Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

One Comment

  1. “The Independent Police Conduct Association (IPCA) investigation into Deputy Commissioner Wally Haumaha claims he was “belittling and humiliating” towards staff.

    The IPCA began its investigation after receiving three complaints about DC Haumaha’s behaviour, including claims he had bullied two women from the Ministry of Justice and Corrections who were working on a joint project with police.

    ‘We struggled to get taken seriously’: Women speak out on Wally Haumaha inquiry
    Police investigating claim Wally Haumaha phoned witness to bullying incident
    Two women make formal complaints about Wally Haumaha
    The report, released on Thursday, found his behaviour was “inappropriate and unprofessional” and “unnecessarily autocratic”.

    “He exhibited intimidating and humiliating behaviour,” the report states.

    “DC Haumaha showed a lack of judgement in expecting an autocratic management style to get the best from an inter-agency team.”

    It’s the second review DC Haumaha has faced, after a separate inquiry led by Mary Scholtens QC looked into the process that led to him being appointed as Deputy Commissioner.

    Ms Scholtens found there were no complaints made to police about Mr Haumaha’s conduct, and “without a complaint there was nothing to take into account”.

    However she did acknowledge that his management style had come into question.

    “The incidents reflected DC Haumaha’s adoption of a direct police-style approach to a multi-agency project, where a more orthodox public sector approach may have been appropriate.”

    The two women who placed complaints about DC Haumaha’s behaviour with the Independent Police Conduct Authority say their complaints about bullying were minimised.

    “In 2016 we struggled to get our complaints about Deputy Commissioner Haumaha’s behaviour taken seriously. We came up against impenetrable systemic barriers.

    “We want to be clear: we complained,” the women wrote in a statement to Newshub.

    “We were never given the opportunity by the police to formalise our complaints at that time. The outcome of these complaints is that our concerns were minimized and the incidents in question were never investigated.”

    But this latest report finds he did act inappropriately and unprofessionally towards staff members.

    Police Minister Stuart Nash has previously said he wasn’t prepared to put his confidence behind Mr Haumaha until the IPCA report was complete.

    “We don’t want to prejudice that in any way, shape or form, so let’s just wait until that’s back,” he told media in November.

    He said the decision on whether Mr Haumaha would return to his office would be a decision for the Police Commissioner.

    But National’s police spokesperson Chris Bishop says his appointment has been a “debacle from the start”.

    “Wally Haumaha’s position as the country’s second highest ranking cop is now untenable,” he says.

    And National leader Simon Bridges agrees, calling it a “damning report”.

    “It was Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern who appointed Wally Haumaha. She now has to take responsibility and dismiss the man that she appointed to one of the most senior and powerful roles in the country,” he says.

    “It would be unconscionable for Mr Haumaha to stay in this constitutionally important role given the seriousness of the IPCA findings.”

    A separate review by the State Services Commission into how the different departments handled the bullying allegations is expected to be released on Thursday. ”

    Matthew, I am surprised that you would want the top cop’s job to go to a man with a dodgy track record in treating women just because he is Maori.

    Do you not know of the world-leading rates of New Zealand women being abused and killed by men ? That all women, and all good men, do not like women being abused, battered and treated like dogs – or worse – because it is morally wrong, it hurts, it is socially destructive, and it screws up kids who often end up in trouble- with the police, Matthew ? And that it is cowardly and sub-human ?

    Contrary to your allegations here, the reports of investigation into complaints made against Mr Haumaha, suggest that the two Justice Dept women who made specific complaints against Mr Haumaha, struggled to be heard, suggesting that the police closed ranks and were protective of Mr Haumaha – Wally and the NZ Police force versus two women. Wow.

    Do you think that the NZ Police were protecting Wally because he was Maori? Or was it just because he was a man? The boys protecting the boys as usual, eh ?

    You, Sir, may have no problem with men who belittle women being put in positions of authority, but others do.

    Nor is the first time that a Maori male has risen high in the ranks of the NZ Police and found wanting – not because of his race, but because of his own behaviour.

    This could be why Maori women are now being given preferential help, and extra support, to advance through the police ranks. Speak to the wahine.

    You have cited out-of-date research, possibly because you would struggle to find contemporary research to support your agenda.

    “…this is a policy that quite clearly is aimed at Maori and people of color and to be frank this is in stark opposition to what they should be doing which is engaging more deeply with these communities when it comes to lowering crime.”

    I suggest to you that this policy which you are complaining about, is not “aimed at Maori and people of colour,” it is aimed at reducing crime.

    I further suggest to you that the community needs to engage with itself about the reasons for its crime- which are myriad – and that it is unrealistic and simplistic to sheet all responsibility onto the police. I suggest that you stop blaming them: successive neolib govts have damaged the social structure of this country, deliberately, and massively more than any cop ever could.

Comments are closed.