Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

8 Comments

  1. Yes surely there could have been a supervised truth and conciliation meeting between the parties concerned…counselling …and some sort of patch up job and compensation maybe to the injured party?

  2. As a Cabinet Minister the bar moves higher.
    There was obviously enough of a case to tip Jacinda’s hand.
    Would we be as generous if it had been a male transNational Minister?

  3. Good leadership from the Prime Minister.
    Don’t go all identity politics about it.
    The investigation confirmed the incident occurred, finer details disputed but irrelevant= gone burger.
    If the minister was allowed to stay then you Martyn would be supporting a bullying boss. Government should set a high bar and stick to it, don’t make exceptions because you are male female, gender indifferent, tall short fat skinny pakeha or Maori. That’s equality.

    1. keepcalmcarryon: “Don’t go all identity politics about it.”

      Agreed. That sort of behaviour shouldn’t be tolerated, regardless of who the perpetrator is.

  4. If you can’t even remember that NZ had suffragists not suffragettes you don’t have the right to even speak about it.

  5. If the reports are correct a high turn over in staff is always a concern. I have seen it over my working life and it always as a direct result of the boss in the department or organisation who is a total arse. And physical confrontations with subordinate workers is simply not acceptable. None of this has been denied, just differing takes on the incidents. And there has now been an independent enquiry conducted so I guess you are saying Jacinda just dismissed this Minister for no justifiable reason, just cos it felt good, for shits and giggles.

    By your logic being a female Maori MP in suffrage week overrides basic Labour Party philosophy of looking after her workers.

    Should rename September “bash Jacinda month” because she can do no right!

Comments are closed.