Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

8 Comments

  1. This whole scheme is so people who get laid off or cannot work because they get cancer, are able to maintain their standard of living and not end up in their houses.

    For too long, business owners and employees have raked it in, living a champagne lifestyle, while the sick and disabled are left to live in their own filth.

    This even things up a bit.

    TBH, I wonder if ACC would have been able to get through in this environment, where it is all about screwing over people for a quick buck.

    1. Or they could increase ACC and add in Cancer and other illnesses….. but then you couldn’t employ a massive consultancy workforce to set it up costing billions and be as inefficient as possible and take years to implement.

      1. This sounds like a good idea. Two people with similar problems but caused by nature the order buy an accident finish up with vastly different outcomes. One could lose everything and 1 will be able to make a change in lifestyle but keep up with the field .

  2. I guess when you are part of the Beltway then it is the beltway that is important not what us happening on Fenton Street for example.

  3. I really want to saddle NZ employers and employees with another tax, so that poor employers don’t have to pay out their workers when they remove them to hire cheaper ones! (Sarcasm)

    Make the good workforces pay for the growing amount of bad workforces operating in NZ who seem to hire and fire, willy nilly, that other countries have a simple compulsory redundancy system that makes the company pay out when they make people redundant not some complex scheme that creates headaches for everyone else!

Comments are closed.