Similar Posts

30 Comments

  1. Russia and China (and the other BRICS Nations) are making a stand against the West, and at this stage it appears the USA empire will lose it’s grip on the totalanarianism it is seeking aggressively. But, hey, they have used the bomb before and they are a bunch of panicking incompetents, so who knows what madness is coming?

    1. Or Putin is a god bothering psychopath and Xi is drunk on his eternal leadership status. There is an awful lot of blaming the US and West, without acknowledging that Russia and China are equally as bad. No one is forcing China to help themselves to the Pacific, in fact their imperialism has brought the US back into the region.

      How about a few less cows and more wheat growing.

      1. Sorry, ex kiwi, but the Japanese would have taken both us and China in WW2 if not for the USA. Get your Yellow Peril right!

  2. If Putin takes Odessa then NATO must take it back at all cost. Losing access to the Black Sea will slowly destroy Ukraine.

    1. Spot on, which is why Russia will do it. A rump state infested by internecine warfare between proto fascist Galicians would suit Russian aims well. Then theres the issue of who will bear the debt for all those Western weapons?

    2. [If Putin takes Odessa then NATO must take it back at all cost.]

      NATO doesn’t exist except on paper. It would have to be some country that “takes it back”. If that country were to be the USA, it would risk starting a nuclear war.

    3. The Ukraine is finished. It’s just a matter of how much they lose, depending how many more Rusian lifes are lost. More than Russia will carve off peices to settle old-historic arguements.
      The west caused this mess and Ukraine (in this instant) are paying the price. Instead of Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, Syria, Yemen, etc etc….proxy wars for a dying USA empire.
      p.s. There is NO…rule based global system.that is PURELY U$A B.S for ‘do as we say, and not as we do’………..

  3. Can the Russian Army seize Odessa? I don’t think so. That may have been an initial aim, but from what we have seen over the last two months, I don’t thank the Russian Army could do so now. Ukraine will have too much intelligence of any such an attempt and the heavy weapons they are getting now will tip the balance. The Ukrainians have also had two months to prepare their defences.

    In the event that Putin makes such an attempt, would he use a nuke if it is all turning to custard? In my view, highly unlikely. A battlefield nuke probably could not turn the issue. Yes, he would destroy a complete Ukrainian brigade which typically covers a couple of square kilometres, but destroying one brigade will not be enough. There will be defence in depth so that means multiple nukes. He won’t do it.

    Much more likely is strengthening the land bridge from Crimea to the Donbas. He can probably succeed in that. He then declares victory. To get Ukraine to accept this, he will bomb their main cities until they accept it.

    1. Agreed. But one thing we haven’t seen much of yet is Ukrainian terrorism within Russia, you could expect this to happen with more Russian gains in coming months.

      Remember the Chechen hostage seige in Moscow? Awful ending, the Russian special forces ended up killing more hostages than terrorists.

    2. My crystal ball says Russia will have Odessa sooner rather than later, but have it it will.

    3. Odessa will be Russian controlled, uless something weird happens between now and then.
      Remeber Russia goes slowly, slowly. The main benefit for civilisians is WAY WAY way less of them die, than if the Americans and it’s pusst-NATO was involved.
      So dont underestimate the Russian armed forces just beacuse this is not going the speed of American carnage around the world.
      p.s. This is NOT in any way meant to side with the Russians or deflect from the fact war is awful and should be avoided.

      1. Sorry Kevin – the ones who enjoy our media’s constant pro-Ukraine presentations will already have damned you as a Putin-apologist, and an evil Russophile.
        They cannot tolerate anyone objecting to the biased coverage we are fed.

  4. As the fog of Covid begins to clear, after two long hazy years, this is what awaits.
    It should be required reading for every member of the NZ cabinet.

  5. You should understand how little of a threat you are to Putin and why kiwis more general won’t even bother fighting. If we do fight, which we are, that will make New Zealand susceptible to a nuclear counter strike.

  6. Exactly. He is a clear communicator. He told the whole world he doesnt want US/NATO missiles in Ukraine. The border country that controls the flow of his oil revenue from Europe was destabalised. He said he would invade if the Minsk peace treaty wasnt implemented. He does what he say’s hes going to do.

    1. And he has consistantly said so since about 2000-2002.
      But hey propaganda and not letting facts get in the way of a good B.S story.
      …we are the bad guys…..it’s horrible to realise it, but it is still true.

  7. I think we shouldn’t overlook that only one nation has the trifecta on using chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

  8. I think we shouldn’t overlook that only one nation has the trifecta on using chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

  9. I think that the Left in the West has gone gaga, cognitive dissonance abounds. Bombers got it.

    Some questions for Leftists.
    If capitalism is the enemy which side should Leftists support?
    If imperialism is the enemy which side should Leftists support?
    If neo Fascism is the enemy which side should Leftists support?
    If globalism is the enemy which side should Leftists support?

    Start thinking.

  10. “I fear Putin wants to use an extreme event of violence to terrify NATO into freezing. I think that event will either be a battlefield Nuke, chemical weapons attack or bio-weapon.”

    You’ve been likely seeded that idea solely (as in ~100%) by Western MSM/political propaganda. If any weapon of mass destruction is used, it will be a deliberate “own goal” by the clear oligarch Zelensky in order to escalate this war to cover up various far-reaching crimes. Anyone who has been following Ukraine politics for the last decade or so (really ever sense the US ousted the pro-Russian govt in 2014 via the CIA funded “Green Revolution”), the Clintons, the Bidens (let alone the Hunter Biden “laptop from hell”), knows that Ukraine has been used as a sort of “piggy bank” for (presumably) money laundering (hopefully that is all it is, because those US funded Ukraine biolabs are a giant question mark still) that continues to this day.

  11. Russia’s emblem, coat-of-arms is a two headed eagle, not a bear!!!!
    That Byzantine eagle looks east and west, and claims power over both.
    Two heads are better than one bear!

Comments are closed.