack.

    1. Nicotine is only a little bit like caffeine – it’s far more addictive. My mother started smoking when she was thirteen. My father didn’t start until he was eighteen and trying to stay awake on a ship somewhere to the north of Russia. But both smoked twenty or thirty day for much of the rest of their lives. Then my mother was told if she didn’t give up, she would be dead within eighteen months. She eventually died of lung cancer but and eighty-seven about twenty-five years later. She told me just before she died that every morning she woke up she felt the absolute craving for a cigarette. She didn’t just want one she needed one. She was very strong minded woman, and that was pretty much the only thing that stopped her from going back to smoking. That and the support of my dad who also gave up. I’m not sure that reducing the nicotine content would have a great deal of effect on the craving – it might well be that they simply smoke more cigarettes, which the tobacco companies would love of course.

  2. The whole thing is disgusting .I hold no hope for the elderly as Costello is the minister for old people as well .She needs to fuck off back under the rock she climbed from under

  3. It seems obvious to me that moneyed interests are behind the backward steps in government actions. The answer must be; get at the root of the problem. We need a law to protect citizens. A business that uses lies to provide proven harmful products or services must be stopped. The result must be the imprisonment and fining of those in the administration of the business that uses lies to harm. Administrators in a business must all responsible for truth. The Horizon Scandal in the UK shows the need for all the people with power to ensure that the promotion of any harm is stopped. (Or else). This idea is up for polite debate.
    While I am bothering to have a say, consider the power that lobbyists have over weak-minded MPs. Lobbyists and their lobbying must be known to the public. Public needs to know what lobbyists are saying. Sessions can be filmed and uploaded to the internet so all the lobbying can be followed. Then the public can recognise lies, misinformation, and relevant information missed out.

Comments are closed.