Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

15 Comments

  1. Nash seems to have lots of sympathy from opposition parties. Makes you wonder if the connection between donor and parliament makes some nervous. Sure Luxon is gunning for him, but Winnie and Seymour seem almost apologetic. It spoke volumes this morning when Simon Bridges said his biggest mistake was putting it in writing!

  2. Nash seems to have lots of sympathy from opposition parties. Makes you wonder if the connection between donor and parliament makes some nervous. Sure Luxon is gunning for him, but Winnie and Seymour seem almost apologetic. It spoke volumes this morning when Simon Bridges said his biggest mistake was putting it in writing!

  3. Keep him on until the slash enquiry then crucify him. Party funding is an extreme issue. All parties should have a fixed budget and equal air time in election run ups. Anything else is corrupt as and undemocratic imo.

  4. There isn’t anybody in Parliament which isn’t beholden to corporate political donors.

    Another reason why a new party, to challenge the traitorous Blairites in the Labour Party, will eventually emerge.

  5. “……he’s a dickhead who would big note anything without the brains to appreciate what he was doing.”

    Unfortunately, there’s a lot of it about. Ticking boxes, marketing the message and spinning is all that matters

    1. And so it was with Cam Wallace, Marama, the Labour Party’s fish and chip group, and several chief gee bung wonders of government agencies and corporations.
      I’m devastated (NOT)

  6. Aloha Luxon who can’t see the wood for the trees, wants Nash to resign, to force a by-election. A waste of money from the person who purports to know about money, in an electorate with more important issues, such as trying to recover from cyclone devastation. Why have a by-election so close to the general election, when voters in the general election can make up their minds about Nash then. Luxon is putting political muckraking above being sensible. And if he wanted to be sensible, then can he explain why Barbara Kuriger is still in parliament, after her severe conflict of interest with MPI over ill treatment of livestock on her family farm? At least Nash had his heart in the right place, trying to do the right thing, but doing it the wrong way, while Kuriger was just nepotism, yet no talk from Aloha about a by-election for Kuriger.
    And pray tell, does Aloha have any opinion on the dirty politics revelations from the book of the same name, well of course he would, and he would be hell bent on telling everyone, and calling for an independent inquiry, if the dirty politics revelations came from Labour, but since it was National…meh.

  7. I see Chipkins said that reviewing all past cabinet communications for malfeasance would be too big a task. I disagree. Hire a team of consultants to do it if you have to Chippy! There is something fishy going on here, if the PMs office can assess that the Nash information trading was out of scope then they must have seen it to make this assessment. What other malfeasance lies within at the Beehive?

Comments are closed.